Connor Scott

No length. No girth. No problem.

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@Liam_Holman99 Starmer’s own record is the problem: digital ID, local elections, winter fuel, welfare cuts, grooming gangs, income tax, the two-child cap, workers’ rights, farm tax, pub rates, and more. The Labour movement deserves better than constant flip-flopping

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@SamCKx This is as someone who has voted labour in the past

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@SamCKx A few reasons come to mind, the constant U-turns, broken manifesto pledges, claimer more freebies than any other labour leader, Mandelson as Ambassador, introduced legislation which arrests grannies for holding placards opposing genocide. Probably could go on.

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@DuncanCantDie @danbailz @thejukeboxluke This

[Patriotic Restorer @RestorerPatriot]

China, Iran, and Russia have all spent enormous resources trying to block VPNs and none of them are even close to succeeding.

VPNs aren't a switch you can simply turn off.

So the question is simple: why is @UKLabour even exploring this direction?

Control? More damage to businesses?

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall promises to come back with a solution to the social media ban's VPN get-around.

@leicesterliz is a retard. She hasn't got a clue about the enormous effort required. All of it is pointless because it's not possible to prevent VPN use.

Preventing all VPN usage would require blocking an enormous range of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, a measure so extreme that it would effectively disable access to the internet.

Good luck with that Liz. I'll still be using a VPN while you endlessly try to stop me.

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke And I explained how to get around these but you clearly can't read 😂

[Nym @nym]

The entities that want to ban VPNs want to dismantle and rebuild the internet as we know it and make a walled garden of control.

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke Impossible to block them and with the reasons above you can get around IP blocking, dpi and port blocking

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke Some vpns may also use residential IPS because most sites block ips from commercial data centers. Some vpns also give you a dedicated IP which is unique to you so there is only you using it and not loads of traffic running through it making it less likely to be flagged

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke Look at places like China who block vpns. People get around it so easily. It's impossible to block vpns

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke It can't be done and anyone who knows about computers knows that. You keep googling because you clearly know nothing about computers and the internet and how it works

[Telegram Messenger @telegram]

Over 300,000 people die of drowning each year. In order to protect society, it is now illegal to consume or possess water.

Your government is also considering banning solid food, as it presents a needless choking hazard.
You are not an adult.
You are a baby.
Eat the baby food.

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke Clueless

[Mololuwa | Cybersecurity - (The God Complex) @cyber_rekk]

Australia banned social media for under-16s in December
61% of them are still on social media

The UK is now doing the same thing
The average British 15-year-old has access to VPNs, Tor, obfuscation bridges, and GrapheneOS tutorials on YouTube

The same tools used by journalists in authoritarian regimes
The government just accidentally enrolled an entire generation in a mandatory privacy and circumvention course

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke You have no idea 😂

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@danbailz @DuncanCantDie @thejukeboxluke You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about

[Connor Scott @C_Scott0310]

@DuncanCantDie @danbailz @thejukeboxluke Guys a moron but thinks he knows it all

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

"Interdire les VPN", c'est ne rien comprendre à ce qu'est un VPN.

Un VPN, ce n'est pas un produit, c'est un principe. Un tunnel chiffré entre votre machine et un serveur que vous choisissez. Votre trafic ressort avec l'adresse de ce serveur, point final. C'est de la cryptographie et du routage, rien d'autre.

Or ce tunnel chiffré, c'est exactement la même brique technique que le HTTPS de votre banque, le SSH de n'importe quel développeur, le réseau interne de n'importe quelle entreprise. Le chiffrement et le tunneling, ce n'est pas "le truc des hackers", c'est le socle de l'internet moderne.

Donc "interdire les VPN", au sens littéral, ça veut dire interdire les tunnels chiffrés. Et interdire les tunnels chiffrés, c'est casser le e-commerce, la banque en ligne, le télétravail, bref tout ce qui fait qu'internet fonctionne. Vous ne pouvez pas tuer l'un sans tuer l'autre.

Maintenant le concret, celui qui fait que c'est déjà perdu.

Il n'y a pas "un VPN" à bloquer. Vous louez un serveur à 5 euros par mois chez Hetzner, DigitalOcean ou AWS, vous installez WireGuard ou OpenVPN en trois commandes, et vous avez votre propre VPN sur une IP que personne n'a sur sa liste de blocage. Un gamin de 16 ans fait ça pendant la page de pub.

Vous pouvez bloquer les IP des fournisseurs commerciaux connus ? Ça ne change rien à l'auto-hébergé. Pour aller plus loin, il vous faut un pare-feu national avec inspection profonde des paquets et liste blanche de protocoles. Autrement dit la Chine, l'Iran, un appareil de surveillance de masse. Et même ça fuit en permanence (Shadowsocks, V2Ray, protocoles obfusqués qui imitent du trafic HTTPS classique).

Le choix réel est donc binaire. Soit votre interdiction est du théâtre, contournée en 48 heures. Soit vous construisez une Grande Muraille numérique, et même Pékin n'arrive pas à la fermer complètement.

Le fond du problème, c'est que ces gens légifèrent contre l'arithmétique. On ne vote pas une loi contre les mathématiques. Le tunnel chiffré existera tant que le chiffrement existera, et le chiffrement existera tant qu'internet existera.

Des bureaucrates qui n'ont jamais écrit une ligne de code de leur vie décident d'interdire une primitive cryptographique qu'ils ne savent même pas définir. Ils ont déjà perdu. C'est le poulet sans tête : ça continue de courir, mais la décision est déjà tombée.

[Abdulkadir | Cybersecurity @cyber_razz]

Yes.

Here’s how you can create your own VPN service in about 15 minutes.

1. Rent a cheap VPS ($4–10/month or use Oracle’s free tier)

2. Install WireGuard:
apt update && apt install wireguard -y

3. Generate your VPN keys:
wg genkey | tee privatekey | wg pubkey > publickey

4. Create a WireGuard config and assign your VPN network (e.g. 10.0.0.0/24)

5. Enable IP forwarding:
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

6. Start WireGuard:
systemctl enable wg-quick@wg0
systemctl start wg-quick@wg0

7. Install the WireGuard app on your laptop/phone.

8. Import your client configuration and connect.

That’s it.

You now have your own VPN server instead of paying for a shared VPN service.

Bonus:

• Full control
• Usually faster
• No shared exit nodes
• Great learning project for networking & cybersecurity

Most people think VPNs are some complex infrastructure.
In reality, it’s often just a Linux server and WireGuard.