@wakeupusa I’ve had dogs all of my life for more than seven decades. Now you show up on I’m supposed to listen to you? How about Muslim Call to prayer that all of us have to listen to?
Victor Davis Hanson says today’s Democratic Party would rather lose elections than return to the Bill Clinton era, calling its leaders “ignorant and arrogant.”:
“The Democratic Party’s agenda doesn’t really ever get 51 percent of the people, so they have various ways of getting around it. They control the media, they control K-12 education, the universities, popular entertainment, popular culture, and the foundations. And they opened the borders. We now have a record 53 million people who were not born in the United States. That’s 16 percent of the population. So that, in itself, is a condemnation of their agenda. If you tell them they can win—if you go back to 1992 and 1996, I don’t necessarily mean win an election, but be competitive with the Bill Clinton agenda—they would rather lose than win with something like that because they’re unhinged. That doesn’t mean they’re not dangerous, and it doesn’t mean they can’t do a lot of damage. You’re right about that. Everybody has to take them seriously. They have to register. They have to get out and vote. These are very dangerous people. And they’re very ignorant people. They have degrees, but they’re educated ignoramuses. Ignorance and arrogance are a very dangerous combination, and they have both.”
@omgsidewalks In order for that to happen, there would need to be an increase in price of products that employers sold as it would take more employees to produce the same quantity being produced now.
OP-ED: WaPo’s David Ignatius calls China’s theft of 220M U.S. voter files “no big deal.” Trump’s docs prove otherwise and it fits the IC’s own definition of election interference. @jsolomonReports exposes the China blind spot at the Washington Post: https://t.co/C34YiiGfXE