Let’s talk about the 1% problem. When AI compresses the window between disclosure and active exploitation from weeks to hours, spending finite security resources on the 99% of vulnerabilities that don’t matter becomes a structural liability.
@sourcecode2025 interviewed Qualys’ Himanshu Kathpal, who argues that our tool – exploit validation with TruConfirm, “should be the baseline” for all security teams.
Don’t miss this article breaking down TruLens, TruConfirm, Agent Val, and how they factor into the battle against AI-powered attackers.
🔍 https://t.co/UzuBl0OEFy
#Cybersecurity #AI
I never in my wildest dreams thought I’d reach a point where I had to choose between political parties… let alone spend hours researching bills, policies, corruption, loopholes, and all the garbage that comes with it.
The more I read…
The more I research…
The more sickening it becomes.
You start realizing most of these people don’t represent us.
They represent power, money, donors, headlines, and whatever keeps them in office another term.
Meanwhile Americans are out here working real jobs, raising families, paying taxes, struggling to survive, and watching politicians argue online like influencers instead of leaders.
Half the country doesn’t even trust the system anymore.
And honestly…
can you blame them?
You sit back and think:
“We don’t need these people.”
Because somewhere along the line public service turned into performance art.
Most Americans don’t want perfection.
They want honesty.
Accountability.
Someone who actually fights for the people instead of spending all day chasing cameras, clout, and another election cycle.
That’s the part that hits hardest.
The deeper you look…
the harder it becomes to unsee it.
In my 48 years, I’ve only seen one person truly stand up and fight for the American people while openly backing our military and law enforcement through every attack thrown at them.
That man is Donald Trump.
Do I agree with every single thing? No.
But I believe he loves this country, and I believe he fights for it.
And in a time where most politicians feel scripted, bought, controlled, or terrified to say what they actually believe…
that matters to me.
So I stand behind him.
Because at least I know where he stands.
And these days, that alone feels rare.
“Free Palestine.”
I grew up on those words.
In Lebanon, most people around me wanted a free Palestine for a very practical reason — to send the Palestinian refugees back. The civil war that tore my country apart was ignited in no small part by the Palestinian armed factions who turned Lebanon into their launching pad. “Free Palestine” meant: free us from them.
In Damascus, where my father’s family lived, the sentiment was different but equally self-serving. Palestine must be returned to the Arabs, its righteous owners. No one asked follow-up questions. No one was expected to.
Palestine was central to Islam, most Arabs are Muslim, therefore supporting the Palestinian cause was reflexive. A non-brainer in the most literal sense — no brain engaged at all.
Nobody stopped to point out that Palestine is not an Arabic word. Nobody found it strange that Jerusalem, the supposedly third holiest city in Islam, is not mentioned once in the Quran. Not once. Nor is Palestine. The entire theological and political architecture of this cause rests on a foundation that their own scripture doesn’t bother to acknowledge.
What was actually happening was indoctrination. A systematic, generational rejection of Jewish sovereignty — and frankly, of any minority sovereignty. Jews, Christians, Druze, Kurds, Assyrians, Yazidis — the Arab world has been remarkably consistent in how it treats people who are different. We just don’t talk about that.
Instead, in the West, we talk about Palestine.
In the West, a civilization that has elevated human rights to its highest moral currency, the Palestinian cause has become the one exception to every rule. In the queue of human suffering, Palestinians cut the line every time. Homosexuals executed in Gaza and hanged from cranes in Iran? Palestine first. Women imprisoned in Saudi Arabia for campaigning for the right to drive — a right they were denied until 2018 — girls sold into marriage in Afghanistan, women erased from public life entirely under the Taliban? After Palestine. Political dissidents ground into dust in Syrian and Egyptian prisons, journalists disappeared in Libya, children starving in Yemen while their rulers wage proxy wars, entire populations hollowed out by hunger in Sudan? All of it waits. Christians ethnically cleansed from Iraq and Syria, the Arab world methodically emptied of every Jewish community it once held — a demographic erasure carried out across a century with surgical patience and near-total Western silence?
Palestine is still first.
So let’s end where we started. Free Palestine. Which Palestine, exactly? The Roman invention? The British administrative line? The British Mandate covered the entire territory of what is today Israel, the West Bank, Gaza and Jordan. In 1921, 78% of that mandate was handed to the Hashemite family — a dynasty imported from Hijaz in present-day Saudi Arabia — and became the Kingdom of Jordan, which it remains to this day. A foreign royal family, on the majority of historic Palestine, ruling it as a monarchy. Nobody protests that. No flags, no chants, no encampments. The remaining 22% was designated for the Jews, became Israel, and is the only part that any pro-Palestinian activist has ever had a problem with.
So when you say Free Palestine, you mean that 22%. You mean the Jews.
And free it from whom? From a people with a three-thousand-year-old documented presence in that land, to restore the glory of a name coined by Roman colonizers, a name lifted from the Torah, a name that has no roots in Arabic, no mention in the Quran, and no history as a sovereign state?
You are not chanting for liberation. You are chanting for colonialism — the Roman kind, repackaged for social media.
Free Palestine is not a cause. It is a colonial term, coined by invaders, recycled by the indoctrinated. The least you can do is have the intelligence to understand it and the decency to reflect on your position.
📍#Israel
Scott Jennings reacts to the high-profile Tucker Carlson & NYT interview that has the political world buzzing.
From the Iran conflict to calling President Trump the 'antichrist?' What is going on with Tucker Carlson?
Get the full breakdown here:
Muzzled No More: Health Insider, Former California Department of Public Health insider Ronald F. Owens Jr Blows Whistle on Deadly COVID Shots Targeting, Harming & Killing Americans
📆Date: 5/2/2026
⏰Time: 9 pm EST
🔗Link: https://t.co/1vDWzRJXe9
@NateCain4WV @mcpota @cain_nate
The floodgates are opening.
Senator Chuck Grassley has released a letter to the DOJ and FBI along with internal FBI records related to the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One deal.
Here’s what it shows.
The documents confirm that the FBI opened a formal preliminary investigation in January 2016 into the Clinton Foundation. The concern was whether foreign governments and business figures used donations, speaking fees, or financial relationships to gain influence over U.S. government decisions while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Possible criminal violations based on the allegations and facts established to date, include the following:
• 18 USC §201 (Bribery of Public Officials)
• 18 USC §207 (Restrictions on former officers, employees, and elected officials of the Executive and Legislative branches)
• 18 USC §208 (Acts Affecting a Personal Financial Interest)
• 18 USC §1956 (Laundering of monetary instruments)
The investigation focused on a pattern: money flowing to the Clinton Foundation or related individuals, followed by favorable policy decisions, access, or business outcomes.
A bribery-related violation can occur even if no official action is ultimately taken, as long as a payment was made with the intent to influence a public official.
Some of the examples included:
• Donations from individuals tied to Uranium One during the time a Russian state company was seeking control of U.S. uranium assets
• A mining-related donation followed by U.S. diplomatic pressure that benefited that company
• Business deals in Colombia and elsewhere involving major donors who later received government approvals or concessions
• Payments for speeches or roles followed by policy or regulatory decisions (including Boeing and a UAE airport project)
The Uranium One deal was a central focus. This involved U.S. uranium assets being transferred to Russia’s state nuclear company, Rosatom, with approval from a U.S. government body that included the State Department. Investigators looked at whether donations tied to people involved in that deal were connected to the approval process.
The records show the FBI gathered reports, intelligence summaries, and conducted interviews. They also identified additional witnesses and evidence they still needed to pursue.
Key figures also ensnared in the investigation:
• Cheryl Mills
• Huma Abedin
• Anthony Weiner
• Frank Giustra
• Doug Band
At one point, investigators noted they had found no evidence “to date” of direct influence over the Uranium One approval, but that was a preliminary assessment, not a final conclusion.
What stands out is that the investigation appears to have never been fully completed. Internal records from 2018–2020 show:
• Key interviews still hadn’t been done
• Additional evidence was still being reviewed
• Several investigative requests were still pending
Grassley’s position is that the investigation uncovered serious patterns consistent with a potential pay-to-play scheme, but was left unresolved without a clear final outcome.
He is now demanding the DOJ and FBI turn over all records, including financial reports, interview transcripts, and unredacted documents, to determine what the government ultimately found.
This was a real federal investigation into potential pay-for-play involving the Clinton Foundation, it developed substantial leads and evidence, and according to this letter, it was never clearly finished or publicly resolved.
This may all change under FBI Director Kash Patel.
NEW EPISODE – The Raising Cain Show
American Strength: Trump’s Next Moves and the Fight for America First
📆Date: 04/25/2026
⏰Time: 9:00 pm EST
🔗Link: https://t.co/aLHoRSCuOr
American citizens first. No retreat. No surrender.
@MCPOTA @NateCain4WV@cain_nate
The Raising Cain Show: The War at Home: Exposing Human Trafficking with Sal Broes III
📆Date: 04/18/2026
⏰Time: 9:00 pm EST
🔗Link: https://t.co/9wm37tU86A
Human trafficking isn’t happening somewhere else—it’s happening right here in our communities.