CaliCoastChick @CaliCoastChick - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

5 months ago

The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical Christian attitude, and we also who have been national socialists up to this day — many even who are strict Heathens — have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas. -Heinrich Himmler

Ahnenkrieger

@Ahnenkrieger

5 months ago

Christianity is a Homosexual Männerbund I recently said to a Hitler Youth leader: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘰 𝘶𝘯-𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦.” 150 years ago someone at a Catholic university wrote a doctoral thesis with the title: “𝘋𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘭?” From this the whole tendency of Christianity emerges: it is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women. The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men for the erection and maintenance of this 2,000-year old Bolshevism. I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists. These Christians were then the worst bacteria which the great city contained, the worst jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were. The Bolshevism of that time had now the power to become great on the carcass of the dying Rome. The priesthood of the Christian church which later subjugated the Aryan church in unending conflicts goes on, since the 4th or 5th Century, to long for the celibacy of priests. It relies on Paul and the very first apostles who derogate the woman as something sinful and permit or recommend marriage as merely a legal way out of prostitution — that is in the Bible — and derogate the procreation of children as a necessary evil. This priesthood continues along in this way for several centuries until in 1139 the celibacy of priests is fully implemented. I am furthermore convinced that the way out for the few who do not want to yield to this homosexuality, especially for the country parsons, the majority of whom — more than 50% — I estimate not to be gay, is to procure for themselves in confession the necessary married and single women; I assume that in the monasteries the homosexuality ranges from 90 or 95 to 100%. If today the trials that concern homosexuality among priests went on again and if we would treat the priests as we do any citizen in Germany, then I would undertake to guarantee for the next three to four years 200 or more such trials. The realization of the trials fails to take place not because there is a lack of cases, but because we just do not have as many officials and judges as we would need to employ. Within the next four years very conclusive evidence will be produced — I hope — that the Church organization in its leadership, its priesthood, is for the most part a homosexual erotic Männerbund, that on this basis has been terrorizing humanity for the past 1,800 years, demands from it the greatest blood sacrifice, and has been sadistically perverse in its utterances in the past. I need only to recall the witch and heretic trials. The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical Christian attitude, and we also who have been national socialists up to this day — many even who are strict Heathens — have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas. I know even today very many party members who believe they have to prove the special firmness of their worldview and their own special masculinity through very rowdy and truculent behaviour toward women. I recognize furthermore a certain tendency in our ranks to exclude women from all events and celebrations. These same people complain then about the fact that women cling here and there to the church, or are not absolutely 100 percent won over for National Socialism. They however ought not to complain since they treat women as second class citizens and keep them from all our inner life. No one needs be surprised then if they are not fully won over for this inner life. We must be clear about that: the movement, the Worldview has lasting stability if it is supported by the woman, for men comprehend all things with the mind, while the woman comprehends all things with feeling. The German woman, not the man, has borne the greater sacrifice of blood in the witch and heretic trials. The priests knew exactly why they burned 5,000-6,000 women: exactly because they emotionally held fast to the old knowledge and the old doctrine and emotionally and instinctively could not be dissuaded from them, while the man had already converted by logic and thought: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵. 𝘞𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺. 𝘐 𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘱𝘵, 𝘐 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘮𝘺𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥.” I come back to our issue. I see in the whole movement an excessive masculinization and in this excessive masculinization the seedbed for homosexuality. I ask you now, if you have the opportunity to discuss these ideas in detail — but not before the entire officer corps — then talk about these things with one man or another. Please make sure that our men — as it has been initiated by me — come together at the summer solstice celebration with the girls to dance. I think it absolutely is right that we now and then arrange a dance for the young candidates in the winter to which we now invite not girls who are in any way bad, but rather the very best, and where we give the SS-man the opportunity to dance with girls and to be happy and merry with them. I think this is particularly important for the single reason that, it helps to assure that, no one ever comes down the wrong road in the direction of homosexuality. I think it important for a positive reason: we should not be surprised if this or that SS-man marries a completely wrong and racially worthless girl if we do not give the men the opportunity to get to know worthy, racially sound girls. With the youth I see the need absolutely to take care that the boy of 16-17 years comes together with girls for a dancing lesson or some other event during communal evenings. The age of 15-16 years — that is a fact from experience — is the age at which the boy is on the tipping point. If he has a dancing lesson heartthrob or a childhood crush on some girl, he is won over, he has been drawn away from the dangerous plane, i.e. from the danger of tipping over. In Germany we do not really need to be concerned — this is a serious question about which one has previously spoken only with laughter, witty remarks, and dirty jokes, but that, thank God, has stopped — that we bring the boy and girl together too early and encourage sexual intercourse. No, in our climate, with our race and our people, it should be the case that the 16-year old boy sees sexual intercourse as his purest, cleanest and most ideal love.... And, it is the case, that for him from the moment in which he is totally nuts about a girl — I must say it again clearly — a communal masturbating with mates, a communal friendship of a sexual nature with men or boys, is out of the question because he is generally shy before the girl. He is humanly bound. So in that moment the danger is past. We now need to give the opportunity for that to take place. We must put a stop to the whole tendency, which we have today in youth and which we may also have in the SS, to mock a man who walks with a girl, a man who is respectful toward his mother, and a boy who is gentlemanly toward his sister. That is the seedbed for homosexuality. ~Heinrich Himmler~ Rede über Homosexualität vor den SS-Gruppenführern. Feb, 18, 1937. Pg 22.

Ahnenkrieger's tweet photo. Christianity is a Homosexual Männerbund

I recently said to a Hitler Youth leader:

“𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘰 𝘶𝘯-𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦.”

150 years ago someone at a Catholic university wrote a doctoral thesis with the title: “𝘋𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘭?”

From this the whole tendency of Christianity emerges: it is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women.

The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men for the erection and maintenance of this 2,000-year old Bolshevism.

I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome.

I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists.

These Christians were then the worst bacteria which the great city contained, the worst jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were.

The Bolshevism of that time had now the power to become great on the carcass of the dying Rome.

The priesthood of the Christian church which later subjugated the Aryan church in unending conflicts goes on, since the 4th or 5th Century, to long for the celibacy of priests.

It relies on Paul and the very first apostles who derogate the woman as something sinful and permit or recommend marriage as merely a legal way out of prostitution — that is in the Bible — and derogate the procreation of children as a necessary evil.

This priesthood continues along in this way for several centuries until in 1139 the celibacy of priests is fully implemented.

I am furthermore convinced that the way out for the few who do not want to yield to this homosexuality, especially for the country parsons, the majority of whom — more than 50% — I estimate not to be gay, is to procure for themselves in confession the necessary married and single women; I assume that in the monasteries the homosexuality ranges from 90 or 95 to 100%.

If today the trials that concern homosexuality among priests went on again and if we would treat the priests as we do any citizen in Germany, then I would undertake to guarantee for the next three to four years 200 or more such trials.

The realization of the trials fails to take place not because there is a lack of cases, but because we just do not have as many officials and judges as we would need to employ.

Within the next four years very conclusive evidence will be produced — I hope — that the Church organization in its leadership, its priesthood, is for the most part a homosexual erotic Männerbund, that on this basis has been terrorizing humanity for the past 1,800 years, demands from it the greatest blood sacrifice, and has been sadistically perverse in its utterances in the past.

I need only to recall the witch and heretic trials.

The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical Christian attitude, and we also who have been national socialists up to this day — many even who are strict Heathens — have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas.

I know even today very many party members who believe they have to prove the special firmness of their worldview and their own special masculinity through very rowdy and truculent behaviour toward women.

I recognize furthermore a certain tendency in our ranks to exclude women from all events and celebrations.

These same people complain then about the fact that women cling here and there to the church, or are not absolutely 100 percent won over for National Socialism.

They however ought not to complain since they treat women as second class citizens and keep them from all our inner life.

No one needs be surprised then if they are not fully won over for this inner life.

We must be clear about that: the movement, the Worldview has lasting stability if it is supported by the woman, for men comprehend all things with the mind, while the woman comprehends all things with feeling.

The German woman, not the man, has borne the greater sacrifice of blood in the witch and heretic trials.

The priests knew exactly why they burned 5,000-6,000 women: exactly because they emotionally held fast to the old knowledge and the old doctrine and emotionally and instinctively could not be dissuaded from them, while the man had already converted by logic and thought:

“𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵. 𝘞𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺. 𝘐 𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘱𝘵, 𝘐 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘮𝘺𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥.”

I come back to our issue.

I see in the whole movement an excessive masculinization and in this excessive masculinization the seedbed for homosexuality.

I ask you now, if you have the opportunity to discuss these ideas in detail — but not before the entire officer corps — then talk about these things with one man or another.

Please make sure that our men — as it has been initiated by me — come together at the summer solstice celebration with the girls to dance.

I think it absolutely is right that we now and then arrange a dance for the young candidates in the winter to which we now invite not girls who are in any way bad, but rather the very best, and where we give the SS-man the opportunity to dance with girls and to be happy and merry with them.

I think this is particularly important for the single reason that, it helps to assure that, no one ever comes down the wrong road in the direction of homosexuality.

I think it important for a positive reason: we should not be surprised if this or that SS-man marries a completely wrong and racially worthless girl if we do not give the men the opportunity to get to know worthy, racially sound girls.

With the youth I see the need absolutely to take care that the boy of 16-17 years comes together with girls for a dancing lesson or some other event during communal evenings.

The age of 15-16 years — that is a fact from experience — is the age at which the boy is on the tipping point.

If he has a dancing lesson heartthrob or a childhood crush on some girl, he is won over, he has been drawn away from the dangerous plane, i.e. from the danger of tipping over.

In Germany we do not really need to be concerned — this is a serious question about which one has previously spoken only with laughter, witty remarks, and dirty jokes, but that, thank God, has stopped — that we bring the boy and girl together too early and encourage sexual intercourse.

No, in our climate, with our race and our people, it should be the case that the 16-year old boy sees sexual intercourse as his purest, cleanest and most ideal love....

And, it is the case, that for him from the moment in which he is totally nuts about a girl — I must say it again clearly — a communal masturbating with mates, a communal friendship of a sexual nature with men or boys, is out of the question because he is generally shy before the girl.

He is humanly bound.

So in that moment the danger is past.

We now need to give the opportunity for that to take place.

We must put a stop to the whole tendency, which we have today in youth and which we may also have in the SS, to mock a man who walks with a girl, a man who is respectful toward his mother, and a boy who is gentlemanly toward his sister.

That is the seedbed for homosexuality.

~Heinrich Himmler~

Rede über Homosexualität vor den SS-Gruppenführern. Feb, 18, 1937. Pg 22.

0

176

41

91

6K

0

19

1

5

2K

CaliCoastChick

@CaliCoastChick

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users