Zehntausende rumänische Bürger wären um ein Haar gestorben, weil Selensky den Dritten Weltkrieg auslösen wollte.
Am 5. Juni 2026 explodierte eine ukrainische Seedrohne im Hafen von Constanța in unmittelbarer Nähe eines Öllagerterminals. Nach offizieller Darstellung verlor die Drohne durch russische elektronische Störsender die Kontrolle und driftete ab. Die rumänischen Behörden wurden rechtzeitig informiert, sicherten das Gebiet und die Drohne zerstörte sich selbst.
Drei weitere ukrainische Drohnen explodierten außerhalb des Hafens. Es gab keine Verletzten.
Diese Erklärung ist jedoch aus technischer Sicht schwer nachvollziehbar. Ukrainische Seedrohnen dieses Typs sind mit Satellitenkommunikation und funktionierenden Bordkameras ausgestattet, die Echtzeitbilder übertragen.
Die Drohne verfing sich in Antipollutionsbojen und blieb liegen. Über die laufenden Kameras konnte der ukrainische Operator in Echtzeit sehen, dass Personen die Drohne aus weniger als zehn Metern Entfernung filmten und damit enttarnten. Trotz des angeblichen vollständigen Kontrollverlusts war er offenbar weiterhin in der Lage, die Drohne per Fernbefehl kontrolliert zu zünden – und zwar erst, nachdem sie entdeckt und gefilmt worden war.
Kritische Stimmen in Rumänien, darunter der Bürgerjournalist Sorin Faur, gehen daher davon aus, dass die Drohne bewusst auf das Öllagerterminal und das angrenzende Ammonium-Nitrat-Lager ausgerichtet war.
Ein Treffer hätte eine massive Explosion auslösen und große Teile der Stadt zerstört. – bei gleichzeitiger Vernichtung aller technischer Beweise an Bord der Drohne über die vordefinierte Route und das eigentliche Ziel.
Hätte die Drohne ihr Ziel erreicht und wäre der Vorfall später Russland zugeschrieben worden, hätte dies zu einer schweren Eskalation geführt.
Dann wäre ein NATO-Mitglied angegriffen worden und der Verteidigungsfall wäre ausgerufen worden. Dann wären wir jetzt vermutlich bereits im Krieg!
Die Tatsache, dass die Drohne erst nach ihrer optischen Enttarnung durch den Operator kontrolliert gesprengt wurde, macht es mehr als nur wahrscheinlich, dass es sich nicht um einen simplen technischen Unfall, sondern um eine Operation handelte um die NATO aktiv in den Krieg zu ziehen.
Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass die offizielle Version stimmt und die Sprengstoff-Drohnen irgendwie zufällig an diese Stelle in den Hafen von Constanța gespült wurden, liegt bei nahe null!
---
Notice how the Brussels ghouls, including the Romanian president, have been quiet in regards to the failed Ukrainian false flag in Romania?
If it went according to Zelensky's plan, it would trigger Beirut 2020 scale of explosion, and have taken thousands of lives, and caused mass destruction to most of the city, to be blamed on Russia, of course.
Meanwhile, Zelensky is parading around Europe and meeting with the so called E3 leaders and King Charles, discussing further impoverishment of European tax payers, as if nothing happened at all.
Weak men create hard times.
Postarea cu drona filmată și cu dovezile că o dronă eșuată nu poate ocoli un dig, să întoarcă la 180 de grade chiar la capătul digului și apoi sa facă unghi drept direct către dana unde este Terminal Oil, dintre zecile de dane din port, am postat-o aici, de unde e preluată în mii de distribuiri în toate țările lumii, în sute de mii de vizualizări în doar câteva ore.
Europenii sunt pur și simplu oripilați, nu le vine sa creadă ce văd, filmarea aia cu drona ucraineană care zăcea între balize nu o știe nimeni din afara țării, cum nu o știu nici ai noștri, pentru că nicio televiziune nu o popularizeaza nici la ei, cum nici la noi nu apare pe nicăieri, e omerta pe subiect, se încearcă distragerea atenției.
Și te întrebi de ce, pentru că nu convine propagandei Bruxelles-ului care trebuie să spele bani prin ajutoare date Ucrainei sau nu se mai vând armele, nu se mai semnează contractele din programul SAFE cu vânzătorii de fier vechi care riscă să rămână cu tancurile în bătătură?
Iar minciuna aia cu bruiajul rușilor care au preluat controlul dronei este absolut pentru retardați. Păi dacă erau în stare rușii să facă asta, nu o făceau și când aceleași drone au aruncat în aer podul Crimeei sau când au atacat Moscova?
Ce e mizeria asta, de ce se încearcă punerea batistei pe țambal? Europa trebuie sa afle, lumea întreaga trebuie sa afle, dacă ai noștri, guvernanți și populație dorm în papuci și se scarpină în buric, hai să trezim celelalte națiuni care știu să fie demne, care nu au trecut prin istorie cu Servus.
Doar în ei ne mai stă speranța, așa că vă rog să faceți cunoscut tuturor atentatul criminal al Ucrainei asupra României, aratati-le tuturor filmul cu drona ucraineană controlată de ucraineni, ghidată cu țintă clară Terminal Oil, care ar fi spulberat jumate din harta orasului Constanța: clădiri și oameni erau rași de pe fata Pământului, dacă nu erau acele balize.
O țară din afara NATO a atacat o țară NATO, e mai mult decat evident. Unde e articolul 5? Unde e expulzarea ambasadorului și închiderea Ambasadei Ucrainei la București? Ucrainenii mai au canal de televiziune exclusiv în limba lor, din banii noștri, la televiziunea de stat? Mai primesc bani din impozitele noastre să își plimbe câinii și bebelușii născuți aici, câte 2-3, în timp ce ai noștri își numără banii și decid ca ăsta nu e un moment bun pentru un copil, ca avem de crescut lepre cu banii noștri?
Cat mai suportăm jegurile astea care nu au nicio jenă sa ne extermine în masă și acum nici măcar scuze nu își cer?
Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They're convincing a growing number of services to adopt it. Google's Play Integrity API and Apple's App Attest API are very similar. Apple brought it to the web via Privacy Pass, which Google intends on doing too.
Google's Play Integrity API requires hardware attestation for the strong integrity level and is gradually phasing in requiring it for the more commonly used device integrity level. Apple already has it as a requirement. Over the long term, this will increasingly lock out hardware and OS competition.
The purpose of these systems is disallowing people from using hardware and software not approved by Apple or Google. This is wrongly presented as being a security feature. Banks and government services are the main ones adopting it but Apple and Google are encouraging every service to use it.
Apple's Privacy Pass brought hardware attestation to the web to help with passing captchas on their own hardware. Many people saw that as harmless since few sites would be willing to lock out non-Apple-hardware users. Apple and Google are both likely to bring broader hardware attestation to the web.
Google's reCAPTCHA is planning an approach where they use Privacy Pass on Apple hardware, their own approach on Google Mobile Services Android devices and a QR code scanning system to require an iOS or Google certified Android device for Windows and other systems:
https://t.co/7rQnioRa8A
Banking and government services increasingly require using a mobile app where they can use attestation to force using an Apple or Google approved device and OS. Apple's privacy pass, Google's 'cancelled' Web Environment Integrity and now reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification are bringing this to the web.
Current media coverage for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification misunderstands it and the impact of it. They're bringing a hardware attestation requirement to Windows, desktop Linux, OpenBSD, etc. by requiring a QR scan from a certified smartphone to pass reCAPTCHA in some cases. They could expand it more.
Control over reCAPTCHA puts Google in a position where they can require having either iOS or a certified Android device to use an enormous amount of the web. Google defines certification requirements for Android which includes forcing bundling Google Chrome, etc. It's enormously anti-competitive.
Google's Play Integrity API bans using GrapheneOS despite it being far more secure than anything they permit. It also bans using any other alternative. This isn't somehow specific to an AOSP-based OS. You can't avoid this by using a mobile OS based on FreeBSD instead. You'll just be more locked out.
Google's Play Integrity API permits devices with no security patches for 10 years. The device integrity level can be bypassed via spoofing but they can detect it quite well and block it once it starts being done at scale. The strong integrity level requires leaked keys from TEEs/SEs to bypass it.
It doesn't provide a useful security feature, but it does lock out competition very well. Services requiring Apple App Attest or Google Play Integrity are primarily helping to lock in Apple and Google having a duopoly for mobile devices. Play Integrity is more relevant due to AOSP being open source.
Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them.
Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they're directly participating in locking out competition via their own services. Requiring people to have an Apple device or Google-certified Android device is anti-competition, not security.
reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that.
This isn't about security or any missing functionality. GrapheneOS can be verified via hardware attestation. Google bans using GrapheneOS for Play Integrity because we don't license Google Mobile Services and conform to anti-competitive rules already found to be illegal in South Korea and elsewhere.
Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.
.@vonderleyen "The European #AgeVerification app is technically ready. It respects the highest privacy standards in the world. It's open-source, so anyone can check the code..."
I did. It didn't take long to find what looks like a serious #privacy issue.
The app goes to great lengths to protect the AV data AFTER collection (is_over_18: true is AES-GCM'd); it does so pretty well.
But, the source image used to collect that data is written to disk without encryption and not deleted correctly.
For NFC biometric data:
It pulls DG2 and writes a lossless PNG to the filesystem. It's only deleted on success. If it fails for any reason (user clicks back, scan fails & retries, app crashes etc), the full biometric image remains on the device in cache. This is protected with CE keys at the Android level, but the app makes no attempt to encrypt/protect them.
For selfie pictures:
Different scenario. These images are written to external storage in lossless PNG format, but they're never deleted. Not a cache... long-term storage. These are protected with DE keys at the Android level, but again, the app makes no attempt to encrypt/protect them.
This is akin to taking a picture of your passport/government ID using the camera app and keeping it just in case. You can encrypt data taken from it until you're blue in the face... leaving the original image on disk is crazy & unnecessary.
From a #GDPR standpoint:
Biometric data collected is special category data. If there's no lawful basis to retain it after processing, that's potentially a material breach.
https://t.co/PKQ0DWSYzL
In 2016, Dutch newspapers reported reported that Ukrainians murdered their own Russian-speaking population. 10,000 had already been murdered and 1.6 million Russian speaking people in the Donbass had to flee their home, Politicians are lying, the article is removed kept it
Before the war:
1) Iran didn't control the Strait Of Hormuz, now it does
2) Iran oil was sanctioned, now it's not
3) Iran was not building a nuke, now it will
4) US bases in the Gulf were assets, now liabilities
5) Inflation was declining, now increasing
Definitely winning!
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today.
I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.
It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC.
May God bless America.
În al Doilea Război Mondial au murit aproximativ 50 de milioane de oameni. Au murit ruși, americani, români, unguri, japonezi, chinezi, polonezi, romi, evrei, francezi, englezi etc.
Și totuși, avem un număr care ne este fluturat în fața ochilor cu o insistență suparătoare: cele 6 milioane de evrei morți, prezentați adesea ca fiind cei mai napăstuiți de soartă. Dar cu restul de 88% ce facem?
Nu o să mă apuc acum să disec cifra de 6 milioane, pentru că unii mi-ar spune că neg cu totul Holocaustul. Dar există niște întrebări legate de proporții care, din punctul meu de vedere, nu par să se potrivească cu modul în care sunt prezentate lucrurile. Nu am o poziție fermă, fără să fi cercetat în profunzime, dar ceva îmi dă de gândit.
Din ce motiv cele 44 de milioane de oameni sunt considerate mai puțin importante decât cele 6 milioane? Din ce motiv pentru cele 44 de milioane nu există atâtea monumente, zile de comemorare, ONG-uri, legi și multe altele? Există cumva o rasă superioară? Eu nu cred asta...
Nu știu dacă știți, dar în al Doilea Război Mondial au murit aproximativ 27 de milioane de cetățeni sovietici. Dacă nu ar fi fost sovieticii, cel mai probabil Hitler nu ar fi pierdut războiul. Nu merită și ei o comemorare pe măsură? Sau sunt văzuți ca o subspecie umană? Voi asta credeți? Nu mi se pare corect...
Pentru unul mumă, pentru altul ciumă...
Why was Ukraine receiving "aid" in cash from Raiffeisen Bank in Vienna? Why was it not legally wired through bank accounts?
As you probably know, 75 million dollars and 9 kilos of gold were seized by Hungarian authorities today.
Meanwhile, EU CITIZENS have a cap on cash payments and cash withdrawals.
BTW, wasn't Ukraine against Raiffeisen for still operating in Russia? 👀😉
The Kiev regime is now hunting for cannon fodder among ethnic Romanians in the villages of occupied Northern Bucovina. Romanians who resist forced mobilization are being fired upon by armed Ukrainian soldiers.
I cannot believe that the traitors in Bucharest still refer to Ukraine as “our ally” when the Kiev regime treats the Romanian people in Northern Bucovina this way.
West intel agencies can determine Navalny death (Ecuador dart frog poison) without having access to the body (in Russia), but they just can't seem to figure out who blew up Nord Stream or anything about Epstein.
Conveniently announced at Munich Security Conference.
The illegitimate President of Romania rejects the US report that confirms there was no Russian interference in the 2024 elections, continues to blame Russia