@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 The shit you are providing is eaither unrelated, supports anthropogenic global warming, or just a straight up lie. What uni did you get your engineering degree from and what field of engineering is it?
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 Would you care to explain how it contradicts the laws of physics? Climate change is a net in vs net out equation. CO2 does absorb outgoing infrared and it does re-emit it. More CO2 means more outgoing radiation gets re-emitted back to earths surface. Net out decreases. Simple.
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 For one the known greenhouse effect. You even acknowledge the temperature increase. This temperature increase is occuring faster than at most points during the earths history including mass extinctions. Those are facts.
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 So let me get this straight. representing data on a graph with the scale actually fitting the data is misrepresenting it? Do you know how a graph works? Most of your data is either straight up incorrect or its abundant that you dont actually know enough to interpret it.
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 2/2 A true representation if trying to display how climate is average temperature is changing now compared to the past would be to show a longer period with the scale matching the magnitude of change and not just picking a bigger scale to make it look smaller.
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 No, it is. You have an australian flag in your bio and are using farenheit with a scale relevant to human daily life to represent the change in global average temperature. You are trying to minimise it as much as possible. 1/2
@RoyPentland@CoppockRog62072 This graph actually is the misleading one, and the text at the bottom is incorrect. If you put the average rate of temperature increase from the end permian mass extinction event on your graph it would, be 10s of times flatter than what we are experiencing. Was it significant?
@xxMasterYolo420@ryankatzrosene It means absolutely nothing... except for the mass extinctions that involved rapid climatic changes that occured slower than the change we are causing now...
@TiberiusChris@KatraApplesauce@ryankatzrosene So you're saying that us currently being on the trajectory to match the worst mass extinction in earths history over a duration of 1000 years when it took nature in the real of 60,000 years isnt a problem? You are exactly outlining why its a huge problem. It really doesnt compare
@RositaDaz48@AntonyGreenElec@rusty3136 They won 86 seats on first preferences they won 8 by getting more than 50% of the vote in a seat. What system do you want if you want a candidate to win more than 50% of the votes in a seat to actually win? Preferential is actually the best way to do that.
@ben_nexhip@GrogsGamut And not a single Indian australian that voted in the last election came here during albos first term. Perhaps not openly antagonising a group will make them more likely to vote for you lol.
@wakeuptotheleft@mattjcan We have an endless supply of wind and solar energy that's cheaper and won't raise the temperature of the earth. Why go back to a more expensive, more polluting, limited supply of energy?
@ilda_talk@robbierocket7@australian This is an online poll on a murdoch website. This result means literally nothing. It's like polling a church for how many believe in god and then declaring that the overwhelming majority of australians are religious.