This seems to be a recurring pattern.
Sometimes it's Tangem, sometimes it's Trezor, tomorrow it will be someone else.
The formula is always the same:
create doubt around a competitor's security, then position Keystone as the solution.
But when asked a legitimate security-related question, the conversation suddenly goes quiet.
If security is truly the priority, answering difficult questions should be easier than turning competitors into marketing material.
https://t.co/HwpVtZxXSp
@KeystoneWallet Hi @KeystoneWallet,
If security truly is your top priority, then this question deserves a clear answer.
I believe your followers โ and everyone trusting your products with their assets โ would appreciate one.
๐
https://t.co/ZwnZQIySG8
"No hardware wallet is unbreakable."
Agreed.
But if physical attacks are your main selling point, why is downloading firmware from a website and connecting the wallet to a computer still part of the update process?
Just trying to understand where the real threat model begins and ends.
๐จ ALERT ๐จ
@coinbureau has discovered that crypto assets sometimes go down as well as up.
People who have been here longer than two weeks:
โFirst time?โ ๐
@KeystoneWallet@KeystoneWallet An uncomfortable question, or are you just avoiding answering it?
By the way, this post was clearly triggered by my earlier post today. You got asked an uncomfortable question there as well and, unsurprisingly, never answered it.
"No hardware wallet is unbreakable."
Agreed.
But if physical attacks are your main selling point, why is downloading firmware from a website and connecting the wallet to a computer still part of the update process?
Just trying to understand where the real threat model begins and ends.
@KeystoneWallet@jp0010110 That's a different claim though.
"Any hardware wallet can be broken given enough time and money" is not the same as "most hardware wallets can be physically broken into."
So which hardware wallets were you referring to in the original post?
@KeystoneWallet@Trezor Glad to hear I'm not blocked. ๐
Now we're back to the original question:
Could you list which hardware wallets you're referring to and provide links to the published research or successful attacks against each one?
After seeing @Trezorโs recent post, @KeystoneWallet concluded that โmost hardware walletsโ can be physically broken into.
When I asked them to name those wallets and provide the research supporting that claim, they blocked me.
What do you think, why? ๐
โCould you list which hardware wallets youโre referring to and provide links to the published research or successful attacks against each one?โ
After seeing @Trezorโs recent post, @KeystoneWallet concluded that โmost hardware walletsโ can be physically broken into.
When I asked them to name those wallets and provide the research supporting that claim, they blocked me.
What do you think, why? ๐
โCould you list which hardware wallets youโre referring to and provide links to the published research or successful attacks against each one?โ
@KeystoneWallet Could you list which hardware wallets youโre referring to and provide links to the published research or successful attacks against each one?
๐ฎ๐ท๐บ๐ธ Iran's Fars News just dropped something wild.
According to them, American officials have been privately messaging Tehran telling them to ignore Trump's posts about a deal because they're "primarily for promotional purposes and media consumption."
His own officials are telling an adversary to tune out the president.
If true, the U.S. negotiating position is being undermined from the inside before it even begins.
@KobeissiLetter
Strange hearing lectures about free speech from a country where universities are pressured over protests, journalists get dragged through courts, and people can lose jobs over a single social media post. The UK has its own problems, but the US is also moving toward โfree speech only for opinions our side likes.
Funny hearing this from a country where free speech depends on which billionaire, campus donor, or political tribe gets offended first.
UK arrests you for tweets. US just destroys your career instead. Very different freedom models.
Strange hearing lectures about free speech from a country where universities are pressured over protests, journalists get dragged through courts, and people can lose jobs over a single social media post. The UK has its own problems, but the US is also moving toward โfree speech only for opinions our side likes.
Funny hearing this from a country where free speech depends on which billionaire, campus donor, or political tribe gets offended first.
UK arrests you for tweets. US just destroys your career instead. Very different freedom models.
@stockbella@elonmusk Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR)
This is arguably the most ironic example in modern politics.
Name: "Liberal" and "Democratic."
Ideology: Ultra-nationalism, imperialism, and authoritarianism.