We shouldn't be allowing this much foreign subversion in Canadian law enforcement.
Despite any lie that we may be told, police naturally bring their own in group preferences with them while on duty and that's why we want them to be our people, not people with high foreign subversion liability.
And your reasoning for claiming that they're anti semitic is what exactly? That a 1930s German regime persecuted Jews while ten times as many white Christians died in response to it?
What exactly does this org in Canada have to do with that regime? Maybe your Jewish in group preference org should spend your effort re-evaluating your paranoid accusations. And ripping off their colour scheme for your poster is in bad taste.
If anything it is your org that is vilifying Canadians for loyalty to their nation.
The Local Militia Summit that will be held annually in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, joining local border security militias from around the country for a weekend of national promotion and comradery.
B'nai Brith is free to express their in group preference for Jews in this paranoid fashion.
But their hypersensitivity to nationalist politics in Canada does not warrant the kind of extreme level of accomodation they're demanding.
https://t.co/zNQxAf6CE2
Do you know how Europeans became lands owners in Canada?
Sikhs Canadians contributed immensely in the farming sector. Sikh farmers in Canada bought land by paying fair market value vs Europeans who often stole it from First Nations.
Europeans acquired land in Canada through treaties, the Indian Act, and the displacement of First Nationsvia government policies and settlement.
New Methods of Displacement were invented to acquire land such as:
Numbered Treaties:
The Canadian government signed treaties with First Nations to clear land for settlement and resource extraction, often promising reserves and rights that were poorly honored.
The Reserve System:
Officials relocated First Nations to small, often isolated parcels of land while opening vast traditional territories to European homesteaders.
The Pass System:
The government restricted First Nations individuals from leaving reserves without a pass, preventing them from accessing their traditional lands and economies.
Enfranchisement Policies:
The Indian Act forced or pressured First Nations to give up their legal status in exchange for land parcels, systematically dismantling collective land ownership.
@JeremyMacKenzie US leadership will tolerate anything that gets them a bigger bag of shekels.
The priority of leadership in both countries is shekel worship, not preservation of national heritage.
The industrial revolution that transformed USA in to a mechanized industrial power was engineered and built domestically, not with cheap foreign labour and mongrelization.
Trump is larping as a nationalist from this era when in truth he, like Carney, worship shekels and will never capitulate on their loyalty to borderless economic zones in favour of consideration for ethnic identity.
It's kinda chic to obey traffic laws.
Simple choices behind the wheel can make all the difference. That's our kind of aesthetic.
Have a safe weekend, Edmonton.
No white nationalist is going to pick strawberries in 110° heat for any price.
But they still expect strawberries on the grocery store shelf.
They demonize the immigrant labor while enjoying the fruits of that labor.
Literally.
Indian garbage culture is unacceptable. Every Indian detained for deportation should be used as labour to clean public spaces littered by Indians while they await deportation.
The Conservative Party's two deputy leaders: Melissa Lantsman, pro-gender Marxism, pro universal basic income, in group Jewish preference and; Tim Uppal, multicultural community advocate, in group Sikh preference.
What are the Conservatives "conserving" exactly?