Candace Owens News

The #1 Candace Owens Clips & Commentary Source | Fan run account

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Sources:
https://t.co/tTcwNuBVTL
https://t.co/oULLoAZkhP

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Fun fact: Brigitte's Macron’s family has been making macarons in Amiens since 1872. The French press called him "le Macron d'Amiens" and I've never recovered 😂

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Her family sells two million macarons a year and they still went with lawyers instead of a gift basket 🙃

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@BlindOwl42 @LionelMedia Fair. Fewer windows, fewer witnesses. Architect really thought of everything 😂

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Source:
https://t.co/FHc2stJ4A6

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Defense asked for Q3 2029. Prosecutors asked for Jan 31, 2028. Erika's filing asked for 2027. The judge gave everyone Nov 9 🙃

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

I'm sorry, Erika. But you are not the defendant.

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@Rach4Patriarchy Kristen Bell said she cries about once a week with two kids and a marriage. Honestly sounds low 😂

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Source:
https://t.co/MrMeo2VhUj

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

CNN named him as CharlesXII on July 10, 2020 and Fox accepted his resignation the same day. Today he's posting about racial discrimination 🙃

[Baron Coleman @baroncoleman]

Also in 2020, Blake was exposed as CharlesXII, the raging racist poster who attacked Black people, Asians, and more.

This is TPUSA in 2026. Irony without shame.

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@baroncoleman Source:
https://t.co/MrMeo2UK4L

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@RealCandaceO Ren has 4,151 followers and that post is sitting at 322K views. Those numbers don't usually go together 😂

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@RealCandaceO @KarlWuckert Daily Wire dropped her March 22, 2024. The Macrons sued her July 23, 2025. And the theory is an ad read is what finally got her 😂

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

@fonzofoz @RealCandaceO Trump's term runs to Jan 20, 2029, so he'd still be in. It's the defense's Q3 2029 ask that lands after 🙃

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Candace's rooftop thread has clips stamped 12:35, 12:36 and 12:42. Her read: someone went back up on the Losee roof about 20 minutes after the shot, and it's plausible that's when the screwdriver got dropped. Watch them yourself. #whokilledcharliekirk

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Candace's last week before maternity leave:
Mon: statue vandal update, Katie Zacharia
Tue: new UVU footage from the Losee rooftop, Brian Cole, Guilfoyle
Wed: Vivek, another middle school vs an Erika Kirk visit, Allie Stuckey vs horror movies
Which one are you sending to the group chat?

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Kasia went live for almost 3 hours yesterday on Erika's new interview. If you missed it, it's up 👇 @dailyfreddo https://t.co/lbn83NcjYn

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Owen says save the last one because it's comedically absurd. 164K people have checked so far 😂

[Owen Benjamin 🐻 @OwenBenjamin]

Today I used a few examples to show signs someone is lying. Case study Erika Kirk. The last one is comedically absurd.

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

She checked one "former fan" account and found almost 200 posts about one creator in a single day. That's not disappointment, that's a shift schedule 💀

[dailyfreddo @dailyfreddo]

Something I've noticed time and time again...

Accounts allegedly pretending to be someone's followers will slowly start planting doubt about a creator, for example. They'll dig up an old story about them or purposely "misunderstand" something the creator said, then publish a post expressing their disappointment.

It happens slowly, with multiple accounts doing the same thing. Suddenly, people start questioning that creator's character and intentions.

Then, seemingly out of nowhere, these accounts become outraged over one particular thing the creator supposedly said. Even though the creator didn't actually say it the way they're presenting it, their interpretation becomes louder than the actual substance of what was said.

They take over comment sections, live chats, and timelines. Posts about the controversy start appearing EVERYWHERE. And they're so convincing that their talking points begin to infect the real fan base.

The doubt has been planted.

Now the actual followers start joining in the outrage. Meanwhile, the accounts that started it all double down, increasing the number of posts, comments, and accusations.

Suddenly, the creator's credibility is shaken. And no matter what they say or don't say, hundreds of these accounts will jump in with the same arguments, twisting their words, dismissing their explanations, and making sure the outrage never dies down.

But here's the clever part.

These accounts aren't presenting themselves as haters. They're pretending to be "loyal fans who used to love this person but are now so disappointed that they can no longer support them."

And that's what makes it so effective. Because when genuine followers see what appears to be hundreds of other fans turning against someone, they start wondering whether they should feel the same way.

Let me give you an example.

I recently noticed an account repeatedly commenting under one of my posts, desperately trying to spark outrage over a controversial topic that day. The person was attacking a creator they claimed they "used to follow" but now absolutely hated because they were supposedly a liar.

Something about it caught my attention, so I checked their profile.

And surprise, surprise...

Almost 200 posts and comments in ONE DAY.

All about that ONE creator.

One person. One day. Almost 200 interactions dedicated to attacking the same individual.

Now, does that automatically prove the account was fake or part of some coordinated operation? No. But it's exactly the kind of behavior that makes me question whether I'm looking at genuine disappointment or someone deliberately trying to manufacture outrage.

And when you see multiple accounts behaving in a similar way, repeating the same talking points, using the same interpretations, and presenting themselves as former supporters, it's worth paying attention.

Because sometimes what looks like a spontaneous wave of public outrage might not be nearly as spontaneous as you think.

My advice?

Learn to recognize when this might be happening.

Don't immediately jump on the outrage bandwagon just because your timeline is suddenly full of people telling you how disappointed you should be.

Go back and listen to what the person ACTUALLY said. Not someone's interpretation of it. Not a conveniently edited clip. Not an emotional post from a stranger claiming to be a former fan.

Take some time to think for yourself, question what you're being shown, and keep your distance from the mob mentality.

Because once someone successfully plants doubt in your mind, it's incredibly easy to start interpreting everything that person says or does through that doubt.

And sometimes, that's exactly the point.

(These are my thoughts and observations - I'm not stating anything as a fact)

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

https://t.co/FHc2stJCpE

[Candace Owens News @CandaceFiles]

Both sides told the judge they plan to send juror questionnaires to 3,000 people. Every one of them is going to hear about those shoes 💀

[CANDACE @candaceoshow]

Is Wearing Converses Enough To Warrant The Death Penalty?

"Why do you believe that's Mr. Robinson?"

"The shoes are the same."