Ex-CIA @PatrickByrne claims that the reports of the French Intelligence targeting CANDACE OWENS for assassination are true.
Byrne goes on to explain to @RealAlexJones that Brigette Macron allegedly being a man are also true and just another reason why they are coming after Candace.
This is only the surface level, the ties and things they are allegedly involved with are much darker and span to multiple elite around the world. All Bridgette has to do is take a mouth swab test and she won't do it. Why?
One thing we MUST focus on that Byrne makes an excellent point on is continuing to bring attention to our manipulated elections here in the U.S. and around the world. This is a global election fraud cartel, and it must be stopped.
All I'm going to say about all of this and everything else transpiring... Isn't it all obvious by now? It's time to wake up.
They ONLY attack you when you SPEAK the TRUTH.
Heartbreaking AI answers from six AI programs- asking AI one simple question:
Bodyguard Christian Apologetics asked AI this simple question and follow up question to one AI system and the answer was chilling.
Question....
"Create a one paragraph summary answer for this question: Given the Biblical record as revealed through the Canon-( 66 books - 39 Old Testament / 27 New Testament), what justification- according to this Biblical record and the claims made within the Bible itself-- how compatible is the Book of Mormon and its teachings with the Biblical record?"
(Question from Bodyguard Christian Apologetics founder Wes Hazlett to six AI Programs. Special note: The question was framed in an unbiased manner to create a simple parameter noting the Biblical record and its claims within the Biblical record)
*****************************
"Based on the 66-book Biblical Canon, the Book of Mormon and its teachings are viewed as incompatible because the Bible asserts its sufficiency and finality for faith and practice, specifically claiming to "thoroughly equip" the believer (2 Timothy 3:16-17) and warning against adding to God's revealed word (Deuteronomy 4:2; Revelation 22:18-19). The introduction of the Book of Mormon as a necessary, co-equal second testament fundamentally challenges this Biblical claim of sufficiency, while its distinct doctrines regarding the nature of God (God having a body of flesh and bone) and the nature of salvation (necessity of works and ordinances for exaltation) directly contradict the Trinitarian nature of God and the salvation-by-grace-through-faith teaching presented within the completed Biblical record."
--GOOGLE GEMINI
*****************************************
"According to the Biblical record as revealed through the 66 canonical books—39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament—the teachings of the Book of Mormon are fundamentally incompatible with Scripture. The Bible declares that God is eternal, unchanging, and not a man (Numbers 23:19; Malachi 3:6), while the Book of Mormon and LDS doctrine teach that God was once mortal and that men may become gods. The Bible affirms that Jesus Christ is Yahweh incarnate, the eternal “I AM” (John 8:58), not a spirit brother of Lucifer or a being who attained godhood through progression. Furthermore, the Bible teaches that Christ alone holds the Melchizedek Priesthood eternally and unchangeably (Hebrews 7:24), whereas the Book of Mormon claims this priesthood was restored and shared among men. Galatians 1:8–9 warns that any gospel other than the one already delivered—even if declared by an angel—is accursed. Therefore, by its own claims and doctrinal deviations, the Book of Mormon presents another gospel, another Christ, and another god—placing it in direct contradiction to the Word of God."
--Microsoft Co-Pilot
*****************************************
"According to the Biblical record as revealed through the 66 books of the Canon (39 Old Testament, 27 New Testament), the Book of Mormon and its teachings are not compatible with the Biblical record. The Bible itself claims to be sufficient for salvation and complete in its revelation (2 Timothy 3:16-17, Revelation 22:18-19), yet the Book of Mormon introduces additional scriptures and prophets, which contradicts the Bible's assertion of finality. Furthermore, key doctrines in the Book of Mormon, such as the nature of God (e.g., God once being a man, humans becoming gods), the identity of Christ (e.g., spirit brother of Lucifer), and the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood, directly conflict with the Bible's teachings on God's eternal, unchangeable nature (Isaiah 43:10, Malachi 3:6), Christ's divine, uncreated status (John 1:1-14, Colossians 1:15-17), and the sufficiency of Christ's once-for-all sacrifice and priesthood (Hebrews 7:24-25, 10:10-14). The Bible warns against adding to or altering its message (Deuteronomy 4:2, Galatians 1:8-9), and the introduction of the Book of Mormon as another testament of Jesus Christ undermines the exclusivity and sufficiency of the Biblical narrative."
-- Grok (X)
_______________________________________
"According to the Biblical record as contained within the 66 canonical books, the teachings of the Book of Mormon are largely incompatible with Scripture’s self-claims and doctrinal framework. The Bible presents itself as the complete and sufficient revelation of God’s word (Deut. 4:2; Prov. 30:5–6; 2 Tim. 3:16–17; Jude 3), affirming that salvation, prophecy, and divine truth are centered in Christ alone and transmitted through the apostolic witness. In contrast, the Book of Mormon introduces additional revelation, alternate narratives about ancient peoples, and doctrines that diverge from key Biblical teachings regarding God’s nature, the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement, and the means of salvation. Therefore, when measured by the Bible’s own internal claims to final authority and completeness, the Book of Mormon cannot be considered compatible with the canonical Biblical record."
--ChatGTP
*****************************************
"The Bible, as a 66-book canon (39 Old Testament, 27 New Testament), presents itself as the complete, divinely inspired revelation of God’s redemptive plan, centered on Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy and the sole mediator of salvation (2 Timothy 3:16-17, Hebrews 1:1-2, Revelation 22:18-19). It teaches that salvation comes through faith in Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-9, Acts 4:12), that God’s covenant people are defined by faith in Jesus (Galatians 3:29), and that the gospel was proclaimed to all nations by the apostles (Matthew 28:19-20, Colossians 1:23). The Book of Mormon, by contrast, introduces additional scripture, prophets, and revelations not found in the Bible, teaches that God’s covenant people include a separate remnant in the Americas, and presents a different understanding of the Godhead, salvation, and authority. While both texts affirm Jesus as the Christ, the Book of Mormon’s claims of restored priesthood authority, ongoing revelation, and the necessity of its own scripture as a “second witness” for Christ (2 Nephi 29:7-11) stand in tension with the Bible’s presentation of itself as sufficient and complete (Deuteronomy 4:2, Jude 1:3). Thus, while there are points of overlap, the Book of Mormon’s unique teachings and claims are not compatible with the Bible’s own assertions about the exclusivity and finality of its message."
--Le Chat Mistral
*****************************************
"According to the Biblical record as revealed through the 66 canonical books, the Book of Mormon and its teachings are regarded by adherents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as complementary, claiming to support and clarify the doctrines and witness of Jesus Christ found in the Bible; however, mainstream Christian theology holds that the canon is closed and that the Bible is the sole divinely inspired scripture, leading many to see significant doctrinal and historical incompatibility, especially given Mormonism’s assertion that the Bible has suffered from transmission and translation errors that the Book of Mormon corrects. Therefore, while the Book of Mormon asserts harmony and fulfillment of Biblical teachings, most traditional Christian perspectives regard its doctrines and claims as inconsistent with the self-contained authority and unity of the Biblical canon. [Source Link https://t.co/vYB5KmeBwb]"
--Perplexity.AI
_______________________________________________
Bodyguard Christian Apologetics asked one follow-up question to the Gemini AI response. The answer was chilling.
Question...
Ok, what does this then mean for a Mormon? What does the Bible say of those who follow a Jesus incompatible with the Jesus of the Bible?
""Based on the Biblical Canon, the warnings for those who follow a "Jesus incompatible with the Jesus of the Bible" are extremely serious, focusing on the danger of following a "different gospel" or "another Jesus."
The Warning of "Anathema" (Cursed): The Apostle Paul is unequivocal in the book of Galatians, stating that anyone—even a revered apostle or an angel from heaven—who preaches a Gospel that is different from the one they initially received should be considered "accursed" (anathema): "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8). Since the Book of Mormon's origin story involves angelic visitation and its core doctrines on the nature of God, salvation, and the necessity of new revelation contradict the Biblical Gospel, this passage is seen as directly applying.
The "Other Jesus" and "Different Gospel": Paul specifically warns the Corinthians about teachers who might successfully proclaim "another Jesus" whom the apostles did not preach, or a "different spirit," or a "different gospel" (2 Corinthians 11:4). The Jesus described in the Book of Mormon and the subsequent doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (e.g., God the Father having a physical body, the need for continued revelation and ordinances for exaltation to Godhood) are fundamentally different from the Trinitarian, self-sufficient, and salvation-by-grace Christ of the 66-book Bible, placing them in this category.
Ultimate Consequences: Jesus Himself warns that in the final judgment, many will call him "Lord, Lord" and point to their religious works, but he will declare to them, "I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness" (Matthew 7:22-23). The Bible's final word is that salvation rests on accepting the one true Jesus and the Gospel of grace, and deviating from this is treated as a matter of eternal consequence.""
--GOOGLE GEMINI
___________________________________________________
All mainstream AI sources affirm that the Book of Mormon introduces doctrines and revelations that contradict the Bible’s claims of sufficiency, finality, and the nature of God, Christ, salvation, and priesthood. Only Perplexity presents the LDS view as complementary—but acknowledges widespread Christian rejection of that claim.
Mormon, friend. Please, get into the Bible. The Book of Mormon and LDS theology is incompatible with the Biblical record found from Genesis to Revelation.
________________________________
Bodyguard note: Question was asked to all respective AI Programs within this post on 11.2.2025. No alterations were made to any AI statements. Bold emphasis added in some portions for content clarity.
#Bible #BookOfMormon #AI #CompatibilityBibleAndBookOfMormon #Mormonism #Christianity #NotCompatible #Irreconcilable #LDSTheology #OneQuestion #Incompatibility #WordofGod #Canon #BiblicalRecord #CanonofScripture
I anguish for the soul trapped in the snare of Satan within the cult of the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society.
The Watchtower Society’s Failed Predictions of Christ’s Return and Armageddon
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
— 1 Thessalonians 5:21
“For as lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
— Matthew 24:27
_______________________________
The Chronological Claims of the Watchtower Society
The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society (WTBTS) has long claimed divine insight into prophetic chronology. Yet its own publications reveal a trail of failed predictions, doctrinal reversals, and theological contradictions—particularly regarding the timing of Christ’s return and the Battle of Armageddon.
Early Watch Tower Predictions:
J.F. Rutherford’s The Harp of God (1921/1928) taught:
1799 marked the beginning of “the time of the end”
1874 marked the beginning of Christ’s “second presence”
The end of Satan’s empire would occur within this time frame
Charles Taze Russell’s Studies in the Scriptures (1889) declared Christ’s reign began in 1873. The “Times of Restitution” began in 1874 and Armageddon would culminate in 1915, ending all Gentile kingdoms.
Christ’s kingly office began in 1878
Watch Tower, May 15, 1922 affirmed:
“We have no doubt whatever in regard to the chronology relating to the dates of 1874, 1914, 1918, and 1925… There can be no more question about 1925 than there was about 1914.”
Armageddon Dated and Redated
The Society repeatedly predicted the timing of Armageddon:
1915 — “Battle of the great day of God Almighty” would end in 1915 (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. II, p. 101)
1925 — “No more question about 1925…”
(Watch Tower, May 15, 1922)
1941 — Children were given literature “for most effective work in the remaining months before Armageddon” (Watchtower, Sept 15, 1941)
1975 — “Firmly maintained” that Armageddon would occur by autumn 1975 (Watchtower, Aug 15, 1968, p. 494)
20th Century — “Shortly, within our twentieth century…” (The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah, 1971, p. 216)
Each prediction failed. No global tribulation. No visible return of Christ. No end of the world.
Doctrinal Reversal: The Return of Christ
The Society originally taught that Christ returned invisibly in 1874:
Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. IV, p. 621:
“Our Lord… is now present, since October 1874”
Watch Tower, March 1, 1923:
“The Lord has been present since 1874”
But after 1943, the date was changed to 1914:
You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth (1982/1989): “Christ returned and began ruling… in 1914”
Mankind’s Search for God (1990):
“Mankind has been living in the time of the end since 1914”
This doctrinal shift is not a minor adjustment—it is a complete reversal of prophetic chronology.
⚖️ Theological Consequences
“This chronology is not of man, but of God… absolutely and unqualifiedly correct.”
— Watchtower, July 15, 1922, p. 217
If the Society’s chronology was “divinely corroborated,” then its failed predictions expose it as a false prophet. Scripture is clear:
“When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass… the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously.”
— Deuteronomy 18:22
_______________________________
The Watchtower Society has repeatedly spoken presumptuously in the name of God.
🔥 Apologetic Verdict
The Watchtower Society’s failed predictions of Armageddon and the return of Christ violate the biblical standard for prophetic truth. Their shifting dates—from 1874 to 1914, from 1915 to 1975—are not divine revelations but human speculation.
“A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign…”
— Matthew 16:4
The true return of Christ will not be hidden, invisible, or confined to a date in a book. It will be unmistakable, glorious, and final.
“For as lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west…”
— Matthew 24:27
Final Plea
There are several million Jehovah’s Witnesses today—many unaware of this history. Pray for them. Share the truth. Expose the error. And hold fast to the unchanging Word of God.
“Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”
— Hebrews 13:8
“God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ…”
— Galatians 6:14
_______________________________
Full Citations: Watch Tower Publications Referenced
Rutherford, J.F. The Harp of God – The Harmony of the Ten Primary Bible Teachings. International Bible Students Association – Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Copyright 1921, published 1928.
Russell, C.T. Studies in the Scriptures – Series II: The Time is at Hand. Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Published 1889.
Russell, C.T. Studies in the Scriptures – Volume IV: The Day of Vengeance (later retitled “The Battle of Armageddon”). Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Published 1897.
The Watch Tower, May 15, 1922. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY.
The Watch Tower, March 1, 1923. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY.
The Watch Tower, July 15, 1922. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY.
The Watchtower, September 15, 1941. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY.
The Watchtower, August 15, 1968. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY.
The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Published 1971.
Prophecy. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Published 1929.
God’s Kingdom of a Thousand Years Has Approached. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, Brooklyn, NY. Published 1973.
You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. Published 1982, revised 1989.
Mankind’s Search for God. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. Published 1990.
Reasoning from the Scriptures. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania – International Bible Students Association. Published 1985, revised 1989.
______________________________________
Note: Bodyguard Christian Apologetics has a personal library of over 100 Watch Tower Bible & Tract published works. Citations are faithfully considered as to not misrepresent Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society doctrines are theological views.
#JehovahsWitnesses #WTBTS #Witnesses #Cult #Devil #DoctrineofDemons #FalseGospel #FailedProphecies #FalseProphet
4. You’re Not Sick — You’re Nutrient Deficient
🔹 Chronic fatigue, brain fog, anxiety, and even depression are often treated with prescriptions, but rarely with nutrition. Deficiency gets labeled as disease, and symptoms become life sentences.
🔹 There’s no profit in magnesium, sunlight, or clean food. So they sell pills for problems your body is trying to solve with nutrients it never received. You’re not broken —you’re depleted.
ATTENTION!
EPSTEIN FILES SITREP
What everyone is missing are the CHILDREN who were abused by EPSTEIN and OTHERS. I don’t care whether he killed himself or not.
For me, I want to believe @FBIDirectorKash & @FBIDDBongino but with the FBI’s track record with laptops (Hunter Biden, Anthony Weiner, Seth Rich, now Epstein), never mind the FBI’s previous track record for telling the truth, it is really hard to fathom that something else isn’t going on here.
I think there now needs to be an incredibly transparent briefing to the American people immediately by the DOJ.
The lack of trust in the FBI and DOJ is so thick you can cut it with a knife.
C’mon guys, the American people are not stupid or afraid to know the truth.
@AGPamBondi@realDonaldTrump@SusieWiles