@L1lL3l@PhDniX So you're saying it's perfect, but also vague, and explains everything, but also not some things? Why doesn't it explain the random letters if it explains everything in it?
@L1lL3l@PhDniX "What is being narrated in the Qur'an is no fabrication; it is rather confirmation of the Books that preceded it, and a detailed1ย exposition of everything, and a guidance and mercy for people of faith."
https://t.co/2CU8mhsCZ0
@L1lL3l@PhDniX "What is being narrated in the Qur'an is no fabrication; it is rather confirmation of the Books that preceded it, and a detailed1ย exposition of everything, and a guidance and mercy for people of faith."
https://t.co/2CU8mhsCZ0
@L1lL3l@PhDniX "What is being narrated in the Qur'an is no fabrication; it is rather confirmation of the Books that preceded it, and a detailed1ย exposition of everything, and a guidance and mercy for people of faith."
https://t.co/2CU8mhsCZ0
@L1lL3l@PhDniX "What is being narrated in the Qur'an is no fabrication; it is rather confirmation of the Books that preceded it, and a detailed1ย exposition of everything, and a guidance and mercy for people of faith."
https://t.co/2CU8mhsCZ0
@L1lL3l@PhDniX "What is being narrated in the Qur'an is no fabrication; it is rather confirmation of the Books that preceded it, and a detailed1ย exposition of everything, and a guidance and mercy for people of faith."
https://t.co/2CU8mhsCZ0
@L1lL3l@PhDniX I did... Again. Is that your strategy... To continue to say I don't provide something that even you , yourself quoted, and I keep responding with?