@Rita3349 Firstly, they do not receive taxpayer funded security, only state security when attending events or performing royal duties. Both have done alot of great things for the community and are well loved. Maybe get your facts straight before posting rubbish.
@IMoutain What you are saying is incorrect, Harry felt he was entitled to the British taxpayer to fund his security, even though he decided to leave the UK, and it was decided by the British government not Charles. They decided to leave at that time, so they should pay!
@Lincolnabe123 You do know the Tom Silvagni investigation took just under 6 months before he was charged? And from what was reported on 7 news last night, the allegations are the same?
@annettedittert A scandal? Why should the British taxpayer pay for their security? They have plenty of money to pay for it. He isn't a working royal anymore, but still wants handouts!
@KateWilton1 They have plenty of money to pay for their own. Why should the British tax payer pay for security for them? when they aren't working royals anymore.