Hello @AOC, while you smiled in a hijab at a New York event, I was in Federal Court facing the 4th hitman hired by the Islamic Republic to assassinate me, for campaigning for Iranian women to have the same freedom you performed for a photo op. Will you come to court with me in August when I face the 5th hitman? Or does solidarity only work when it doesn't offend the Islamic regime?
You wore hijab voluntarily in New York. Women are killed in Iran for taking it off.
You are the very woman who, at every opportunity, protests against violence against women, decries gender segregation, and champions "inclusion." Yet here you stand, smiling and wearing a hijab, at an event in New York, in the heart of the West, where men and women are strictly separated. To me and millions of Iranian women, this does not look like a choice. It is no longer "My body, my choice," but rather "My body for votes."
They who claim to fight for women's self-determination in the name of feminism voluntarily embrace an ideology that mandates our women cover their hair simply because they are women. They enjoy the prosperity, freedom, and privileges of the Western world, where they may live as autonomous individuals , yet they simultaneously accept that other women should not be afforded the same rights.
#LetUsTalk
There is a species of ant that approaches the edge of another colony, kills a single worker, and then takes on the dead ant’s scent.
For ants, scent is everything. Wearing that scent, the intruder walks in with no resistance. The workers pass by without concern.
The intruder moves inward, toward the queen, then It sprays the queen with a different scent that makes the workers turn on her. Then they surround her and kill her.
The intruder does not need to fight anyone. The colony does the work itself.
Once the queen is gone, the intruder reproduces. The true invader is no longer an intruder. It is the future.
This is how ideological takeover works.
A destructive foreign ideology takes the scent of familiar ideas and walks in as if it belongs.
It speaks the native vocabulary, justice, equality, compassion, rights, progress. It uses these words and quietly changes what they point to.
Then it moves inward.
It alters how foundations are perceived. Responsibility is made to smell like cruelty, law like oppression, borders like hatred, tradition like danger, history like guilt.
At that point, the civilization turns on itself.
Its courts, universities, churches, media, and bureaucracies begin treating their own foundations as threats. They believe they are defending the system.
They are enforcing what now smells legitimate. They do not see the intruder because it sounds exactly like them.
And when the founding principles are finally removed, discredited, dismantled, erased, the foreign ideology does not need to conquer anything. It inherits what is left.
The queen is gone. The colony is no longer itself.
The most effective conquest is the one that convinces a society that its own foundations are the enemy, and that killing them is an act of virtue.
This post is approaching 1 million likes
It’s just Charlie Kirk with his family
There are literally no words to describe how angry I still am. I can’t even sleep.
I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that.
This is anarchy and true chaos.
My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.
Evidence for an early date:
1. There is no mention of the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, the center of Jewish life. So the New Testament was completed before 70 AD.
2. There is no mention of Nero's persecution of Christians in 64 AD, though other persecutions are mentioned. This moves the date even earlier.
3. Paul was martyred in ca. 64 AD, but he is still alive in the book of Acts, Luke's second writing, which means it was written before 64 AD.
4. Paul quotes Luke’s Gospel and refers to it as Scripture in 1 Timothy 5:18, so that book was likewise written before 64 AD.
5. Peter refers to Paul’s letters as Scripture in 2 Peter 3:16. Peter died around A.D. 65, another reason to date Paul's writings early.
John A. T. Robinson, a radical theologian once known for his role in launching the “Death of God” movement, later changed his mind. His dating:
• Matthew: written between 40 and 60 AD
• Mark: written between 45 and 60 AD
• Luke: written between 50 and 60 AD
• John: written between 40 and 65 AD
Conclusion: The Gospels were all composed within the lifetimes of eyewitnesses and contemporaries of the events -- people who could have falsified any of the Gospels' claims.
@AandGShow I like how Dana Bash started the telecast by calling this “a watershed moment.” It was a freaking interview! Any normal Presidential candidate in her position would have done several of them by now.