Your examples still don’t establish your conclusion. White House access can be limited, but established press access cannot be denied arbitrarily or based on viewpoint.
If your argument is that other administrations did it, okay they are wrong to, now what ?
What viewpoint neutral reason justifies excluding these outlets?
@432hertz_@kaitlancollins It doesn’t make sense because you don’t want it to ,that’s a concept called willful ignorance.
What don’t you get ? Once again since you are a little slow, in basic terms so you can understand, just because I am critical of Trump does not make me a leftist.
I’m not a leftist, and you are not educated enough to have discourse because instead of attempting to understand what I am saying you have instead said 2 false things to me so far.
Remember just because I criticize Trump does not mean I am a leftist, but I will credit your ignorance to your MAGA hive mindset.
@wildthing_x69@kaitlancollins So we agree then. They “bought an exit,” meaning there was no verdict proving they lied.
You just validated my point for me. Thanks.
Me or you ? Settled lawsuit doesn’t equate to proving they were “lying”
A settlement normally ends disputed litigation without a judge or jury deciding who was right.
YouTube and Meta admitted no wrongdoing, and those cases were about account suspensions not false reporting.
CBS settled without a court finding that it lied…..