Reminder: Catalyzing Faith content is regularly posted on the YouTube channel. Subscribe and hit the bell to make sure you don't miss any new videos.
https://t.co/VzbEBsYSMl
@Rati0nalAtheist A sound understanding of science also leads some to a deeper religious conviction. And this religious conviction seems to withstand write well the interrogation applied to it.
@MrBrendanBlack I agree that grasping at easy answers is not a virtue. That's why I've rejected the false narrative that theism exists only to fill voids in knowledge. As for your accusation that I lack curiosity, my education combined with my ever-growing bookshelf suggest otherwise.
@JasonMc08352085 @danielbkof2 As for stem cell research and the like, don't confuse weighing ethical concerns over scientific utility with objecting to science itself.
@JasonMc08352085 @danielbkof2 It was Atheists who were the most vocal opponents of the Big Bang. In fact, the term "Big Bang" was intentionally derisive, coined by those who thought the model was too intrinsically theistic.
@souled_dark@Renevelation I see no misrepresentation.
But if we're talking honesty, the honest thing to do when a religious person objects to science because of theology would be to talk about whether or not there is a conflict, not default to claiming ownership of science in response.
@Thedukeistheman It looks like we largely agree. An individual atheist can enjoy science, just like an individual religious believer can. But atheists shouldn't make any generic claims about science being a value unique to atheists
@Thedukeistheman Then I'd love to have a longer conversation about that to see what specifically they found to be problematic. In general, I see no problem with people expressing the reasons for their doubts. But there is a problematic in assuming science needs to lead to atheism.