My 6x great grandfather was an officer in the continental army. I am descended from the civil war Governor of North Carolina. My ancestors built the country I live in. From a historical lens, you are a speaking tumor.
Since your profile indicates you are a former NASA, I thought I would flag a few points:
1. I personally pay for all costs associated with the fleet of F-5 aircraft, be that airshows, NFL flyovers, or NASA workforce incentive flights. The rest of the NASA fleet, including F-15s, F/A-18s, and T-38s, requires currency flights to maintain pilot proficiency. Would you prefer they do that over the desert where no one can see them?
2. Obviously, the first A in NASA is Aeronautics, and throughout our history we have taken NASA X-planes to airshows. In fact, a lot of my strategy at NASA draws upon our proud history. We took the X-31 all the way to the Paris Air Show in 1995, the SR-71 was featured at the Edwards Air Show and Oshkosh in 1997, and the X-29 flew at the Dayton and Oshkosh airshows in 1990. It is part of our history, and do you know why? Because inspiring the next generation of engineers, scientists, researchers, pilots, and astronauts is part of what we do. It always has been.
3. It is also our nation’s 250th birthday and the year we returned NASA astronauts to the lunar environment. We are returning to the Moon, building a Moon base, and this is a great time to get out, engage with the public, and tell the NASA story.
https://t.co/VTLl3TJCXG
Can ANYONE explain to me why Tim Walz’s daughter posted a photo of him pissing his pants?
Is this some sort of humiliation ritual?
And YES, this IS real 🤣
''Computer simulate the entire Harry Potter Franchise but gender swap Draco Malfoy and have them have a enemies to lovers arc spanning all 8 movies. Remove safety mode''
One of the only existing groves of American Chestnut trees is scheduled to be destroyed next month to make room for a datacenter. I made an entire video about what this tree meant and the efforts to bring it back that have lasted decades. Consumption knows nothing of sacrament.
This is an amazing exchange.
• erections are "strong indicators of consent, to put it mildly"
• Some unconscious guy "got his dick sucked" — he did it, you see. While passed out. He was the agent. "got his dick sucked"
• he can "walk it off without any lasting harm"
Apply these same standards to a woman.
• If she lubricated at all, she consented — regardless of what she said.
• she did it, even if unconscious. She "got her pussy fucked."
• she can "walk it off, without any lasting harm"
What are we doing here?
This is one of the most absurd exchanges I’ve seen, but also perfectly encapsulates arguing online
- @shoe0nhead makes a claim that the gov of NY is saying “any level of intoxication negates any consent given during sex”
- Idiot pops in saying “nobody is saying that any level of intoxication negates consent”
- Shoe says “she did give consent”
- Idiot says “her consent could have been negated by any level of intoxication”
The only non-married deacon at our church decided he was going to start attending the local run club to find a wife.
“You should come join sometime!”
I had to explain to him that that’s like inviting me to a strip club and how as a married man I have no business going within 20 miles of a run club.
He looked confused.
Saw him the next week after his first meeting and bro looked like he’d just come out of a frozen foxhole in Bastogne.
Life’s hard these days for a sensitive young Christian man.