Friends, if you haven't cancelled or paused your streaming accounts, you *need* to. WGA members can't call for a boycott without guild approval, but I'm not in the guild, so I can do whatever the fuck I want. Passive income from streaming subs, even without *new*...1
@LexiAlex The waiting game is passive strikebreaking. It's so much harder to authorize another strike if everyone is still reeling from the trauma of the last one, and that's when the bosses lock you down. People unaffiliated with the guilds should be cancelling their subs.
@MoString He has done such amazing things for Minnesota that I'm voting for him *at least as much* as I'm voting for Kamala.
I'm genuinely envious of my Minnesota siblings across the river, but I've got a fight to win in Wisconsin.
Even if you’re doing (trying) something groundbreaking I think most game concepts can be broken down into straightforward chunks that are prioritized by risk + how load-bearing they are to the experience.
Everything I worked on from F:NV to Pentiment was approached the same way.
@MarisaDoom Yes, jurors often react strongly. Especially and understandably, to traumatic images or testimony. Sometimes, they get emotional enough that the trial has to be recessed so they can compose themselves.
Today, my co-counsel Greg Adler and I filed suit against Fox, Newsmax, Univision, Timcast, Steven Crowder, Owen Shroyer, Simon Ateba, and Hollywood Unlocked for falsely portraying our innocent client as a neo-Nazi mass shooter.
NEW: Here’s a 🎁 link to my piece about lawyers vs liars, using defamation suits to make ppl like Alex Jones, Rudy Giuliani & DJT pay, apologize or both. @WillkieFarr @BankstonAtLaw https://t.co/24sV57880V
In this THREAD, I suggest that SCOTUS has a high interest in stalling in order to avoid settling the question of whether Donald Trump is an insurrectionist. Respectable people are saying the courts should stay out of 2024. SCOTUS might find a way to oblige.