@JerryGifford72@Laurieluvsmolly@DonaldJTrumpJr I’m honestly not sure he had policies. He had grievances. He had bigotries. He had sound bites. He worked tactics, not strategies. Like a dog chasing a car…with no idea what to do when he caught it. He could handle rallies but not conversations.
I’m not sure, @thisgirlcoco, if your comment regarding a medical degree was directed to me. If so, I certainly don’t have a medical degree, but have tremendous respect for those who do. My comments re virus latency are, I believe, accurate albeit elementary. My point to the original poster is that symptoms that are normally caused by a virus can occur long after an initial infection. Reactivation is unpredictable, and viruses are difficult, and often impossible, to eradicate. If that is inaccurate, I would welcome your correction.
@Dan31992378@kylenabecker Read some more. The appeals court ruled 7-4 in favor of Jack Smith. Kyle what’s-his-name didn’t understand what he was talking about. Trump got the smackdown, not Smith.
@wyo2step@kylenabecker 7 judges on an 11-judge panel upheld the lower court’s order to X Corp to release the records. 4 dissented from the majority opinion. So, that’s 7 - 4 in favor of Jack Smith. Get it?
That’s an absurd point of view. This judge plays by the rules. He enforces the same rules with any defendant, complainant, or attorney who appears in his court. Sitting at the defense table muttering insults against a witness who is testifying, loudly enough for the jury to hear, would not be tolerated in any courtroom, no matter who was the judge, or who was the defendant.
@patriotny17 @TammieMcDonal17 As I said, viruses are very difficult to predict and to treat. Some viruses, such as Chickenpox/Shingles or Herpes, or HPV, or HIV can lie dormant for years, even decades, and then they erupt and cause all kinds of problems. I wish you well.
@gtconway3d His marbles are square. That’s why his thoughts never leave himself. That’s why he can’t acquire new information. That’s why he tilts forward.
@DanySlone @jeffstorobinsky A fascinating take on a guy who had 4 years in the White House, two of them with both houses of Congress, and did virtually nothing for the America you say he fights for. He didn’t even do what he said he would do, much less what he should have done.
@jtftweets@gtconway3d@RpsAgainstTrump@judgeluttig The pro-rule-of-law people should be proponents of the people who are trying to eviscerate the rule of law? The people who follow the lead of someone who embraces 1 constitutional amendment and 26 personality disorders? Really?
House Republicans, many of them, are not oriented to making law. They are oriented to opposition. They have no legislative agenda. They have no defining principles. They only function cohesively when in the minority. They are the party of “NO”, which is crippling now that they hold the majority. Jim Jordan’s legislative history is emblematic of the problem. In 17 years in the House, he has never authored a Bill. Not one. Every one of the Bills he has “co-sponsored” (which basically requires checking a box) has failed to become law. The committees he now chairs are caught up in cultural grievance, re-litigating the 2020 election, or looking for bogeymen in the long-imagined “deep state.”
In a narrowly-divided legislature, negotiation and compromise is often necessary to make any discernible progress. In this session of the House, Republicans are threatened that any cooperation with Democrats will lead to the member being ”primaried” by his own party. The grand conundrum: If I try to do my job, I won’t be able the keep the job I’m not allowed to do. Such is the chaos in the minds of lawmakers in today’s Republican Party.