@Mrpossidez You just haven’t met them yet.
The person you want to talk to every day.
The one you don’t stare at because they’re attractive, but because being around them feels like being on something, and you never want it to wear off.
This post reminds me of Hayek's idea of spontaneous order. Markets, languages, and even laws often evolve bottom-up from individual actions rather than top-down design. Once they're in place, vested interests keep them going. Spot on.
We tend to attribute too much intent to the actions of our forebears. But human systems are rarely designed. They are more likely emergent consequences of constraints than deliberate conspiracies. And once established, they are maintained by both convenience and opportunism.
You people actually hate your partners. It manifests in how you relate and view relationship with them.
You dragged MummyZee for doing exactly this. You dragged the TikTok women who wake up early or wake from sleep to cook for their husbands who work hard to look after the family. Yet, you're cheering for this and asking for this kind of man. To what end? That you'll find a loving and kindhearted man whom you plan not to love?
I also do not understand the men who have a problem with this. I know most of you do not want your women to be successful and do not expect them to. That is the only way to manage your ego and feel like a man. You want to be the only successful one who pay all the bills so you can control her.
Love is sacrifice. Love is death to self. Love is putting your partner's interest first. Love is consideration. Love is kind.
This manifestation of unkindness exists in various forms:
- "I love my husband, but his money is our money, and my money is my money." No, you don't love him.
- "A man must always be 5 steps ahead of his wife no matter what." You're competing with your wife and will stifle her growth to protect your ego. That is not love.
- "I love my husband, but I can never do this for any man." You eliminate endearment to make him a nondescript in order to validate your lovelessness. "Any man" Meanwhile, it is your man you're referring to.
- "Gender roles exists for a reason. A man should not be cooking." You probably believe this because you've convinced yourself you must be 5 steps ahead and always pay the bills so you won't do any other thing in the house. But love is togetherness. You're not going to remove financial contributions and responsibilities because you're a woman. You're not going to remove domestic responsibility because you're a man.
From doing things for your man or the home and collecting back twice the money in accrued interest, to refusing to commit your finances to the home, to referring to acts of service as slavery, to demanding for love you never give, to refusing to make yourself useful at home, to frustrating your woman's career progress and financial growth to protect your insecurity, among other, it shows you people do not love your partners and do not understand what togetherness mean.
Yeah, it’s great hypocrisy to criticize people for doing something, and then end up doing the same thing.
Then you want people to acknowledge the nuances in your case but you never did the same for others
Think of it this way: if the fundraising goes wrong, for example, if the money isn’t properly accounted for, who will people blame? Him, or his page?
People trust him, and that’s why they’re willing to support the cause. The fundraising is happening because of his reputation and the community that believes in him.
Exactly!
Election observers are more like ceremonial witnesses than real enforcer, giving a sense of legitimacy without changing what actually happens.
It’s like a performance, the ritual matters more than the reality.
I think the concept of "election observers", with respect to Africa, is meaningless.
You can go ahead, massively rig elections, only for "election observers" to support you, or mouth meaningless platitudes.
Whatever happens, you still get away with your daylight election robbery.
Your perspective and Mr. Possidez’s perspective are both valid from a theistic point of view. Neither one is “more correct,” because each viewpoint speaks to different kinds of people.
That’s the challenge that comes with using religious or theistic frameworks to explain life and its difficulties, different people interpret them in different ways.
In both of your explanations, neither of you mentioned direct answers or explanations from the one receiving the prayers. We don’t actually know how God responds to prayers, because He doesn’t talk back.
What we have instead are interpretations, your understanding of how prayer works based on certain parts of the Bible that you choose to focus on.
I wish the view were simply controversial, but I think it's more than that. I think It’s wrong.
To be clear, it is rhetorically sophisticated, but I fear it is also rhetorically sophistic. As always, MrPossidez writes with dexterity, and his verbal profundity often outpaces the best of us at our best. So even when one disagrees with him, it's always a delight to read what he has to say.
Here, though, the brilliance of the writing masks an uncharacteristically shaky argument, one that is more eisegetic than exegetic.
The argument’s greatest strength is that it is very humane.
The argument's greatest flaw is that it is very human.
Virginity, no male friends, introverted, no tattoos, super-submissive, church-raised…
Do these things really predict long-term loyalty as well as we think? I’ve personally seen quiet, virgin, ideal good girls cheat the moment life got hard or someone gave them attention.
why do we only talk about “vetting her” and almost never about vetting ourselves? If the virgin you’ve chosen doesn’t satisfy you in bed, what would you do? If your virgin catches you cheating first, do you think she’ll continue being loyal?
if we’re going to judge her for her mom’s choices, shouldn’t we also judge a man for his dad’s choices? Or do we only apply family-background rules in one direction?
Genuine questions, bro. I’d love to hear how you think about these. Same goes for anyone reading. What do you all think actually predicts loyalty better: this checklist, or something else?
Gigolo 101!!!!
EVERY WOMAN IS A HAW till she proves and continues to prove her difference over the years!!! A woman has to consistently earn your trust.
This is why as a man, you must know the woman you’re committing to, see her as she is, not who you want her to be, and build around that. Most men are simply victims of their own choices and ignorance.
Men, here are some of the things you should look out for before being a fool who sacrifices himself for a love that doesn’t serve you
VIRGINITY
You are her first and only body. Every other woman is more susceptible to cheating because she’s done it and been successful at it. Nobody does anything once. If you got her by winning her over from other men(when she shouldn’t have even given you audience), remember better men than you exist and she would also give them access to her just as she did to you. Almost every man(aside religious men) who boasts of bagging a godly woman is hitched with a woman no other man has slept with.
GODLY VALUES
Every good woman is godly. By godly, I mean they naturally possess traits that guarantees her being good. Traits like HUMILITY, MODESTY, DILLIGENCE, PEACEFULNESS, PATIENCE, SHAME, HONESTY, TRANSPARENCY and LOYALTY. And they often possess these traits not because of religious dictates, but because it’s who they are naturally. This is why laziness, pride, materialism, greed and impatience in a woman correlate positively with cheating.
INTROVERSION
Extroversion heightens a woman’s possibility of compromising on her vows and commitment to you. The more she goes out, the more likelihood she would go to places she’s not supposed to and be in situations where she forgets herself. Women ruin other women that’s why a good woman is almost always a lone-ranger.
NO GOOD WOMAN KEEPS MALE FRIENDS. She’s learnt from her man, her father and mother that men and women are not wired to stay friends without anything bringing them together. Her mother doesn’t have male friends why is she keeping one? Na as she go school dey work na him her mama go school dey work too. So, where she learn her own?
NOT JUDGMENTAL. Every good woman is never openly judgmental, especially when she’s still young! Even the woman in the quoted video is a red-flag who is simply virtue-signaling.
Yes, begin closed doors, relatively good women get angry at the behavior of degenerate women but their godliness makes them less vituperative and openly giving bad “gist” of other women publicly. A lady pandering to men is the equivalent of a male feminist so be very wary!!!
BACKGROUND.
A lady whose mother isn’t a cheat would most likely not be a cheat herself. A woman whose mother cheated would obviously cheat too because she’s seen that life would be fun and go on either ways. This is why offsprings of some single mothers are a huge red-flag, they’ve seen that the world will not end if they’re caught cheating.
One of the interesting stuff from this video is how that she’s talking about relatively good women and telling you a good woman should be feared and could potentially ruin you. So, if all these fears exist for even a relatively good woman, I genuinely do not want you find out what a shameless HAW would do to you.
Some Nigerian haws you should never have anything to do with:
Smoking haws
Septum-piercing and multiple piercing haws
Haws covered in tattoos
Haws sexualizing themselves on the internetdotcom
Money-sexual haws
.
.
.
Men, a good woman is born, never in your little world think you can change a woman’s nature and idiosyncrasies.
The most important take away from this post is to build yourself and love yourself enough to walk away from a woman who can or has ruined your bloodline.