Maybe you're looking at vibecoding with a harsh eye?
Vibecoding can only go to the extent of who's vibecoding.
I think we both agree that a coder with vibecoding tools can make good stuff right?
I know senior devs who didn't write code for months and they deploy a lot of things. They work, they are good, and they are secure.
Without writing a single line of code.
It's just like rowers Vs. Engines.
When engines were placed on boats, rowers lost their jobs at the boat. They said the engines won't hold it. They'll break, they are not good enough.
And they did. At first.
Now look at them. Every boat has an engine and they work fine. You just need the captain and some other crew members. No rowers anymore.
A normal person would see the engine as a good thing. Efficient, fast, and helps move without laboring the rowers.
But for the rowers.
It took their job.
That's why they became defensive.
And that's why devs are so against AI. Not because they know it is not good enough, yet.
But because they feel threatened. And they saw the outcomes.
And got backed to the corner.
And you know what a rabbit does when he gets surrounded? He bites.
Sorry to step on your dreams but AI is taking over everything. Including my job as a copywriter and marketer. It's just a matter of time now, and there's nothing you can do than watch until it happens.
The onion of blame.
Everyone has this, something bad happened and you start peeling through the onion layer by layer.
1. The environment: you blame circumstances no has control over.
2. The "system" or the "industry": policies, laws, regulations, markets. Anything.
3. The tools: you start blaming the method; posting doesn't work, DMing doesn't work.
4. Others: you start blaming everyone around you except you.
5. Then you. You blame you for the mess that you made.
That's how humans progress in the blame onion.
The blame the environment, the circumstances, the resources, other, and lastly yourself.
@ProductHunt Gm. I'm Ren, launched https://t.co/mFvYE5OPN6, feedback-for-feedback queue for founders to get feedback for their tool.
Submit your tool, give feedback to earn credit and use that credit to get feedback. 560 founders joined, 211 tools submitted and 203 reviews given in a month.
@CricTalk29 Gm. I'm Ren, launched https://t.co/mFvYE5OPN6, feedback-for-feedback queue for founders to get feedback for their tool.
Submit your tool, give feedback to earn credit and use that credit to get feedback. 560 founders joined, 211 tools submitted and 203 reviews given in a month.
@buildinpublic Gm. I'm Ren, launched https://t.co/mFvYE5OPN6, feedback-for-feedback queue for founders to get feedback for their tool.
Submit your tool, give feedback to earn credit and use that credit to get feedback. 560 founders joined, 211 tools submitted and 203 reviews given in a month.