@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay To the other point. I wasn’t deflecting with the US not having a King but your argument wasn’t worded right. If that’s not what you meant then state that. But does an ancient nation require a King or ruler to be a nation? It didn’t make sense so please explain what you meant
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay So not only did Palestine exist as a nation beforehand, with its own individual people and economic status (later with help of the UK), the same Israel we know now is far off the Semitic kingdom that was there. Those same people would be disgusted at what modern Israel is
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay What makes a nation exactly, so on.
With the British Mandate and the Ottoman influence, we ended up getting Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. Or do you not recognize them as nations because you’re too busy licking Yahu’s shoes clean?
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay What the hell are you actually talking about now? Your argument has gone off the wall and literally is making no sense. The USA doesn’t have a king, does that make us a legitimate country? Instead of asking me why don’t you show me your sources to prove me wrong
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay The Babylonian Empire had a great portion of the Middle East towards the Mediterranean. Israel was completely enveloped in it.
The Jewish people then resembled Palestinians more back then as well - not the Polish-Ashkenazi Jewish people who come from Europe
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay I used the Arabic name for Palestine btw. They’re mentioned in the Bible. Check Genesis for me. If your logic is like that then we can say that the Israel we have today isn’t the same as back then, which historically is true.
Again, a google search proves you wrong
@PaxHawk1u@_ayandamay Your last point actually is kinda funny. I’m too unbothered to look that up regardless, but I don’t think they’d call it Palestine. They’d probably refer to it as it’s Arabic name which would be Filasțīne