@AriWasserman the fact that you're just talking about Alabama is telling. Texas is also ranked above FSU. And if the rankings are to be believed - if Georgia had beaten alabama - then TExas would have been the 4 not FSU.
@DawgStats I disagree, and my opinion is based on data. the playoff committee ranked texas higher than FSU, and the outcome of Alabama Georgia has no bearing on that decision. The counter opinion is based on a non-verifiable conspiracy theory, I cannot meaningfully interrogate
@AriWasserman if you look at the process the committee is given to follow, they are supposed to consider how key injuries affect the competitiveness of the teams. you're essentially asking the committee to ignore the criteria that was agreed upon by the conferences.
@AaronSuttles If there is one available spot, and one 12-1 Power 5 champion beat the other 12-1 Power 5 champion, it should get in. Thatโs why people arenโt worked up about that.
The committee said FSU was different w/o Travis, so it makes sense CFP could seed UT above FSU. But keep FSU in.
@NicoleAuerbach @wahoolaw2006 @AaronSuttles ok so then your gripe is with the PROCESS that the committee has been given. not the DECISION of the committee.
@JChrisFree@alex_kirshner they are required to give strong preference to conference champions. actually read their criteria, and the rankings make total sense.
@alex_kirshner the committee followed the criteria that was agreed upon by the conferences. they rewarded conference championships and used strength of schedule, record against common opponents, head to head, and took into account injuries to key players. it's spelled out in their guidance.