Imagine if every time you sent an email or text, a fraction of your transfer got left behind and lost during the transfer? That's what we've come to accept with #cryptocurrency. But we don't have to. Choose #Nano. Feeless transactions. Lossless and efficient. $XNO
My Tesla prevented an accident . Before my brain could process what was happening my car stopped abruptly and resumed running after the dashing boy cleared the path.I couldn’t have prevented this on my own and the aftermath is tragic and unimaginable. Thank you Elon.
JUST IN: Chainlink co-founder @SergeyNazarov speaks at the @CFTC's Inaugural Innovation Advisory Committee meeting, hosted by @ChairmanSelig
Sergey was appointed to the CFTC IAC this year to advise on how new technologies are transforming markets
After attending the White House technology leaders meeting with President Trump, Chainlink Co-Founder Sergey Nazarov will be attending the CFTC’s inaugural Innovation Advisory Committee meeting today in DC as policymakers and industry leaders discuss the new frontier of finance.
Inside that room, Trump wasn't doing a listening tour. He asked the group for actual feedback, what should the administration be doing next.
The topic was the CLARITY Act, the bill that's supposed to finally draw a clean line between what the SEC regulates and what the CFTC regulates in crypto. And @SergeyNazarov's read walking out was that Trump and his team thought getting it done was "very doable."
CLARITY needs 60 votes to clear the Senate. Republicans hold 53 seats. Even with total party unity, they're still 7 votes short. The House passed this thing back in July 2025, and it's been parked in the Senate for over a year now.
September 15 is the next real checkpoint, a procedural vote to see if it can even move forward. So when someone who was physically in that room says the path looks doable, that's not vibes. It's someone who just walked out with a specific list of which senators still need to be worked.
BlackRock, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Charles Schwab, Franklin Templeton - firms managing over $30 trillion combined, have all publicly backed this bill. When capital at that scale lines up behind a piece of legislation, it's not because they're betting on it failing.
CLARITY isn't just a compliance checkbox. It decides which agency oversees most of the crypto market long term, and that decision shapes everything downstream. Tokenized stocks, RWA products, oracle infrastructure, stablecoin rails, all of it gets built differently depending on whether it's treated as a security or a commodity.
Right now companies are building in a gray zone, which means capital sits on the sidelines and institutions hedge their bets. A clear framework changes that math. It's the difference between "maybe we launch this in the US" and "we're building here first."
And the Nazarov detail matters for a specific reason: Infrastructure players don't usually get pulled into that kind of room. Exchanges and issuers, sure, they're the ones directly regulated. But an oracle network like @chainlink sits underneath almost everything: the data feeds, the cross-chain messaging, the plumbing institutions actually rely on to trust on-chain data.
If the people building that layer are getting asked directly what the rules should look like, that's a signal about where the administration thinks the real infrastructure risk lives. It's not just at the exchange level but at the data and connectivity layer underneath it.
The bigger meaning here is about sequencing.
Normally you'd expect regulation to follow legislation. Congress passes a law, then agencies write rules to implement it. What's happening instead is the reverse. The SEC and CFTC are building the operational framework right now, this week, through rulemaking and advisory committees, while the actual law is still stuck in the Senate. By the time CLARITY gets a real vote, most of the substance may already exist in practice. The bill becomes less about creating the rules and more about making them permanent and litigation-proof.
So while everyone else writes "Trump met with crypto CEOs" as the headline, the real story is this:
The people building the infrastructure are now sitting in the room where the rules get shaped, before the vote happens.
That changes how you should read every announcement coming out of Washington for the next month. It's not about who showed up to the summit. It's about who's in the room when the actual decisions get made.
JUST IN: Sergey Nazarov speaks at the White House on tokenization's impact on the American economy
“There’s a very real and tangible outcome that’s benefiting the adoption of U.S.-issued assets and the U.S. dollar”
LINK Everything
So Trump making money from crypto is suddenly a national crisis @SenWarren ... but manipulation of stocks and oil? Totally fine.
The selective outrage is wild.
But fuck it, let's punish a an entire sector thats been patiently waiting for years for regulatory clarity all to spite Trump @TheDemocrats
👀 A Senate vote is still in play. If you want a YES, you need to be loud. Tell your Senator to pass Clarity. Your voice matters most right now. Let's do this. 👇
Connect to Congress: https://t.co/4gp0IRJmeU
📞(202) 224-3121
& don't forget to repost, tag your Senator, and tag CryptoLaw.
1/
The current CLARITY Act is insanely bullish for Chainlink. 🔥 👀 🚀
It potentially gives $LINK a statutory path to non-security treatment, explicitly protects oracle services, lets banks hold digital assets to pay network fees, and accelerates tokenized finance.
Stop whatever you’re doing.
I don’t care that it’s a Friday in the middle of summer.
If you work in crypto, take two minutes to submit a letter urging the Senate to bring the Clarity Act to the floor for a vote.
This is one of the easiest ways to make your voice heard.
https://t.co/mePQbxY9qd