Chanan Bos

Content creator @Fastned | Former @CleanTechnica journalist | Concerned about the currently unsustainable future of humanity

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

People wonder if FSD is safe on narrow European roads. Well have a look what it did when a tractor took up more than half of the road or when overtaking bicycles with fast oncoming traffic.

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@kenneth_kutan @vukisz @enhauto In the Netherlands we have seen that they only actually started taking the subscription money once it's on your car.

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@TeslaNewswire Not new, it was already there a year ago, see my geotagged image

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

"Elon arrivera jamais à faire des usines de puces."

Je vois ce take dix fois par jour. C'est l'erreur de raisonnement la plus prévisible qui existe, et elle se démonte en deux minutes.

Les sceptiques raisonnent par analogie. Jamais par premiers principes.

Leur argument complet : personne ne l'a fait en moins de 40 ans, TSMC a brûlé 165 milliards en Arizona, une fab 2nm coûte 28 milliards et prend 38 mois rien qu'à construire, Tesla a zéro expérience des semis. Donc impossible.

Tout est vrai. Et tout est non pertinent.

"Ça a toujours pris 40 ans" n'est pas une loi de la physique. C'est juste la vitesse d'une industrie ossifiée qui n'a jamais été attaquée par quelqu'un qui pense aux atomes plutôt qu'au précédent.

Alors on décompose la chaîne, du sable au chip qui calcule.

Matière première (sable, silicium, wafers) : zéro contrainte physique, juste du capital et de l'énergie. Design : Tesla le fait déjà (FSD, Dojo). Lithographie EUV : le seul vrai goulot, mais c'est un problème de chèque et de file d'attente, pas de faisabilité. Process et yield : le vrai moat. Packaging, mémoire, test : coordination et capacité, pas de physique fondamentale.

Question de premier principe sur chaque ligne : contrainte dure, ou contrainte molle ?

Réponse : un seul goulot dur. Tout le reste est mou. Capital, coordination, yield, aversion au risque. C'est-à-dire, mot pour mot, la maison d'Elon.

Et voilà le coup que tout le monde rate.

TSMC est lent parce que c'est une foundry généraliste : 305 process différents, 12 000 produits, 500 clients. Chaque variante détruit le yield.

Terafab fait l'inverse exact. Une fab, un seul design de puce. Le problème combinatoire qui rend le yield infernal s'effondre. Ce n'est pas TSMC qu'il reconstruit, c'est In-N-Out face à un restaurant de 300 plats.

Ajoutez l'IA. La courbe de yield, ce truc qui prenait des années d'essais empiriques, c'est un problème d'optimisation et de détection de défauts. Exactement ce que l'IA compresse. Et qui a la flotte de GPU pour le faire ? Le mec qui construit la fab justement pour nourrir son IA. La boucle se referme sur elle-même.

Et le edge personnel, ce n'est pas du folklore.

SpaceX lui a appris à intégrer verticalement la supply chain la plus "impossible" qui existe et à diviser les coûts par 10. Tesla lui a appris le scaling manufacturing. Personne d'autre sur Terre n'a les deux cicatrices en même temps.

"Aucune expérience des semis." Il n'avait aucune expérience des fusées en 2002, aucune de l'auto en 2008. Le pattern est toujours identique : il entre dans une industrie mature qui le prend de haut, il la décompose, il intègre, il gagne.

"Qui va licencier l'IP de process ?" Intel a rejoint Terafab avec son node 18A. Le moat de 40 ans, il l'achète en un partenariat.

"Trop de capital." 55 milliards en phase 1, jusqu'à 119 au total. Et la demande est captive (Tesla, SpaceX, xAI), pas un pari spéculatif externe.

"Ses timelines slippent." Oui. C'est la seule concession honnête. Mais c'est un argument sur le quand, jamais sur le si. SpaceX était en retard. Tesla aussi. Les deux ont gagné. En retard n'a jamais voulu dire échec chez lui.

Décompose la chaîne : pas une seule impossibilité physique. Que du capital, de la coordination et du yield.

Les PNJ raisonnent par précédent. Le précédent vient de se faire annuler par premiers principes.

Comme d'hab.

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@lmrj07 @AmazonMGMStudio Don't day stuff like that, you just got everyone @AmazonMGMStudio excited, that sort of treatment seems to be their wet dream.

[Every Stargate Frame In Order ᐰ @EverySG1Frame]

-buy a studio that has a popular IP
-IP has a built in base of millions of loyal fans
-false start reboots and rumor's for 10+ years
-hire an OG writer to finally reboot series
-make announcement, 90% of fan base is hyped
-we're super serious this time
-have a 3 month writers room come up with the story
-go into pre production hiring top industry vets
-release more info hyping up the fans
-cancel project 6 months later
-profit?

These are the people in charge of what we love.

I am done with @PrimeVideo and @AmazonMGMStudio

I will not be supporting any other reboot, if the OG writers can't bring their vision to the screen I have no interest in watching someone with no connection to Stargate fumble their way into making a series with "broad appeal"

[Nina Infinity @Nina7Infinity]

Hey Stargate Fans please let @amazon and @AmazonMGMStudio know how you feel about them cancelling #Stargate

They MOCK us. They think they don't need us. Let them know what you think of that.

I won't be watching ANY other Stargate that is created without the OG creators /Gero being involved.

I'm DONE with studios SHITTING ON THE FANS AND KILLING IPS WE LOVE.

#stargate #stargatecanceled #amazon #amazonstudios #amazonmgmstudio

[Michael Shanks @MichaelShanks]

I’m gonna simply say this: if you are at all interested in a Stargate show with ANY of the original creators/performers involved, now is the time to say something. Otherwise it really will be the end of that chapter forever. Let them know you are THERE

[Joseph Mallozzi 🏴‍☠️ @BaronDestructo]

Sadly, it's true. Amazon has elected not to move forward with the new Stargate series.

There's not much I can add beyond confirming what's happened. But I will say this...

Creator Martin Gero developed a new Stargate series over two years, ultimately crafting a show that offered a fresh jumping-on point for new viewers while deeply respecting existing canon. It was a series that avoided the pitfalls of several modern remakes and reboots by fully embracing the core of its predecessors: action, adventure, exploration, wonder, heart, humor, and found family. And based on that creative vision, the new Stargate series was greenlit in November of 2025.

As of today, officially, that original vision is no more. We'll never get the opportunity to introduce you to that world and those characters - or reintroduce you to, and check in with, some familiar faces from the past.

My heart breaks. For the incredibly talented writers who worked tirelessly to bring this show to life. For Martin who maintained an unwavering positive outlook throughout despite the challenges, and who always strove to make a show that would honor the fans while welcoming a new audiences. And for the long-suffering Stargate fandom who waited so long and came so close to getting a show they truly would have loved.

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@AI_EmeraldApple As sad as I am about the series being canceled, it's better than creating "diverse" slop. Seriously appreciate them wanting to stay true to the lore and the fanbase.

[Emerald Apple @AI_EmeraldApple]

Amazon cancelled the new Stargate show.

The rumor is that the show writer, Martin Gero, would not budge on compromising lore or elements within the show for a "wider modern audience" as they did with Rings of Power for LoTR lore.

Martin Gero wanted to create a show that maintained continuity in the story and lore of the old shows, including the mythology and tech, while respecting the 17 seasons of history.

Amazon instead wanted something new for the "modern audience" that's more accessible, reimagined, with more modern casual sensibilities.

Because the showrunners wanted to maintain integrity rather than turn Stargate into another "modern audience slop" like Rings of Power, Amazon leadership canceled it. The franchise heavyweight, like Joseph Mallozzi, was very excited for the fresh stories Gero worked on. Amazon says they are still open to Stargate, just not "this" version... yes they wanted to Rings of Powerify Stargate.

We really can't hate these people enough.

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@morganlinton @JayCorniea How much time would you say this took you?

[Matthew Prince 🌥 @eastdakota]

Welp, that happened faster than I predicted. Thought it would be end of 2027, then early 2027, but agentic traffic growing so fast that bots have now passed human traffic online for the first time in the Internet's history. https://t.co/2zX5bHdhsa

[Tesla @Tesla]

"My car also has FSD"

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@mikegapinski @matze19999 Would love to know as well!

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@ICannot_Enough @niccruzpatane How interesting, never even thought of that possibility. @grok is that possible? I've seen videos with lots of Waymo's in line one after another and they were fine.

[Olivia Moore @omooretweets]

Self-driving cars are fun because you never see competing SaaS products having a literal standoff in the street

[Nic Cruz Patane @niccruzpatane]

Between this Waymo and Zoox, there’s a total of 80 main sensors.

• 13 Lidar Sensors
• 51 Cameras
• 16 Radars

The self-driving problem is not a sensor problem, it’s an AI problem.

[NL FSD Inside @TSLA_inside_]

I genuinely wonder when Tesla owners in the Netherlands 🇳🇱 will get Grok integration.

We are already dealing with a very strict DMS system while using FSD. Looking at the screen too long triggers warnings, yet we still have to manually enter navigation every single time.

Grok inside Tesla could make driving smarter, safer, and far more seamless.

@elonmusk when are we getting Grok in Tesla vehicles in the Netherlands?

[Ashok Elluswamy @aelluswamy]

Soon it’ll be driving itself in to Austin city, reporting for duty!

[Chanan Bos @ChananBos]

@wholemars That's a Rivian with a Tesla logo on it 😂