@cmakemesay@nypost Who said he was a "normal man"? If you see this as anything but art for someone who clearly lived and breathed art in all forms, you likely have a perverted sense of reality.
@EW To clarify, I've always believed in MJ's innocence & didn't know of this story until I saw a recent interview with him where he appeared visibly unsettled. I couldn't tell if it was out naivety & guilt or if it was bc he was not being honest.
@EW The one thing that doesn't sit right with me - the magazine story with Frank & Vinny. I'd love someone to explain an alternate theory of this to me bc it's honestly a bad. Vinny appears very convincing & I'm not sure what he would have to benefit for lying.
@Smitherhands And yes, I understand even if the story was legit & MJ circling those things in that magazine is not a crime or proof of his guilt but it would be unsettling at the least knowing he could have been interested in anything like that on his own no less sharing it with Frank.
@Smitherhands One thing that doesn't sit right with me is the magazine story with Frank & Vinny. I'd love someone to explain an alternate theory of this to me because honestly it's a bad look especially since Vinny appears very convincing & I'm not sure what he would have to benefit for lying.
@Smitherhands I didn't know of this story until I saw a recent interview with him where he appeared visibly unsettled. I couldn't tell if it was out naivety / guilt or if it was bc he was not being honest.
@MJDoggoneLover Honestly, the only people who will watch it ARE either MJ fans or people obsessed with dragging him through the mud. Most casuals won't bother and if they do, they will probably fall asleep after the first episode.
@andjustice4some Honestly, I think only 2 types of people will watch that Notflix doc - MJ fans ready to debunk it or people who are already obsessed with smearing him. It's not going to change many minds and it's most certainly not making 900M at any box office.