God's Favorite retard.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Miguel120143954 @Arcanic7 Because that was a lie to save herself. and to lose a murder charge. none of what she said was the truth. because someone says they’re telling the truth does not mean they’re telling the truth. we know the truth because of the first clip.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Miguel120143954 That is what we call a lie, my friend.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Miguel120143954 Sun*

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Miguel120143954 Very simple my friend. what you said never happened. The sun comes home after originally staying with another friend. Goes to his room here something comes down with a rifle. and the first scene explains everything.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Feeling_fox @DonHenzzy_ Obviously, she was lying.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Miguel120143954 This has to be bait there’s no way you’re actually this retarded.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@the_j_hacks @akafaceUS There we go , just describe a hypocrite once again, Democrats did not agree with the trial and it white supremacy when he won. Once again , when you're beliefs change because of the party That makes you a hypocrite. The same with republicans.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@GMeluch64511 @venom1s Please explain your retarded logic?

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@the_j_hacks @akafaceUS Congratulations, you literally just described a hypocrite Believing in something one way And changing it when it applies to gear side , that is what a hypocrite is , that is exactly what you described. Where did I say they had to play by their old logic, I never once said that?

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@the_j_hacks @akafaceUS Because as you pointed out , their logic changed when it changed sides.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@the_j_hacks @akafaceUS You answered your question In your statement.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@MTiktok16824 @akafaceUS Do you mean the state he lived in?

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS You keep saying the exact same word without explaining. Also , if no one attacked him , nobody would have been hurt or killed. Making them causation of the exact problem.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS What was this incident of vigilantism Do you have some sort of videos of kyle was going around Looking for people to commit crimes?

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS I'm not sure if we're talking about the same person. For Kyle did live in the state And never committed any vigilantism. Yes, a life was lost because of him being there and them attacking him Both are responsible.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS But it's not. Please tell me your joking and I do not have to get out of dictionary.

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS That's not what he did. He went there to protect property once again Different argument of morals. He was from the town his father lived there. So You're Adding a few extra details that did not happen. Why is that?

[God's Favorite retard. @Chansebrown2]

@Robbyb1986 @akafaceUS Absolutely, defending property is not vigilantism though.