I promise, I'll get caught up on how angry to be about the lottery reforms after I'm done paying attention to the playoff game that's supposed to be the point of it all
@JustEsBaraheni Think it’s acknowledging that the worst teams in the league are intentionally artificially bad coming into a season. It will greatly raise the floor of the worst teams in the league and you just won’t have teams as bad as the Wizards and Nets.
@JustEsBaraheni@MoeSquare Sorry I mean incentivize winning for the worst teams. Like having to play into the lottery for example so no one comes into the season intentionally awful and makes themselves artificially worse by tanking.
@JustEsBaraheni@MoeSquare I think teams will completely float off into the abyss of nothing if there are literally zero stakes for like 50 games lol. (Also teams might tank out of the playoffs for a chance at a high pick)
@JustEsBaraheni@MoeSquare Makes games entirely meaningless for bad teams though. Incentivizing losing is more intriguing than making games have literally zero stakes honestly. You need to incentivize winning.
@AaronQuinn716@ErikJTurner They also scored 10 points the first 2 and a half quarters forcing them into an unfavourable game script and didn’t attempt a play beyond first down yardage in a score and win the game scenario.
@MoeSquare@Cam_Oflage Ngl given the light guarantees in year 5 stretching him after the season if his back is not looking good should be at least somewhat considered before lighting more draft capital on fire.
@GregTompsett While this is fair I think it’s asking the wrong question at the end of the day to be honest. At some point (think we are at that point) you can’t let the fear of hiring someone worse get in the way of the distinct possibility you hire someone better.