Ohhh gosh!
Your name defines you β it is your identity
Your identity as a whole might not be able to define you
Basic knowledge should have stripped you off this disgrace
And my father didn't leave his African name
That I didn't use it for X
Doesn't mean it isn't there .
Our names carry a slavery trait
It doesn't validate
@CFC_Izu@adaora_crypto I never talked about "bewitchment"
Ever heard of the saying....
My names don't define me?
Please..... Think before you type
I wouldn't ask if you were stupid
Cause you clearly are
So...
How stupid are you?
*Well...
What do I expect arguing with someone that sends a clip to a chatbot.
I have also stated here that
Our understanding to a fundamental truth or good only makes it subjective.
Just like phhsics
There are derived quantities and fundamental quantities
Those fundamental quantities can't be further broken but at least they can be measured and identified
Same occurs in human morality
There are some fundamental basics that can't be further deepened.
For instance
Murder is bad
Why is it bad?
Because it hurts us
Why does hurting us makes it bad?
Because we wouldn't want to do that
What if we deliberately wanted it?
Well, others wouldn't and it doesn't bring about development
Ok, if murder brings about development would it be right?
No it won't!
And so on...
You can't break down how murder is good based on philosophical ends
Because it is one of the fundamentals.
You can only give existing reasons on why it should be bad and not good.
Now, at the same time you can't say that murder is good.
Didn't come exactly to prove to you that murder is objectively good.
Because it is a fundaments and unlike you I have had this discussion months before now with lots of people, teachers, bots
So I'm not doing it for the first time.
Instead I gave you reasons on why murder should be bad based on human understanding and assertions.
And also came to tell you that murder isn't objectively good also as you claim.
Now the question is still
What moral grounds makes God killing/murder to be good as you said.
And getting your morality from a particular source only makes morality a call for obedience, arbitrariness - cause if God told you to murder then from your judgement murder should be right?
Danke!!!*
You have contradicted yourself
Thousands of times
My words remain whole and same
If you can't read before replying
Then stop replying
Also do well to send to your chatbot again
@Unknown_hmmmmm@KeyzNeyo7605@Reformed_TIMMY God is the source of good
Is another useless and baseless claim!
What objective moral facts holds him good ?
The "pope" is an epitome of goodness
Not the source
So the analogy fits right in
1. You didn't say how they deserved it. You just said that God killed them
Was it deserved? Learn to answer questions
2 and 3. Don't exist independently.
Don't know how much times I am going to say it
God the source of morality would tell you to murder
And
Murder should be right/good ?
βIf murder is wrong" is an objective moral principle, why does God's status as God exempt Him from the principle?
And if morality is simply whatever God is permitted to do, then you haven't shown that God is morally good
You've simply defined God's actions as good.β
@CharlesSteph333@KeyzNeyo7605@Reformed_TIMMY That's a stupid comparison lmao.
The boss and his employees are all human beings.
God isn't a human being and whatever standards apply to the humans he created don't apply to him lmao.
The children are chilling in heaven full of joy and glee and he's not the one that killed them
@Unknown_hmmmmm@KeyzNeyo7605@Reformed_TIMMY You just stated what he did
That he taking a life he gave in the first place isn't murder
I ask
What judgement holds that
You still don't understand the question
@Unknown_hmmmmm Have you interviewed every being on earth to ascertain that if you kill over a bet, you won't be fined?
It's not posed as a proof
But an approach to it