@BrettLeighton3@TarnUpdatez Or it’s the fact it’s completely unrealistic and a completely stupid thing to say to fans before we’ve even signed a player. The aim is always promotion, you don’t him to spell it out. It won’t cost them more money as we’ll make more money.
@Barnsleyfcpolls@antclare78 Don’t mind it, great lad, great goal scorer. But isn’t worth anything more than 4k a week with his age, not to mention he was out for the last 3/4 games with an injury. Eventually he’s gonna get one he can’t come back from, I’d rather we didn’t have him signed on 6k when it does
@olib__03@COYRCOYRCOYR@ViperZBehindYou He was on 6k last year assume we’ll have offered about 5k so if you’re offering 6 or more you can have him. He’s a great player but is only getting older, missed last 5 games with injuries. Eventually he’ll get one he can’t shake and I’d rather we don’t gamble on that
@LewisT_Williams@Davidjacksonz He’s got a lot of deserved criticism but lots of undeserved. Not sure what your wingers are like but he pings balls out to cleary on the left like there’s no tomorrow. He’s been put next to so many different midfielders this season it’s impossible to get any momentum going
@LewisT_Williams@Davidjacksonz He’ll be unbelievable in the right team. Was the best midfielder in the league under duff. Had an illness that kept him out the squad for 6 months the following season and never got going since. He needs to be a lone midfielder with a good defence behind him, with that he’s great
@BFCbennett@AdamWatsonv3mz Yeah but you can’t watch every striker. Or even watch every strikers shots at your club. It tells you something different than just watching them play
@BFCbennett@AdamWatsonv3mz That’s just completely irrelevant to xG, xG doesn’t tell you how good your team is it tell you how clinical you. It’s a really valuable stat for assessing your attacking players output. When you understand it unlike neerav who said on radio about Watters 🤦♂️
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever You asked and I told you, exposing vulnerable young adults to possible online abuse and hate is classed as a safeguarding issue. Don’t worry no one needs this specific incident to make Farage look bad, there are plenty of other things that do just that.
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever A really quick google search will tell you it absolutely is a safeguarding risk. Taking photos of vulnerable adults without their consent is a safeguarding risk.
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever She is involved with the place, she knows them and the people that work there, she will communicate with them and only photograph those who can and want to be. Whilst it’s not illegal it’s absolutely morally incorrect especially when they would know the place it is and had signs
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever A safeguarding risk is anything that puts someone at risk of something negative happening, that can include online risks. It’s not the act of taking the photo that poses a safeguarding risk it’s the possibility of posting it online and opening vulnerable adults up to abuse online
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever Young adults with safeguarding as a priority. Signs on the walls saying don’t photograph as they have learning difficulties and probably get spooked easily. You can’t just walk in with a camera crew you have no idea who’s in their and what taking pictures of them could do
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever Not the ones that can’t? If you take a photo of a class and take out the ones who can’t be photographed, that doesn’t mean I could go and take a photo of all of them and post it online. Obviously the ones she posts don’t have those who could be put in danger
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever It absolutely is, we used to have some in primary school that weren’t allowed to be posted on the school twitter account as they were put into foster due to abusive parents. It can absolutely put them in danger, you never know who might be in a photo or video you take
@SyndiTypo@LeeAndersonMP_@petuniasforever A simple explanation would be that the ones she posts online are the ones who want to be posted online. I’m pretty sure she hasn’t taken pictures of every single person associated with the cafe and posted them online