Charlie Grady

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@TinyElvisx Riddle me this. If phone data places John O'Keefe in the Albert home, how do his killers transport John and his phone out to the flagpole and no steps are recorded? Also, why not place John on the street? If this is a frame job for a pedestrian strike, why 10 feet from the berm?

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@TinyElvisx Ian Whiffin stated that John's IPhone shifts to a westerly direction at 12:31:56. Check out Robert Alessi's cross-that is when HE claims John entered Fairview. No movement recorded for John @ 12:25. Karen Read drives in reverse at 12:32-as Read said: The data is what the data is.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@TheEmilySee 1.Greg Connor 2. Jim Barakat 3. Djuna Perkins-the rest, do not have what it takes or they gave answers that do not actually address the issues. Deitch gave such neutral answers that there is no way to know what he actually believes.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX I've already explained this a number of times. Thank you for this civilized discussion. Appreciate it. I'll circle back to you come trial.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX This is speculation, not evidence. It all comes down to Karen Read's credibility with this kind of speculation. If the jury doesn't believe Read is credible, they will dismiss a few butt dials, and an intoxicated man forgetting exactly where he parked his vehicle.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX The only other witness being sued for defamation is Aidan Kearney, so it would be critical for him to also not be caught in a lie when on the stand at the wrongful death trial.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Other important factor with the defamation suit, is that if Karen Read is caught lying on the stand at this trial, it will be detrimental to her defamation case, which will follow the wrongful death trial. Read has to be careful what she says, under oath. Very,very,very careful!

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX There's no dirty plan. Just evidence, witnesses and trials. This is the most honest this process has ever been. And the honest truth is that Karen Read killed John O'Keefe. Probably on purpose. Maybe by accident. That's the hard cold truth of the matter.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@Quinnyofhearts @BrotherCounsel @DoctorTurtleboy There is no one else subpoenaed for deposition, who has gone on line and flagrantly ridiculed the legal process. You do understand that @TurtleboyDaily announced his violation of a court order on his podcast. For everyone to hear. @TurtleboyDaily is felony stupid.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Technically yes, they are separate, but in proving Karen Read DEFAMED WItnesses, this also hurts her credibility in the wrongful death suit. Much of the same evidence applies. See the connection now?

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Not sure your figures track. I feel confident he'll win. The only question is how much.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Are they?

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX There's no question but that this will go to trial. Should be soon, actually. This year.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX It all speaks to Karen Read's credibility.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Won't bankrupt him. He's going to win.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Karen Read's acquittal is now under new scrutiny from the defamation suit filed against Read & TB. That acquittal was not achieved by good lawyering & hard evidence. It was achieved by lies & media interference. The "win" isn't sturdy. It's a straw hut waiting to be blown down.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX This hinges a lot on Karen Read's credibility. Also a factor is digital forensics devastating to Read. As well as the total debunking of all Read's original allegations. There will be more latitude for Plaintiffs to challenge experts this trial, than there was at criminal trial.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@raccoongirlOF @mrsprimitive @BrotherCounsel @DoctorTurtleboy That tracks! I haven't read the letter, but I believe you.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX For Dateline, Karen Read was explicit about which door John walked into-including stating that she saw him cross the threshold. It is only in later interviews that she changes this. See the problem? If Karen is not found credible in cross, doesn't matter what she says about Jen.

[Charlie Grady @CharlieGrady6]

@HarryTadudor @TheChauffeurX Karen Read is the seminal witness to her claims. For the jury to accept testimony of her experts they must first find Read credible. Read offered stories that might have withstood scrutiny 1st trial, but cannot hold up under evidence presented 2nd trial. She is easily impeached.