🚨 Manchester United intend to relieve Michael Carrick of duties. #MUFC say no final decision & nothing set in stone but work undertaken on replacements + multiple sources anticipate change before Liverpool. W/ @lauriewhitwell@AdamCrafton_@TheAthleticFC https://t.co/E1W3QbGYx1
Sticking with Carrick while you try and entice Eddie Howe when there's Conte and Nagelsmann available is like dating Pat Butcher while you've got your eye on Kat Slater but Margot Robbie is winking at you at the bar
Club have briefed no Nagelsmann and Conte.....Carrick still in a job. Eddie Howe favourite IF they sack him. I said appointing Carrick was a mistake and the summer window was a disaster. I'll tell you this. This is sabotage. They're sinking us on purpose. RIP The United we knew
Sources have told ESPN that the handling of the job cuts did not sit well with the Glazers, particularly Joel and Avram.
One source said Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s implementation of the programme jarred with Joel’s "sense of decency and old-fashioned values." [@MarkOgden_]
🚨 OFFICIAL: Pro Ref confirm “an error of judgement” in Haaland’s goal — also informing Man United directly.
“Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position.
“In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.
“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”