@shiv_cybersurg If I remember correctly, there were 2 ejection seats missing from the Martin Baker Data ejection counter as well. Can't find the tweet now
The defence and strategic community here may disagree on many things, but the end goal has always been the same. A stronger, united, self sufficient and unapologetic India.
At a time when these kinds of BS narratives are finding organised political space, perhaps it is time for like minded people to come together, move beyond mere online discussions, and build something real for the nation? Not just lip service and procrastination but actually do something for this beautiful country.
@alpha_defense@Defencematrix1@Firezstarter1@FinestYew
VIDEO | Delhi: Investigative journalist Saurav Das, who is serving as chief spokesperson of Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) addressing a press conference says, "Abhijeet Dipke will land in Delhi on June 6 morning at 8 AM. He has called upon his supporters to come to the airport and receive him, and all of them, along with Wangchuk ji, to come to Parliament Street with him and seek permission for a protest at Jantar Mantar. We invite everyone from all political parties to be part of the protest."
#Delhi
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
@IXGguy A political party for patriots which goes beyond the votebank politics. A party with scientific and technical acumen which wants India to succeed at any cost.
We have got dumb and dumber journalists in India. The good ones probably don't have the kind of access that Baba Banarasi Das types have.
Additionally, the forces and the government may be controlling the extent and types of questions as well.
I had to go back and listen to Group Captain Amit Gehani again to understand what he meant when he referred to the J-10 and J-35.
What is needed is a follow-up question from the media: โDo you consider Chinese stealth aircraft to be genuinely stealthy? If not, could you elaborate on why?โ
Without that context, the original question and answer dosent leave too much room for interpretation. This is where mainstream media often misses the opportunity..
@SaifCS24 I would advise you to read about IACCS and how it operates.
Rest is just rhetoric. PAF was nowhere to be seen after day 1. Proof has been released by IAF multiple times now. If required, I can post it for your convenience.
1. No PL-17 for the internal bay. Without internal bay carriage, the A/c will be trackable at greater range.
2. Onboard radar will not provide guidance updates beyond certain distance.
3. AWACS to guide that missiles will have to get close to 200 km of the IB/LOC and fly continuously within that range to provide midcourse updates and risk being targetted by S400.
4. In absence of the above mechanism, ideally there would be no permanent altering of launch lines from either side.
5. Numbers they procure will define their usefulness. In lesser numbers, IAF should be able to counter with the existing lineup. Looking forward to where the next battery of s400 goes.
6. We saw runway interdiction being brought back by the IAF during the last ops. With limited depth, that will be an issue for the PAF forever. Chances are that next time, the skirmish may start off with that.
#PAF 2030 "No Defence in Depth" Push-Back Strategy: #PL17 envelope, anchored on #J35A holding line west of border + silent kill web, pushes back IAF #BrahMos/#ScalpEG launch line by ~220 km โ exposing AEW&C, tankers & strikers to far higher risk.
@hfrawat A plausible scenario. But the issue is 200/300 km along the border inside Pakistan is inside the S400 range. Can't launch it from low because the range will become 1/3. It will be tricky.