My name is Ella, I'm 17 years old.
I do long jump. I play volleyball. I go to school in New Richmond, Wisconsin.
When my school allowed a biological male into the girls' restroom without telling parents —
I went to the school board.
With my name attached.
In my own town.
I got bullied for it. Harassed online. Even some of my own teachers came after me.
I'm still here.
Because here's what I know:
The net in women's volleyball is set nearly a foot lower for a reason.
A biological male can hit a ball across that net at force that could seriously injure a girl.
And in track — all it takes is three biological males entering the girls' category
and not a single girl in this state stands on a podium.
I didn't speak up because it was easy.
I spoke up because somebody had to.
The Supreme Court is about to answer the question every girl in America is asking.
We're ready.
@JenniferSey@xx_xyathletics
All these coverings are evil and all about control. Also fairly new in our world…and this burqa bullshit is the worst one of them all. Dehumanizing and that’s the least of it…
Surreal headline, amazing that this even needed to be done.
This was never a left vs right issue but a battle for common sense. And common sense won.
One of my proudest moments in politics was intervening to stop this rubbish.
Thank you @ForWomenScot for leading the way.
NEW: While the whole world is focused is on who will be our next Prime Minister, it’s quietly confirmed that the NHS-backed Pathways puberty blocker trial has bee reapproved, with some small changes. A minimum age of entry of 11 for girls and 12 for boys…
https://t.co/YXd4FrpplH
Ed Davey has written to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson demanding she WITHDRAW official EHRC guidance protecting female-only spaces in toilets and changing rooms.
Let that land.
The Equalities and Human Rights Commission — a statutory body — has produced legally grounded guidance telling employers and public bodies that biological men should not access women’s single-sex spaces.
This is not opinion.
This is not politics.
This is the settled legal position following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on the meaning of “woman” under the Equality Act.
And Ed Davey wants it gone.
His stated reason?
The guidance is not “compatible with long-standing British values.”
British values.
He used those words to argue AGAINST protecting women’s single-sex spaces.
The same Liberal Democrats who lecture the country about tolerance, inclusion and human rights are now lobbying a Labour minister to tear up statutory guidance that protects every woman in Britain who walks into a changing room, a refuge or a hospital ward.
This is not a fringe position within the Lib Dems.
Their leader wrote the letter.
The party has chosen its side.
It is not the side of women.
Repost if you think women’s single-sex spaces should be protected.
📣 @FayeRCTribunal who has won her case against NHS England!
Congratulations to Naomi Cunningham and Liz McGlone representing 👏👏👏
Tribunal finds the policy of permitting "trans women" to use female facilities was harassment in relation to sex & GC belief and its trans equality proceedure was harassment in relation to GC belief.
“What kind of a depraved monster slices off a woman’s breast while she is being gang raped, and throws it into the dust to be used as a plaything? What kind of a twisted pervert turns rape into necrophilia by shooting a woman in the head while he is still defiling her?
What kind of ‘freedom fighters’ go into battle with a set of handy Arabic-to-Hebrew phrases, including ‘take off your pants’, ‘lie down’, and ‘spread your legs’?
What self-respecting human being presses nails, scalpels, a hammer, an axe, screwdrivers and other household tools into a woman’s genitals?
How hard do you have to rape someone, and with what, to shatter their pelvis? Who shoots a young girl in the face and then films her mutilated corpse on her brother’s mobile phone?
The answer is: Hamas terrorists. This is the stark reality of what they did to men, women and children on October 7, 2023. And the world must never forget.”
@WestminsterWAG
This is the single most shocking testimony I have ever seen.
Even more shocking is that so many people that I (& probably you) know decided on that day that the people behind this perversion deserved their active public support.
It is hard to have any faith in humanity when we see how easily large groups of people can be manipulated into supporting activities too cruel and disgusting even for the devil.
And not because they understand it, but simply because they see that as the fashionable position to take.
Stop now with any excuses. Understand that this is the real result of anti-Semitic rhetoric and behaviour online, in our political parties, and in the streets knocking on doors.
Jews are being stabbed in the streets of the UK.
We are not in Israel. We are not in Gaza. We are not at war. This is terror waged against British citizens because they are Jewish.
My very best hopes that these two Jewish people survive this entirely predictable attack.
Jewish people in our country are under constant attack.
This is no longer a growing pattern. There is an epidemic of violence against Jewish people.
It is now a national emergency and needs to be treated as such by the Government and public authorities.
I’m not Jewish & this scares the hell out of me.
The government & police have enabled the rise of antisemitism & despite their hollow words, don’t seem bothered.
First they come for the Jews.
Remember?
A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed.
*ahem*
• “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict”
No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument.
Gender identity = a manmade concept.
Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable.
• “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women”
No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men.
• “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.”
Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you.
• “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business”
Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”.
• “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.”
Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women!
• “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.”
No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with.
It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.
This Puberty Blocker Trial is the most obnoxious & destructive thing I have heard of in my 77 years on this earth and it must be stopped. Children are going to suffer unheard of harm from this trial and it must be voted out of existence.