@notchrisvolpe Nah it’s because federal law/regulation won’t allow them to use $$ from the airport fees for the rail capex unless it primarily serves airport — which I believe right now means it can’t have more than like one external stop. It’s incredibly dumb but not about the ticket revenue.
@BarbarianCap It’s a result of some odd feature of federal law that allows airport fees to pay for intraairport transit with exactly (1) external stop. So NYC could basically do this for free with Port Authority money. But it couldn’t extend the subway with the same $. So we have this
@austinahlman I personally subscribe to the woke agenda, but I actually think this is a pretty sophisticated argument that meaningfully engages with the topic from morally sound premises and I love that
@ModeledBehavior@ss492 (B) we already know there IS a market failure because the city spends $80M annually subsidising private grocery stores to operate in under served parts of the city!
@ModeledBehavior@ss492 (A) there is! Government run groceries are used all over the world to enable access to necessities at fair prices where there is a market failure (see eg Curitiba; belo Horizonte for two cities doing that); and
@ModeledBehavior I mean isn’t the limiting principle “basic human necessities”? Like I think it’s pretty easy to distinguish grocery stores from like a Yankee Candle store.
@_night_brain__ Because there are tons of examples of it working really well to expand access to nutritional foods! See, eg, ABC stalls in Belo Horizonte and Sacalao da Familia in Curitiba. It’s actually maybe his best idea!
@PEWilliams_ Perhaps depending on how it’s written. Or they should really just try to get the agency to agree to change (eg surrender some screen time in a swap for hey we get the bottom 12 inches all the time). Bc right now it’s incredibly frustrating
@PEWilliams_@MTA@NYCTSubway I believe I read the advertising agency actually installed/owns/operates the software and hardware, and in return for the platform space MTA gets to put up its info for a % of display time. But not having times on bottom 100% is probably just bad contracting.
A question I'd ask the American political elite is how many students and professors are you willing to beat into a pulp in order to shield Israel from perfectly legitimate criticism based on widely shared principles?