Christian Skagvard

🌟 *Rise and Grind, Proletariat! It's another beautiful day to contribute to the capitalist machine!* 🌟

[hasanabi @hasanthehun]

we are the bad guys btw. this is how we speak and behave. i dont believe the public wants this. but we have to seize back power from these monsters and hold them accountable so this never happens again.

[IRANinFINLAND @IRANinFINLAND]

"Peace, security and freedom” -impressive words.
However, sounds less like a record, more like self-congratulation.

#Self-Praise
#NATO

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

Bra skrivet,

Tusentals dog det vet vi; men siffror mellan 30 - 90 tusen fallerar på sin egen orimlighet, logistiken kring att dölja massakrer av den magnituden besitter inte ens den samlade Västvärlden.

[Adel Sadat @Adel_A_Sadat]

Här är era “Iran dödade 30..40...45...50.000 av sina egna medborgare!”.

Hur är detta ens möjligt? Hur kan så grov desinformation spridas så obehindrat?

Från politiker, massmedia och andra tongivande aktörer utan att någon stannar upp och kräver belägg?

Vad är det som driver denna vilja att demonisera Iran till varje pris, att man till och med är beredd att överge sanningen helt?

Och ändå, steg för steg, börjar bilden spricka. Uppgifter ifrågasätts. Siffror justeras. Det som först presenterades som självklar sanning visar sig vara rena lögner och desinformation.

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

@johanwicklen Stick reviews är nog mitt fjantigaste intresse,

[Surtvittvin ™ @surtvittvin]

Vilka byggnader var det ni stod och vaktade nu igen sa du @YB_Sodermalm?

[Tehran Tadhg @TadhgHickey]

If you don't accept an out of court settlement with your r*pist, you become the r*pist.

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

Haha helt sjukt vad många det är i som verkar stötta denna linje.

Detta är sån sjuk mobbnings mentalitet, mitt offer gör motstånd så jag måste eskalera och det är deras fel. Patetiskt

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

If the Iranian regime does not accept Trump’s off-ramp, they shift from being the victim to becoming the aggressor

[Anna @Mysfrid]

Vad händer med utredningen om Ulf Kristerssons inblandning som ordförande i Adoptionscentrum gällande de stulna barnen? Han var medveten om oegentligheterna, men agerade ändå inte mot att dessa adoptioner fortlöpte. Vad är det för statsminister vi har?

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

Barbarians

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

Ministry of Truth

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

German MEP Christine Anderson warns that under-16 social media bans are ultimately just a pretext to link everybody's online activity to a digital ID.

"The EU wants to scan private messages sent from your phone. They say it's about illegal material online, but in practice it means scanning everything that people say."

"It would inevitably require identifying every user through digital ID."

"That is called surveillance. And putting one's own citizens under surveillance is the practice best known in totalitarian regimes."

[Hüseyin Dogru @hussedogru]

UPDATE: A German court has suspended the freezing of my wife’s accounts.

It said it has “serious doubts” about the legality of the measure and a “massive interference” with her rights, dismissing claims I “control” her finances as normal family behaviour.

A rare sigh of relief for us.

[Ted-2-Truth @ViennaFranconia]

Stadsministern trummar ut stora nyheter: ’Vi har kapat ett ryskt fartyg!’ – krigsrubriker i media. När det sedan visar sig att Flora 1 får lämna 🇸🇪 utan åtal blir det bara en liten notis Samma mönster som de påhittade ubåtskränkningarna på 80-talet: syftet! Att sprida Ryssofobi!

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

@SnilletJohan Vill ha påsen utan att stötta dem 🥲

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

@Ride_fixer För att inte glömma, pissa framför oss annars tar vi ditt blod med våld.

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

@Ride_fixer Buga inför makten annars snor vi dina saker, frihetsberövar dig samtidigt som vi tvingar dig betala för kalaset.

”Säg att du kommer med en stor mängd alkohol över gränsen och säger inga kommentarer; …”

[Surtvittvin ™ @surtvittvin]

Det här är så okunnigt att jag måste flika in. Så här gick det till på riksintag klass 1 jag jobbade på.

- Upplåsning cellerna: 07.00- 07.10.
- Frukost på avdelning.
- 08.00- 08.20 de olika avdelningarna går gemensamt var för sig över gården till verkstaden.
Sysselsättning. Sortera skruvar i olika boxar som sen försluts och skickas iväg till en återförsäljare.
Detta görs under uppsikt av personal. Det är en oansenlig ström av skruvar.
- cirka 11.30 - 11.50 samtliga fångar lämnar verkstäderna avdelning för avdelning för lunch.

- lunch i kantin körs in på avdelningen för fångarna att fördela själva över avdelningen så att alla får (obs, alla får inte).

- runt 13 är alla tillbaka för att sortera skruv igen.

16 är det promenad i en timme utomhus eller aktiviteter i gympahallen. 17.10 cirka är alla inne på avdelningarna för middag. (Obs alla får inte middag)

17.30- 18.30 promenad för de som hade gympa och gympa för de som hade promenad. (Varannan dag)

19.00 inlåsning.

Ingen playstation på rummet. Böcker, tidningar (oftast porr), brevskrivning, med mera. När inlåsningen skett är det kutym att inte kalla på vakten. Behöver du skita eller pissa får du göra det i papperskorgen och tömma det sedan på morgonen.

Känns det som en miljö ni skulle trivas i? Som en fritidsgård va? Tänk er nu när cellerna dessutom är dubellbelagda.

Varför måste ni ljuga hela tiden? Räcker det inte med att beskriva sanningen?

[Masoud Pezeshkian @drpezeshkian]

To the people of the United States of America

[Mick Wallace @wallacemick]

This is the same 'Human Rights Watch' @hrw that refused to condemn the Western backed Saudi/UAE Genocide in Yemen. The same Human Rights Watch that supported the US backed Military Coup in Bolivia against the elected President Evo Morales. Spare us your lies please...

[The Kobeissi Letter @KobeissiLetter]

IRAN'S FULL "OPEN LETTER" TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:

"To the people of the United States of America, and to all those who, amid a flood of distortions and manufactured narratives, continue to seek the truth and aspire to a better life:

Iran—by this very name, character, and identity—is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in human history. Despite its historical and geographical advantages at various times, Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination. Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers—and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbors—Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it.

The Iranian people harbor no enmity toward other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighboring countries. Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective consciousness—not a temporary political stance.

For this reason, portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts. Such a perception is the product of political and economic whims of the powerful— the need to manufacture an enemy in order to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the arms industry, and control strategic markets. In such an environment, if a threat does not exist, it is invented.

Within this same framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of its forces, bases, and military capabilities around Iran—a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war. Recent American aggressions launched from these very bases have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is. Naturally, no country confronted with such conditions would forgo strengthening its defensive capabilities. What Iran has done—and continues to do—is a measured response grounded in legitimate self-defense, and by no means an initiation of war or aggression.

Relations between Iran and the United States were not originally hostile, and early interactions between the Iranian and American people were not marred with hostility or tension. The turning point, however, was the 1953 coup d’état—an illegal American intervention aimed at preventing the nationalization of Iran’s own resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and sowed deep distrust among Iranians toward U.S. policies. This distrust deepened further with America’s support for the Shah’s regime, its backing of Saddam Hussein during the imposed war of the 1980s, the imposition of the longest and most comprehensive sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unprovoked military aggression—twice, in the midst of negotiations—against Iran.

Yet all these pressures have failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country has grown stronger in many areas: literacy rates have tripled—from roughly 30% before the Islamic Revolution to over 90% today; higher education has expanded dramatically; significant advances have been achieved in modern technology; healthcare services have improved; and infrastructure has developed at a pace and scale incomparable to the past. These are measurable, observable realities that stand independent of fabricated narratives.

At the same time, the destructive and inhumane impact of sanctions, war, and aggression on the lives of the resilient Iranian people must not be underestimated. The continuation of military aggression and recent bombings profoundly affect people’s lives, attitudes, and perspectives. This reflects a fundamental human truth: when war inflicts irreparable harm on lives, homes, cities, and futures, people will not remain indifferent toward those responsible.

This raises a fundamental question: Exactly which of the American people’s interests are truly being served by this war? Was there any objective threat from Iran to justify such behavior? Does the massacre of innocent children, the destruction of cancer-treatment pharmaceutical facilities, or boasting about bombing a country “back to the stone ages” serve any purpose other than further damaging the United States’ global standing?
Iran pursued negotiations, reached an agreement, and fulfilled all its commitments. The decision to withdraw from that agreement, escalate toward confrontation, and launch two acts of aggression in the midst of negotiations were destructive choices made by the U.S. government—choices that served the delusions of a foreign aggressor.

Attacking Iran’s vital infrastructure—including energy and industrial facilities—directly targets the Iranian people. Beyond constituting a war crime, such actions carry consequences that extend far beyond Iran’s borders. They generate instability, increase human and economic costs, and perpetuate cycles of tension, planting seeds of resentment that will endure for years. This is not a demonstration of strength; it is a sign of strategic bewilderment and an inability to achieve a sustainable solution.

Is it not also the case that America has entered this aggression as a proxy for Israel, influenced and manipulated by that regime? Is it not true that Israel, by manufacturing an Iranian threat, seeks to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians? Is it not evident that Israel now aims to fight Iran to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar—shifting the burden of its delusions onto Iran, the region, and the United States itself in pursuit of illegitimate interests?

Is “America First” truly among the priorities of the U.S. government today?

I invite you to look beyond the machinery of misinformation—an integral part of this aggression—and instead speak with those who have visited Iran. Observe the many accomplished Iranian immigrants—educated in Iran—who now teach and conduct research at the world’s most prestigious universities, or contribute to the most advanced technology firms in the West. Do these realities align with the distortions you are being told about Iran and its people?

Today, the world stands at crossroads. Continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before. The choice between confrontation and engagement is both real and consequential; its outcome will shape the future for generations to come. Throughout its millennia of proud history, Iran has outlasted many aggressors. All that remains of them are tarnished names in history, while Iran endures—resilient, dignified, and proud."

[Christian Skagvard @ChrSkagvard]

@ambitionsverige Finns det någon direkt länk till förslaget?