ChrisBaba_Jr.

"Truth is always strong,no matter how weak it looks,and falsehood is always weak no matter how strong it looks."

[Fondre @UTDFondree]

🚨 Every major refereeing controversy that has gone Argentina’s way at the 2026 World Cup… and somehow it looks even worse than Qatar.

🇩🇿 Algeria: Messi caught Aïssa Mandi with his studs. No card. No VAR review.

🇦🇹 Austria: Mac Allister appeared to foul Schlager before Messi’s goal. Austria protested, but VAR allowed the goal.

🇨🇻 Cape Verde: Tagliafico’s challenge in the build-up to Argentina’s second wasn’t reviewed despite appeals.

🇪🇬 Egypt: A brilliant Egyptian goal was ruled out for an alleged foul at the very start of the move, over 80 metres from goal.

🇪🇬 Egypt (again): Egypt appealed for a penalty before Argentina’s late winner. Play continued, and Argentina scored moments later.

🇨🇭 Switzerland: Embolo was sent off after VAR intervened for an alleged dive near midfield, one of the most unusual VAR decisions fans have seen.

One controversial decision can happen. But when the same team benefits from them in almost every round, people are naturally going to ask questions.

[Motivaciones Fútbol @MotivacionesF]

🚨 ¡ESCÁNDALO MUNDIAL! 😳🇦🇷

El periodista francés Romain Molina lanzó una denuncia que está sacudiendo al fútbol.

Según su investigación, más de 42 millones de euros de los cerca de 300 millones que Argentina recibió tras conquistar el Mundial de Qatar 2022 habrían terminado en empresas fantasma.

Molina asegura que, apenas 9 días antes de la final entre Argentina y Francia, la AFA firmó un contrato que cedía el 30% de los ingresos del Mundial a una empresa llamada TourProdEnter.

También afirma que la FIFA habría transferido directamente parte de ese dinero a dicha empresa, la cual —según su investigación— no tendría vínculos con el fútbol.

⚠️ Hasta el momento, estas son acusaciones periodísticas realizadas por Romain Molina. No existe ninguna resolución judicial que confirme estos señalamientos.

[KDC Global @KDCGlobal_]

FIFA vs Argentina Allegations | 🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: More than €42 million of the €300 million Argentina received after winning the 2022 World Cup was diverted to shell companies.

A contract signed just 9 days BEFORE Argentina’s World Cup win vs France reportedly gave 30% of the AFA’s World Cup revenue to a company called TourProdEnter.

FIFA then allegedly transferred the World Cup funds directly to that company, which reportedly has NO links to football.

[Arturo Villegas @ArturoVill7]

🚨🧵 ESCÁNDALO MUNDIAL: Ya salió a la luz la investigación de Romain Molina, expuesta toda la podredumbre que envuelve a la AFA y a la FIFA. Se habla de un desvío de más de 300 millones de dólares que fueron lavados por los directivos de la AFA. El FBI ya está investigando... ¿Le habrá tocado algo a INFANTINO?

Lo más relevante de esta investigación es lo que ocurrió solo nueve días antes de que Argentina se consagrara campeona del mundo en Qatar (evento que muchos conocen como "El Robo del Siglo"). El presidente de la AFA, el “Chiqui” Tapia, otorgó un contrato de representación comercial de forma express a una empresa recién creada en Miami (sí, donde hoy juega Messi) llamada Tour Proenter.

Esta empresa fue fundada solo tres meses antes del torneo por un productor de teatro y político argentino: Javier Faroni. O sea, antes de empezar el mundial, este político ya tenía en sus manos un negocio para explotar comercialmente a Argentina… ¿Cómo sabía que la albiceleste haría un papel tan perfecto? El contrato se firmó a 9 días de la final; para ese entonces, queda claro que Tapia ya sabía que Argentina sería campeona del mundo sí o sí.

Pero esto se pone aún peor: todos los multimillonarios ingresos generados por los “éxitos” de la selección (derechos de TV, patrocinadores y premios de la FIFA) jamás llegaron a las cuentas de la AFA. En su lugar, entraron directamente a esta empresa en Miami, la cual se quedaba con una insólita comisión del 30%.

¿De verdad me están diciendo que un hombre arriesgó su patrimonio para crear una empresa en Miami (repito: donde juega Messi) con la simple "esperanza" de que Argentina hiciera una buena Copa del Mundo y que al final le saliera la jugada? Ni los empresarios más arriesgados del planeta hacen algo así. Es obvio que este sujeto sabía perfectamente que la FIFA ayudaría a Argentina a llegar a la final y coronarse campeona.

El esquema incluyó empresas pantalla en Bariloche: más de 40 millones de dólares fueron dispersados desde bancos estadounidenses hacia una red de empresas fantasma a nombre de prestanombres (personas con deudas previas o empleos comunes que, de pronto, pasaron a recibir millones y a justificar retornos monetarios falsificando prestaciones de servicios).

Casualmente, la vida de Tapia se llenó de lujos y excentricidades: mansiones en Miami, yates en Mónaco y jets privados. ¿Pagados por él? Por supuesto que no, todo financiado por la firma comercial en Miami.

Mientras tanto, el departamento legal de la FIFA, encabezado por Emilio García —quien es íntimo amigo de los dirigentes de la Conmebol y de la AFA—, se ha hecho de la vista gorda y no pretende investigar a los directivos argentinos.

Es una mafia total y seguramente enormes tajadas van a parar a las arcas de la FIFA a través de estos prestanombres y la firma en Miami. Ahora todo tiene sentido.

[Romain Molina @Romain_Molina]

For foreign publishers interested in translating my book, The Football Industry 1 [FIFA – Crime – Politics], please do not hesitate to contact me

Published two and a half years ago, the book revealed everything we are currently witnessing: the growing politicisation of the ‘new’ FIFA, the influence of the United States, Infantino’s fascination with the ‘powerful’ – including Trump – and several criminal networks still operating within the organisation

The book is only available in French at the moment, but I hope it will one day be published in other languages!

Keep the faith

https://t.co/qI7GSlmoiZ

[Romain Molina @Romain_Molina]

Je vous prépare une très grosse enquête sur la mafia du football argentin demain matin 🇦🇷

Probablement l'un des plus gros scandales couverts par la FIFA ces dernières années d'ailleurs

[Romain Molina @Romain_Molina]

In a normal world, this would be a global scandal

FIFA has suspended Jonathan Bukabakwa (alias Messi) for 20 years for the sexual abuse of minors. Yet he continues to coach young players in a team in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 🇨🇩

This symbolises the utter failure of the protection system touted by FIFA: world football’s governing body has botched investigations, let down victims (in Gabon, Haiti, the DRC, etc.) and shielded predatory systems that remain in place

How can they parade across all the media talking about “zero tolerance” whilst this coach continues undisturbed to coach teenagers?

My full investigation : https://t.co/0GDd09WaPA

[The Athletic | Football @TheAthleticFC]

Vozinha was one of the standout performers in this summer’s World Cup, and now the Cape Verde goalkeeper has been recognised by having a newly-discovered species named in his honour.

A new species of marine mollusk has been named after the 40-year-old by Spanish researcher Jesus Ortea.

Ortea made the discovery of the new species — a small sea slug of red appearance and about four millimeters that was, until his published work, unknown by science — and has named it Aldisa vozinhai (in English, Vozinha’s sea slug).

📝 @Millar_Colin

🔗 https://t.co/VbJBVRNBgv

[Polymarket Sports @PolymarketSport]

🚨New: Gianni Infantino looks STRESSED with Argentina losing

[Forbes @Forbes]

Ticket Prices Collapse Nearly 60% For World Cup Quarterfinal Match After USA, Portugal Eliminated
https://t.co/uSBqkeF8Ae

[Chelsea Backbencher @TheChelseaCru]

@mreparaguay @rramirezlezcano @PresidenciaPy @SantiPenap @IPParaguay @rnpy920am @ParaguayTVHD English translation.

[CAF @CAF_Online]

You showed the world who Cape Verde really is.
Thank you for everything. Forever proud. 🇨🇻💙

#FIFAWorldCup

[Football Tweet ⚽ @Footballtweet]

🚨🇸🇳 Shocking new revelations have emerged over the chaos surrounding the Senegal national team:

▪️ Several federation officials spent their stay focused on everything but football, with claims of gala evenings, vintage bottles of alcohol, expensive gifts, lavish spending, and "female company."

▪️ Pape Thiaw signed his contract just five hours before the match against Norway and was even considering not taking his place on the bench at first.

▪️ Some officials allegedly invited friends and content creators to join the delegation, while players looked on in disbelief at what was happening.

▪️ Hotel staff complained about the behaviour of several members of the Senegal delegation.

▪️ Some players were left to fend for themselves, ordering fast food and even leaving the hotel without supervision.

🗞️ @snewsafrica

[Larry Madowo @LarryMadowo]

BREAKING: 7 African countries have so far qualified for the knockout stage of the World Cup:
- Senegal
- Cabo Verde
- Ghana
- South Africa
- Morocco
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Egypt

[Kamala Dickson @ItsKamala]

[phone] WhatsApp Namba zao hizo hapo

[Kamala Dickson @ItsKamala]

Jamaa wanaleta haya Madude kutoka South delivery ni Entebbe kama kuna mtu anayataka nimpe namba yao Muongee (Karahal Goat ) Ni mazuri kwa ukame
Labda mbegu tutanunua kwenu

[Anna Tibaijuka @AnnaTibaijuka]

The Finance Act, 2026: What safeguard amendments could regulate Government Borrowing from the Central Bank?

1. The power to tax is one of the greatest powers of government. The power to create money is even greater. History teaches that this power can rescue nations in times of crisis, but it can also destroy currencies when discipline breaks down.

2. Governments are generally expected to borrow from financial markets, commercial banks, pension funds and the public through Treasury Bills and Treasury Bonds. Governments are discouraged from borrowing directly from their central banks because central banks possess a unique power: they can create money.

3. Also, when Government borrows from the public through Treasury Bills and Bonds, it must persuade investors to lend. Direct access to central-bank financing weakens this market discipline because Government no longer depends entirely on the judgement of investors.

4. The recent Finance Act, 2026, specifically the proposed amendments to section 69 of the Bank of Tanzania Act, has therefore generated considerable public debate. It introduces new provisions allowing Government, under specified emergency circumstances, to obtain temporary advances from the Bank of Tanzania.

5. Supporters argue that every country requires emergency financing mechanisms during disasters and major economic shocks. Critics fear that such provisions could become a back door through which governments gradually finance ordinary budget deficits by creating new money. Who is right? Both because the Finance Act, 2026 raises a question that goes beyond economics: not whether Government should ever borrow from the Central Bank, but whether the safeguards are strong enough to ensure that an emergency measure never becomes a habit.

7. Section 69(3) defines the conditions for drawing on funds from the Bank of Tanzania by the government: including the disaster clause under section 69(3)(a), the unforeseen economic shocks clause under section 69(3)(b) and the constitutional emergency clause under 69(3)(c).

8. Of the 3 provisions the riskiest one is section (b) because its current formulation is open ended and extremely broad stated as "an external economic event, circumstance or cause of exceptional magnitude and impact".

8. I propose it be replaced with something more objective like "an external economic shock certified jointly by the Minister responsible for Finance and the Governor of the Bank and reported to Parliament at its next sitting or within fourteen days, whichever is earlier."
The present wording is simply too elastic and could lead to problems. Why and how? Because it fails to define what constitutes: “exceptional” or “magnitude” or “impact” or “external economic event”? It does not guide what would qualify and what would not from an array of probable economic shocks including, a drought, a fall in gold prices, a rise in oil prices, a global recession, a decline in aid flows, a depreciation of the shilling and/or a failed tax collection target? As currently drafted, almost any significant economic difficulty could potentially be interpreted as falling within paragraph (b). That is where the real governance risk lies.

9. A parliamentarian's test: Whenever Parliament grants extraordinary powers to the Executive, it should ask three questions: Who decides? How much can be borrowed? Who checks the decision? The proposed section answers none of these clearly.

In this regard let me make some practical suggestions that might help preserve emergency flexibility while preventing possible abuse for consideration by our sitting Parliament.

SEE PART TWO

[Narendra Modi @narendramodi]

Congratulations to Praggnanandhaa for this remarkable feat!

This is indeed an incredible milestone that highlights his continued excellence.

My best wishes to him for his future endeavours.

@rpraggnachess

[ChrisBaba_Jr. @ChrisBabaJr_14]

@jemedarisaid TFF hawakutakiwa kuchukua pesa ya zawadi 90,000 USD hii ni zawadi ya timu igawanywe sawa kwa timu nzima iliyokuwa Morocco. CAF huwa wanatoa pesa za maaadalizi tangu hatua za awali, TFF waTanzania tunahitaji jibu haraka ili tujue hali halisi, naomba kuwasilisha