Christoph

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@SloboMiloAlt @AndrewCurran_ Annnnd I'm blocked. What else to expect from such a mental weakling.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@SloboMiloAlt @AndrewCurran_ Nope. That was due to tariffs and Taiwan aid. Try again.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@SloboMiloAlt @AndrewCurran_ Well the other person cannot use their water filled cranium to deduce that the deal is a non-starter since our defense contractors were not exempt and neither our ally Japan.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@millhist @pabis_eu @TokenGremlin It's so cringe. They aren't giving up higher enterprise sales in an attempt to dick mog ANT. Giving up potentially billions in the process.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@claudeai Grandma approved.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@millhist @pabis_eu @TokenGremlin Exactly. I don't get how this is a view in the community. Keeping an ace up your sleeve for some 'le epic pwn' is business malpractice, especially when ANT is ahead in revenue.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@JimRatVideo @Angaisb_ Kalshi flips with the wind. The remaining percent is still significant.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@AndrewCurran_ Didn't know the J-man was mr. bitches

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@kimmonismus I think that is Model 3. We may be on 5 now, considering 4 was last month. If the broad correlation to the ai2027 graph continues, time horizons are drastically increasing now to over 100 hours. Makes sense to hold close, prevents distillation.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@runyu887 @MTSlive Because the economic value of each AECI point gained is increasing. GPT 5.6 Sol is behind, but not drastically so. Yet newer models are able to do much meaningful work, which wasn't the case with 5.6 sol.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@haider1 I think it's further. Model 4 was a late September-early October model. Model 5 is probably on deck now.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@AndrewCurran_ Exciting. This is going to democratize triple-A quality game development, Indie studios and single person teams will be able to deliver much more ambitious projects.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@unusual_whales This is actually a great compromise. Communities need return while being insulated from utility changes.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@A_I_Learning @AlexBores @rsjacobi Yes. Which is why I don't believe they'd come to a deal. If your security is months behind the frontier, why would you pause while behind, or when you catch up?

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@AlexBores Why not call for a pause on automation level 5 RSI, the completely black box improvement cycle? It seems that level 4, where humans oversee and direct semi-autonomous improvement is permitted. The language is pretty definitive for a ban, when it sounds like a pause to autonomy.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@AlexBores @rsjacobi @A_I_Learning I don't think the leaders in China see it as 'racing off a cliff'.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@snowballist @AndrewCurran_ RSI has likely been achieved.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@AndrewCurran_ Plus to those in the safety camp, it seems that alignment scales. So for safety, it makes sense to move ahead of our current situation where models are capable but vulnerable to exploitation.

[Christoph @ChrisHa24873289]

@felps_bra @DKokotajlo Nah. Nationally that won't fly. and Hinojosa in Texas says all data centers in the pipeline, essentially from 2027-2028, will go through unabated.