Christianne B

👩‍👧‍👦Mom🧘‍♀️Fitness ♌️ Leo 👩🏼‍🏫 Momprenuer🏝♥️Summer👟Runner 🎶Music 💋 Beauty 💞Inspirer

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@elonmusk Coke Zero is better lol

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@hodgetwins Is she actually reading this speech off her phone 🤦🏼‍♀️🙄 she sounds incredibly uneducated and like a teenager they pulled off the streets … dear lord. Whoever Kamala peeps are for her campaign … they aren’t the brightest either.

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@catturd2 Pennsylvania

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@DerrickEvans4WV Trump 2024 from Pennsylvania

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@ElonMNews Yes yes yes 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[Yashar Ali 🐘 @yashar]

Full performance of Fast Car by Tracy Chapman with Luke Combs at the Grammys.

Her smile at the beginning is the best.

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

New Facebook Files Expose Biden Censorship-For-Spying Scheme

By @shellenberger @galexybrane @lwoodhouse

The Biden White House did not violate the First Amendment when it requested that Facebook censor information on Covid’s origin and vaccine side effects, say many policymakers, journalists, and legal experts. Rather, White House officials were simply expressing their free speech rights, and Facebook executives were free to ignore White House requests.

But newly released internal emails show that Facebook executives felt pressure to comply with White House demands in order to resolve a European Union ban on the social media company’s ability to transfer the data of European users to its servers in the United States.

In July 2021, after a White House official demanded that Facebook censor more information, Facebook’s Vice President of Global Affairs and Communications, Nick Clegg, asked his colleagues to comply. The reason? Because of “the bigger fish we have to fry with the Administration — data flows etc…”

By “data flows,” Clegg was referring to the EU’s demand that Facebook stop transferring European user data — which Facebook advertisers value for targeting customers — to the United States. 

The dispute was no small matter. In May of this year, EU regulators fined Meta, Facebook’s parent company, a record $1.3 billion for breaking the EU’s privacy regulations. The regulator said that Meta had violated a 2020 ruling by the EU’s highest court.

Two months later, on July 10, 2023, the Biden Administration and European Union announced a deal, the “EU-US Data Privacy Framework.” 

The series of events suggests a quid pro quo. Facebook would bow to White House requests for censorship in exchange for its help with the European Union.

“This is a gross violation of the First Amendment,” Columbia Law School Professor Philip Hamburger told Public, “not only because it involves what the Supreme Court considers ‘coercion,’ but also because it’s equally unconstitutional for the government to seek censorship through contract or conspiracy. And that’s what happened here.”

The White House wasn’t the only entity demanding that Facebook censor. NGOs and journalists from NBC and the New York Times were also pressuring Facebook to censor more. In response, Facebook executives weighed the radical “blackholing” measure, which blocks links to external web sites without informing users. 

But it’s clear from the newly released emails that Facebook executives felt the greatest pressure from the White House and that they feared the White House would hurt them in other ways.

Until now, critics of government demands for greater Facebook censorship have focused on the White House’s threat to revoke Facebook’s Section 230 status, which immunizes the company from many forms of liability.

But the new emails point to a form of government leverage over the platform that has been ignored until now: the EU demand on Facebook to stop data flows from the EU to the US, and the conditional willingness of the White House to push back against it.

A potential end of EU-to-US data flows is an even more urgent threat to Facebook’s business than White House threats to Section 230. About ten percent of Facebook’s total global advertising revenue, $1.2 billion, comes from selling ads in the EU.

While neither Congress nor the Biden Administration have shown much willingness to follow through on their threats to modify Section 230, the European Union has imposed fine after fine on Meta/Facebook. Last November, EU regulators fined Meta $291 million for a leak of its data. And in January of this year, they fined Meta $429 billion for making users accept personalized ads in order to use Facebook. 

All of which raises the question: why did EU leaders cut a deal with the Biden White House to allow Meta to move data to the United States? While it’s clear what Facebook and the White House got out of the secret quid pro quo, what did Europe get?

[1776 Project PAC | Text 1776 to 76176 @1776ProjectPac]

🚨NEW: We are excited to announce a full slate of endorsed candidates for November's school board elections in the state of Pennsylvania.

2023 is going to be a big year in the fight against CRT and for parental rights.

Get out and vote Nov. 7 for sanity in your school boards👇

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@ElonMuskAOC That’s rich, considering who that’s coming from 🙄🤦🏼‍♀️

[Not Elon Musk @ElonMuskAOC]

Is there a mental health crisis in America?

Asking for a friend.

[The Post Millennial @TPostMillennial]

Kevin McCarthy: "I know the night is late, but when we come back, our very first bill will repeal the funding for 87,000 new IRS agents."

[Christianne B @ChristianneB77]

@MattWallace888 There should be no forced vaccinations at any age

[Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist @DeAngelisCorey]

teachers unions held children's education hostage to secure multiple multi-billion-dollar ransom payments from taxpayers.

[Gays Against Groomers @againstgrmrs]

Whatever happened to the body positivity movement, or does that only apply to the morbidly obese now?

We should be teaching kids to love their bodies, not that if they don’t fit perfectly into what a stereotypical boy or girl is, that they need to start chopping off body parts.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

It isn’t cool for any celebrity, anywhere ever to defend what Balenciaga did.

My instincts as a mother override everything else.

It is actually completely fine to “cancel” pedophiles and child groomers.

Just want to make that clear.

[Gays Against Groomers @againstgrmrs]

These people are monsters.

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

It's all the same clowns who pushed 'the pandemic' and lockdowns and mask mandates and vax mandates who are pushing all the 'climate emergency' nonsense.

I can't believe anybody still trusts these individuals and organisations.

They do not care about you.

[Catturd ™ @catturd2]

The reason Mitch McConnell hasn’t said anything about the bullshit happening in Arizona is because he wants Blake Masters and Kari Lake to lose.

He only cares about power, money, and he absolutely hates us.

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

And screw all the people who used to scream at others in public for not wearing face diapers, or for not having them over their nose.

Pathetic little wannabe tyrants.

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

Hateful people will hate you for not hating all of the same people they hate.