@Sojka4President@StonksBatman This stock isn’t about fundamentals it’s about a short squeeze meaning an event that needs to happen in order for the shorts to be trapped so they are forced to buy back the shares they are short on point period and at a certain point in time they will be forced to do so…
Robinhood can 1:1 back these stock tokens with cash — not just shares of the stock.
That's why stock tokens are illegal in the United States of America and many other countries.
Vlad Tenev is just SBF version 2
🚨 #AMC
(READ AT YOUR OWN RISK — NOT FOR THE WEAK)
Reading through all $AMC comments, I see 3 distinct groups within the #APE community.
I’m NOT talking about traders, scalpers, flippers or supply and demand option plays etc etc -
I’m talking about the people who have actually been in this for the long run….
1 — The Complainers
They want their money back.
“AA this… AA that…”
They lack the financial understanding to recognize that the actions taken were necessary for AMC to still be here today.
You can hate the dilution. You can hate the decisions. You can hate how we got here.
But like it or not — he saved AMC.
Without those moves, we may not even be having this conversation today.
2 — The Early Profit Takers
This group averaged down (I know a lot of people did)
They worked to get their average below what they believe AMC should trade at under NORMAL fundamentals.
They see the potential, but they’re practical about the pump, the hype and the expectations. Speculative but optimistic.
Once the fundamentals make sense and AMC reaches what they believe is a reasonable intrinsic value, they’re out.
They make some money.
They get their investment back.
They move on.
3 — The Dividend Holders
This group understands a dividend isn’t happening tomorrow.
They know the current debt structure and loan terms contain restrictions that have to be dealt with first.
Their thesis is simple:
Fundamentals improve → AMC continues generating profits → cash builds → debt gets paid down/restructured → restrictive terms get renegotiated → the path to a dividend opens.
After Q3, they believe AMC could be sitting on $1B+ in cash, giving the company significantly more options to restructure, renegotiate and potentially pay down portions of its debt.
Once those restrictions are removed — and AMC is consistently profitable — they believe the dividend becomes inevitable. They’ll wait. They don’t care how long. They’ll wait.
And THAT, to them, is the final boss move.
They don’t care if AMC runs before then.
$10.
$20.
$30.
Whatever.
Because their thesis was never simply about AMC returning to fair value and pumping.
They believe a dividend is the nail in the coffin — the event that ultimately forces the issue and, if their synthetic-share thesis is correct, exposes what they believe has been hidden and forces those positions to close. Close how many floats?
And if that happens, they believe whatever high AMC reached before the dividend would be shattered.
But for this group, it’s bigger than the share price.
It proves what they’ve been saying for years.
Their conviction was never just about AMC. It was about what they believe is corruption and manipulation within the market itself — synthetic shares, hidden positions and a system they believe allowed it to continue.
AMC is simply where they chose to make their stand.
For them, that’s the endgame.
Fix the fundamentals.
Fix the debt.
Remove the restrictions.
Return the dividend.
Then force the issue.
And finally find out who was right.
#AMC #APE
So… which one are you?
Me?
2.5 — right in the middle.
I believe in the fundamentals. I believe AMC can get there on the numbers alone.
But I also believe something isn’t right.
Too much buying demand routed off-exchange and into dark pools, potentially muting what that demand would otherwise do in the lit market.
For how many days?
How many years?
How many shares?
How many IOUs?
How many floats?
At some point, you have to ask the question.
Where did all that demand go? What did they buy?
Maybe there’s an explanation for all of it.
But for me…
The math just isn’t mathing.
@AMKCShaw@Roadster_guy@Mattstradameus@AMKCShaw I know it’s in the words they make a market but I intend to disagree the way the US stock market system is set up they break the market / disrupt it … they should get rid of market makers period 😂 enough already 😂 let other systems control that
After MOASS I’ll be making the biggest donation ever made by a retail investor to health care programs cancer research and a poverty charity of my choice a minimum of 100m dollars will be donated #futureBillionare#AMCNOTLEAVING 🙏🙏
Het lek voor onze welvaartsstaat is niet dat we te weinig belastingen betalen op flexi-werk. Het lek is dat we structureel te veel belastingen betalen op regulier werk, waardoor werken te weinig loont, we het met te weinig mensen doen en dus met te weinig mensen bijdragen.
@dnx09 Boston wou bepaalde rol players niet mee opgeven in de deal daarom Miami , en Boston heeft groot probleem nu moeten praten met JB want al 2 off season op een rij aangeboden in trades ….
For some, conviction was lost on the way to $1, for others, they kept to their conviction and saw it as a great way to continue to DCA. Those who bought at $1 have now doubled that money in value.
Is investing a gamble? Absofuckinglutely!
You try to use technical analysis to limit your risk, you try to use financial reports to limit your risk, you try to watch the news to limit your risk, sometimes you just hope that the crayon color you’re eating (Cobalt Blue Crayons for me) is the right color.
I might be an average man, but I’m not a quitter, I HODL on for us!!