This is an actual page on the White House web site. It reads like something written about a third world dictator. So embarrassing. I have not seen any branch of the federal government sink this low in my lifetime.
"The Romans occupied England in the 5th century, so anyone of Roman descent has a historical claim to the land."
It's one of the best sketches I've ever seen, it is so accurate and highlights the situation in Palestine.
@andyblarsen My idea: pay the front office according to their wins.
The article below suggests paying coaches and FO staff for wins, but if I wrote it again I'd focus on the FO staff.
https://t.co/HC3S70CdRZ
@slcdunk I see the cheering coming from the current bench as a candidate for most important. I.e. if the players who are starting and playing now feel support from players who will start in October, that has got to be good for morale in the summer and in the fall
@NateDuncanNBA@johnhollinger I like @NateDuncanNBA's idea of paying orgs for wins. I also like paying coaches and front-office staff for wins. This could be a big incentive to win. See https://t.co/HC3S70CdRZ
@alex_mowry@ZachLowe_NBA@FredKatz Sure, your proposal fixes tanking, but there's no mechanism to help the truly bad teams. Your proposal makes it easy for a middling team to become better, but how does the worst team become a middle-of-the pack team?
@ZachLowe_NBA@FredKatz My idea: pay coaches and front-office staff for wins! Keep draft odds that help losing teams, but reward wins with $$.
https://t.co/HC3S70CdRZ
@pmddomingos That's not true. The smartest people in Silicon Valley are nearly all neither-wing; they're nearly all accidental moderates.
https://t.co/ogMaJHs63d
@ditheringfm Live or recorded NBA games are something that would make me consider purchasing a Vision Pro. But I wouldn't buy the hardware or games if they make me dizzy or are unpleasant to watch...
Vision Pro Frustration
Apple showed a live sporting event in the Vision Pro, but ruined it by trying to make it into a TV show.
Subscribe at https://t.co/MAKQBlkUMp
It’s hard for me to take someone seriously as an honest thinker when they argue guns are for resisting state overreach, but also accept “obey or get shot” as legitimate.
The US is now doing the kind of things we used to make fun of banana republics for doing when I was a kid.
I know not all the people who supported this man are idiots. Is there a point where the non-idiots say "enough is enough?"