'I was put in a police car and taken away.'
The father of a Rotherham grooming gang victim tells GB News how he was arrested twice when trying to rescue his daughter from an abuse den.
Interesting article from 2022.
Peter Sutherland was a special representative of the UN for Migration.
The replacement of the English people is part of the UN plan for their New World Order.
Leaked video of Mark Zuckerberg where he warned his Facebook execs NOT TO GET VACCINATED with the mRNA (COVID) vaccines because "we don't know the long-term side effects of modifying people's DNA & RNA"
He censored doctors, scientists, and the sick who denounced the ‘Vaccines"
Disgusting scenes as Katie Hopkins is chased out of the 'Dundee Arms' in Bethnal Green as she tried to watch the England game.
Harassed and pursued because of her beliefs.
Bethnal Green whites are a minority.
Be careful what you wish for you thick leftist c*nts.
Looks like we are getting crime minister number eleventy billion, of my lifetime.
See ya Starmer, I told you karma is a bitch 🤣🤣🤣
This election was always win/win for Reform voters.
We either gained an MP or got rid of the worst prime minister the UK has ever seen.
Oh, and it’s safe to say that @reformparty_uk are officially the opposition!
Well done @RobKenyonReform you did your country proud. 🩵
The Lord Chancellor's Department Just Published A Diversity Strategy. The Government's Own Guidance Says It's Unlawful.
David Lammy is the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice. He is constitutionally responsible for the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law in England and Wales. On 11th June 2026 his department published its Public Appointments Diversity and Outreach Strategy. Nick Timothy MP has written to him asking him to publish the legal advice behind it. He should.
The strategy sets an expectation that at least 90 percent of campaigns achieve demonstrable diversity on sift and interview panels, with panel selection informed by the current diversity of the board and any representation gaps. A panel is considered diverse where data shows representation of more than one sex, or at least one declared ethnic minority or disabled panel member. Any exceptions require documented justification and quarterly senior oversight.
The Equality Act permits positive action only in narrow circumstances. It must address a documented disadvantage, different needs, or disproportionately low participation. The department's own figures show 57 percent of its 2024 to 2025 appointments were women. That is a majority, not underrepresentation. The 12 percent ethnic minority figure is compared against 17 percent of the economically active population, but that is not the correct benchmark. The correct benchmark is the pool of qualified candidates, not the population as a whole.
The Government's own Equalities Office guidance is explicit. Creating schemes to benefit those with a particular protected characteristic, without evidence that the group is at a disadvantage or has different needs, is listed as an example of unlawful discrimination. So is requiring places reserved for those with particular protected characteristics on interview panels. The Ministry of Justice strategy appears to do both.
This is not a new position for Lammy. In 2019 he hosted a Labour conference event with Shami Chakrabarti specifically advocating time limited quotas for judicial diversity. The Lord Chief Justice responded at the time that such quotas are not compatible with appointment on merit nor, ultimately, in sustaining public confidence in the judiciary. Lammy is now implementing from the office of Lord Chancellor a policy the most senior judge in the country said would undermine confidence in judicial independence.
The stated 2028 target is a measurable reduction in the representation gap for underrepresented groups, moving the appointee profile toward the diversity profile of the UK economically active population. That is not a description of merit based selection. It is a description of demographic engineering with a deadline.
This sits within the same DEI framework documented across British institutions this week. The Sussex Police book club on inner white supremacy. The NHS pressure not to section black patients. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. Each implements SDG 10.2 and 10.3, the United Nations Agenda 2030 commitments to inclusion and reduced inequalities of outcome, adopted by Britain in 2015 without a single vote. The Ministry of Justice strategy is that same architecture applied to the department responsible for the rule of law itself.
If the Lord Chancellor's own department believes its diversity quota is lawful, the legal advice supporting that view should be published. If no such advice exists, that is the more serious problem. Either way, the department charged with upholding the law owes the public an answer.
"Lammy is now implementing from the office of Lord Chancellor a policy the most senior judge in the country said would undermine confidence in judicial independence."
Keir Starmer has just sent a message - from the G7 - to Andy Burnham that he can surrender any hope that he will walk away from being prime minister in any kind of smooth or orderly transfer of power. These are his on-camera words
“So very many times on my political journey people have said to me ‘it's not possible.’ They said it's not possible to turn the Labour Party around, it’s not possible to win an election, it’s not possible if you do win an election to invest in your public services and stabilise the economy. Wrong every time. And that's why I intend not to walk away from this, but to carry on with what I was elected to do, which is to serve this country and bring back the change that people desperately need in their lives.”
Someone close to @YoungBobRB needs to sit him down for a serious chat. What he’s doing isn’t safe without proper security and lads around him at all times. The left and their allies will try to do something to him soon that he won’t walk away from.
Seriously, someone have a word with him immediately. This isn’t the Britain we grew up in. We are living in dangerous times. I’m already seeing the left openly celebrating the violent attack on an autistic 17-year-old boy whose only “crime” is talking.
Remember what happened to Charlie Kirk, many of them would cheer his death. Never forget that. Support him, protect him, and make sure he stays safe. We have offered help, but he seems unwilling to take it.
@Keir_Starmer Starmer announces intention to implement facial recognition and digital ID to access social media
https://t.co/eVHeHDNtZm
Starmer, are you preparing to preparing to vacate not only Downing Street but also the UK?
🚨 BRITISH SPY UNIT ACCUSED OF MANIPULATING THE PUBLIC
If these allegations are true, this could become one of the biggest scandals in modern British history.
A secretive government unit known as RICU has been accused of shaping narratives, influencing public perception and managing how Britons respond to major national events.
To be clear, these are allegations.
But if proven true, they raise a chilling question:
Was the government simply informing the public...
Or attempting to influence how the public thinks?
Trust in institutions is already collapsing.
If people conclude that government agencies were managing public opinion rather than providing facts, the consequences could be enormous.
Because this isn't just about politics.
It's about whether the state crossed a line that should never be crossed.
@Alexarmstrong
Dear South Yorkshire Police @syptweet is it true you killed the man in the video below? Rumours suggest you did. Please make a statement ASAP as to his condition Chief Constable Lauren Poultney, Assistant CC's Sarah Poolman, Lindsey Butterfield, Hayley Barnett. @policeconduct
🚨 THE BATTLE FOR BRITAIN HAS BEGUN
Rev. Chris Wickland believes Britain is approaching a defining moment.
Not a debate about tax rates.
Not a debate about government spending.
A debate about the future identity of the nation itself.
That is why emotions are running so high across the country.
Because growing numbers of Britons no longer see this as a contest between political parties.
They see it as a battle over Britain's values, culture, traditions and future direction.
And they believe the outcome will shape the country for generations to come.
@revwickland