The DOJ urged a federal appeals court to reject a bid from climate activists to revive a lawsuit against President Trump’s executive orders to rescind funding for climate change initiatives.
The activists argue these orders harm their “constitutional right to life.”
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing an initiative that would funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into funding for “green jet fuel.”
The funds, however, would come from a budget designated for highways and roads and could also raise gas prices.
A bill being pushed by Democratic-Farmer-Labor politicians in Minnesota would create a state-run “superfund” for “climate change adaptation projects.”
This would incur major costs for families.
California’s energy crisis could pose a national security risk as they become more dependent on foreign oil.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright is sounding the alarm.
An investigation from the Daily Wire found that the leaders of three Louisiana-based environmental activist groups globetrot and socialize with prominent Democrats while simultaneously sounding the alarm about climate change.
Meet these jet-setting climate activists. 👇
Recently, Civitas Institute’s Professor John Yoo and Michael Toth, Civitas’s research director, wrote how “lawfare by American climate activists threatens significant damage to the nation’s domestic energy industry — and with it national security.
Rationing is being discussed in Australia and New Zealand after the closing of the Strait of Hormuz created a fuel shortage.
Yet how did Australia and New Zealand get to this point? John Gustavsson in National Review points to these countries’ own environmental policies.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is pointing fingers at President Donald Trump for California’s skyrocketing gas prices, but he only has himself to blame.
Steven Taff at the Washington Examiner explains the transparent double standard behind Newsom’s blame game.
Ever since the war with Iran broke out, Germany, Taiwan and California have tried to backpedal some of the policies implemented in recent years in response to “climate change.”
All three have had their politics shaped by green movements, and all three are more vulnerable for it.
Germany admits that “net zero” does not actually mean zero.
According to Germany’s minister for energy and economy, Katherina Reiche, the "EU should allow itself some wiggle room and, rather than net zero, accept that there might be a gap of maybe a 5 or 10 percent by 2050.”