World Climate Declaration, signed by more than 2000 scientists and experts. Message: there is no climate emergency. Book: The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC.
We are proud to announce that today, during a press conference in Brussels, we revealed that former Czech President Václav Klaus will succeed Guus Berkhout as President of Clintel after seven years.
Read the press release on our website. 👇
https://t.co/25cfJ8BKiy
EU Climate Scam Exposed: IPCC Admits Doomsday Scenario Was “Implausible” Garbage – But Brussels Refuses to Scrap a SINGLE Regulation Built on the Lie https://t.co/Fkyp7D1Vcf #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit
‘@RupertDarwall warns that many of our gas-fired power stations are now nearing the end of their operating life.
“We have a big problem of replacing this generating capacity in very short order,” he said at the @Prosperity_Inst’s 2026 Free Market Roadshow.
𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐍𝐞𝐭 𝐙𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐄𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐲 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐀 𝐃𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐄𝐧𝐝? Prof. Judith Curry argues that the rush toward wind and solar has consumed trillions while delivering grid instability, environmental trade-offs, and insufficient power. @curryja
How to manufacture a crisis:
A WHO commission wants to declare climate change a “global health emergency.”
Their big evidence? Rising heat deaths in Europe.
But once you adjust for an ageing society, the “crisis” essentially disappears.
Even more dishonestly, the report conceals that cold deaths have declined by approximately 250 times as much as heat deaths have risen.
https://t.co/8T5c9Hmesh
While Western elites preach "net zero," India is choosing growth, industry, and affordable energy. The U.S. and India have a historic opportunity to reject climate alarmism and build prosperity on the fuels that actually power modern civilization.
#ClimateRealism#EnergySecurity #India #USA #FossilFuels #NetZero #ClimateAlarmism #EconomicGrowth #Clintel
India isn't betting its future on climate fantasies. As hundreds of millions enter the middle class, it needs abundant, reliable energy—and that means coal, oil and natural gas. A U.S.-India energy alliance could deliver prosperity, strengthen energy security, and deal a major blow to the climate-industrial complex.
#ClimateRealism #EnergySecurity #India #USA #NaturalGas #Coal #NetZero #ClimatePolicy #Clintel
Families are struggling with rising energy bills.
Businesses are struggling with rising energy costs.
Yet Friends of the Earth wants courts—not elected politicians—to decide how fast society should decarbonize.
Is this climate policy, or judicial activism?
#EnergyPrices #ClimatePolicy #RuleOfLaw #Democracy #NetZero #EnergySecurity #ClimateLitigation #NuclearEnergy
Climate activists love to point out that fossil fuels lose energy as waste heat in 'primary energy' statistics. Fair enough.
But here's a question: what's the efficiency of a solar panel at night?
Zero.
The world isn't choosing energy sources based on theoretical peak efficiency. It's choosing sources that reliably deliver energy when people actually need it. That's why oil, coal, and natural gas still dominate global energy consumption despite decades of subsidies and mandates.
Not 1°C of warming has been reduced. Not one life was saved. Not 1 ppm of CO₂ has been avoided.
The total climate price tag by 2050 will be $275 trillion—amounting to $9.2 trillion every single year (McKinsey, 2022). That staggering total is roughly 2.5 times the entire annual GDP of the world.
Not one life has been saved from a changing climate that could have been better protected by leaving cheap, reliable, traditional energy in place. This is the ultimate belief gap, and it's staggering.
While the UN chased a global wealth redistribution bonanza, the cost to our future has been colossal. Imagine a world we could have built if that capital hadn't been poured into a failed ideology. The UN wealth redistribution scheme didn't save the planet, it funded a new, fabulously wealthy, bureaucratic class.
Reality is finally calling in the debt.
After decades of headlines predicting an endless escalation of climate disasters, a growing share of Americans are starting to question the narrative.
Yes, a majority still believe extreme weather is becoming more frequent and severe. But look closer: among Republicans, only 44% now say weather is more severe, while 50% say it's about the same. Even among the public overall, nearly 40% don't buy the 'more severe' claim.
Why the shift? More people are looking beyond the fear-driven headlines and asking a simple question: Do the actual data support the rhetoric?
The climate debate is slowly moving from emotion back toward evidence. And that's a trend the alarmists never expected.
Tony Blair helped launch Net Zero. Now even he argues that affordable energy, economic growth and AI should take priority over climate dogma. How much longer will policymakers ignore reality?
#NetZero#ClimateRealism#Energy#EconomicGrowth#Clintel
Portraying CO₂ as a threat to climate and health is being used to justify trillions in redirected capital, heavy regulation, and centralised control.
But the financial incentives driving this narrative ignore a basic biological truth. Commercial greenhouse operators routinely enrich their air to 1,000–1,200 ppm — nearly triple atmospheric levels — because it directly fuels photosynthesis, boosting crop yields by 30% to over 100%. If it were a pollutant, they'd be killing their profits. Instead, they are leveraging more robust plant food.
This same principle is taking place globally. At around 430 ppm, rising atmospheric CO₂ is driving measurable global greening and boosting crop productivity, as confirmed by NASA satellite observations and NBER analysis.
Higher CO₂ also improves plant water-use efficiency, allowing vegetation to thrive in previously arid or desert regions, such as the Sahara, which has lost 700,000 square kilometres of desert sands to new leaf growth. These real-world results overwhelm the harsh computer models every time.
The narrative treats CO₂ as a toxin; the data shows it as a biological godsend.
The moment you hear the word "irreversible" in a climate discussion, you're no longer hearing science... you're hearing a narrative. Nothing in Earth's climate history suggests a system incapable of change, recovery, or reversal.
For years, activists warned that ocean “acidification” would devastate marine ecosystems. Yet oceans remain alkaline and predicted pH changes fall within natural variability. The scare campaign is far stronger than the evidence.
#ClimateRealism#ClimateScare#Clintel
#ClimateAlarmism #OceanAcidification #Clintel