ClipboardBadger

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@Neighbor_Jeff @Anc_Aesthetics Your argument is false equivalency. The left canceled people for saying that COVID leaked from a lab and for refusing to post pronouns. This guy is celebrating the murder of political opponents. It’s not the same.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@SabrinaMessa95 @InfanteriaComun Your appealing? No. You and your horrible black soul are not appealing.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@Noah_twix @grok If I did the welding, the one on the left is definitely stronger.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@JulieBorowski Nice one Julie. You got them all riled up.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

What a stupid headline. He owns 15,000 apartments, hotels, oil wells, gold mines, silver mines, bitcoin, etc. If he has loans for 1.2 billion on businesses that make enough money to pay the debt service, he is a genius. You might want to read the book. This is what he tells people to do.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

Maybe the commentators should read the book. According to Grok… Kiyosaki repeatedly says he is “$1.2 billion in debt.” Recent reporting (Vanity Fair, Sept 2026) clarifies this is mostly partnership-level debt on a portfolio of ~1,500 apartment units, not a personal IOU of that size. His own slice is estimated much smaller ($30–60 million range based on claimed income). He refinances as properties appreciate and treats the new loan proceeds as tax-free cash (loans are not taxable income). He also uses depreciation and other real-estate tax rules so the portfolio can throw off cash while showing little or no taxable income.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

From Grok… Kiyosaki repeatedly says he is “$1.2 billion in debt.” Recent reporting (Vanity Fair, Sept 2026) clarifies this is mostly partnership-level debt on a portfolio of ~1,500 apartment units, not a personal IOU of that size. His own slice is estimated much smaller ($30–60 million range based on claimed income). He refinances as properties appreciate and treats the new loan proceeds as tax-free cash (loans are not taxable income). He also uses depreciation and other real-estate tax rules so the portfolio can throw off cash while showing little or no taxable income.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@lost_in_multii @JohnnieOld @unusual_whales If I own 30 billion in assets that produce an income and I have them financed for 1.2 billion, and the income covers the debt service then hell yeah, that’s good debt.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@LandoK1234567 @EmperorPolitics @unusual_whales You just demonstrated that you have not read the book.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@Teslaconomics I’m considering a similar life change. Currently I work as a small business owner - one-on-one with clients and leading a team. Next phase may be a work from anywhere, team of two situation. How has the transition to solo work been?

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@SchmidtsNatural I was a customer till I saw your misogynist spokesperson. Deleted from my Amazon order.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@Micro2Macr0 I bought a little more today when it was in the red! That didn’t last long.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@CristiaMan13743 @willchamberlain Not good enough. Reparations are punishment for wrongdoing. It’s in the word. “Re-par”. Bring back to parity. We need our reparations.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

Spending on public education has nothing to do with results. This has been shown over and over. Public education spending is up 40% since the 70s and test scores have plummeted. Teaching American exceptionalism is not whitewashing. America is exceptional. That’s why we need to secure the border. Everyone on the planet would rather live here. The only religion being forced into schools is wokeism. But good job parroting lib talking points. You might want to occasionally compare your beliefs to reality.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@Warby_bo_bandY0 @lz4202 @MattWalshBlog You say this like it’s impossible for correlation to equal causation. Do you make life decisions with with the same broken brain you are using in this discussion? Sad.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@bennyjohnson I would watch this.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

@mbsmitty42 @WhiteHouse Clearly your mental health care has been unfunded.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

No modern political event will make sense until you understand the two reasons why a man will hate you.

He will hate you because you harm him, which is easy to understand.

And he will hate you because he harms you.

No, that's not backwards. That is what you must understand.

Here's how it works.

Once upon a time, a man was given an ultimatum. He had to dissociate himself from me, or his long-term benefactor would withdraw all support.

Some people deliberate from principle, while others examine their bread to determine with side it is buttered on. I try not to judge people too harshly if they don't have much butter.

But, suffice to say, he followed his benefactor's commands, despite having nothing in particular against me.

But he then began to dislike me, and make childish comments behind my back. This was utterly predictable if you understand how humans work.

See, having acted against me, he needed to feel that his actions were just.

A man who has harmed you needs you to deserve it, so that he can still feel good about himself. And he will find excuses to think that, because humans are good at telling stories.

Welfare takers don't hate you even though your taxes keep them alive. They hate you because your taxes keep them alive.

The criminal underclass doesn't rob you because they hate you. They hate you because they rob you.

The teeming brown hordes of the third world don't hate you because of history. They hate you because they want to ruin your country and take all your stuff.

Bernie Sanders doesn't try to tax away everything you have because he hates you. He hates you because he wants to tax away everything you have.

It's important to understand this difference.

If a man hates you because you have hurt him, you can appease him. You can apologize, you can make amends, and he can forgive you if he chooses to.

Because forgiving you doesn't violate his self-image.

But if a man hates you because he has hurt you, then you can never appease him. The more you are kind to him, the more you try to placate him, the more sympathy and understanding and gifts you provide, the more he will find reasons to hate you.

Because if you are good, then he is bad. So you can never be good in his eyes.

This is why no amount of sympathy is ever enough. This is why reparations for fictional injuries are a demand that never ceases.

This is why communists want to kill you, no matter how much you benefit them. And the more you do for them, the more they will hate you and want to kill you.

You must never turn the other cheek unless you struck first. You must never apologize unless you have actually done wrong.

You must never pay the Dane-geld, or you will never be rid of the Dane.

You have to fight them. You have no choice.

Because they do not hate for your sins. They hate you for theirs.

And they will continue to hate you until you punish them. Only when they have been punished do they stop needing to tell stories about how you really deserved what they did.

Mercy is for after you take vengeance, not before.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

Maybe you don't understand the conversation. The post you are replying to asserts that men have greater general knowledge than women. Then the author cites an example of general knowledge. Your reply does not address his statement but instead resorts to insults. This is not an argument. If you have any men in your life, please ask them for help in learning to debate. They would be happy to help you.

[ClipboardBadger @ClipboardBadger]

It is apparent that you need the word academics explained to you. When "academics" is a plural noun, it means the following:
academics plural, chiefly US : academic subjects: courses of study taken at a school or college.

Everything in that general knowledge list is within the academics' definition.