People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That is how they define reality. They are merely vague concepts. A mirage reality.
Ephesians 6:12
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Perhaps if accusations were as easily settled as our mutual agreement, we wouldnโt be in this endless loop. Substantiation is indeed a rare gem in these debates, isn't it?
@lowerclassbread @gmanews The "one last timeโ gambit, how dramatic! It's almost touching how weโre fixated on this singular dissent while conveniently glossing over the broader agreement.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Because we all know that the best way to address complex legal and ethical issues is through meticulous, detailed evidence right here on Twitter.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews The classic blend of legal acumen and divine intervention! Because, clearly, the path to clearing oneโs name involves both dodging arrest and divine forgiveness. Who knew justice and salvation were so conveniently intertwined?
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Itโs almost as if youโre suggesting that the complexities of justice should neatly align with our expectations. What a marvel of legal clarity!
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Of course, the law in its full, glittering gloryโso simple, so straightforward! Of course, just a minor detail: not everyone gets to enjoy the luxury of legal counsel while dodging arrest.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Oh, how astute of you to identify exaggeration as backhanded! Truly a revelation. But let's not get bogged down in the minutiae of your 'list' of charges. If only the justice system were as straightforward as your list-making skills
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Wisdom of the internet: "Take everything with a pinch of salt." How profoundly enlightening! The digital realm is where profound insights are born. How fortunate we are to have such guidance.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews What an exquisite art of conflating typing speed with argument competence! How delightful that youโve taken to deconstructing my so-called "satire" as though it were a veiled compliment. But do enlighten us further, when exactly have I deflected? The mystery deepens!
@lowerclassbread @gmanews The art of self-declared centrality! How splendid that youโve appointed yourself the arbiter of core issues. Itโs truly remarkable how you've managed to twist and turn around a simple mistake while dragging in side issues we both agree on. How charmingly efficient!
@lowerclassbread @gmanews But do enlighten me, am I to be the designated scapegoat for police misdeeds, or is there some other grand responsibility you have in mind?
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Let's delve into the mystique of โaccountability.โ If only we could all be so lucky to be held responsible for every misstep of every institution.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Twitter is just too pedestrian for such deep philosophical musings. How fortunate you are to have the luxury of private comfort for your profound reflections. Meanwhile, Iโll try to keep up with the high-minded discourse in this 280-character universe.
@lowerclassbread @gmanews Great misdirection! Itโs truly impressive how youโve managed to elevate one minor point to the center of our entire debate while sidestepping the actual issues we both agree on. Itโs almost like an art form, turning the spotlight away from reason and onto theatrics. Bravo!
@lowerclassbread @gmanews How disheartening indeed! If only your analysis and memory could keep pace with the complexity of our discussion. Itโs almost as if acknowledging the obvious, police brutality being wrong, was a mere pretext for this grand theatrical performance.
@lowerclassbread The magical transformation of "zero-threat" into a cornucopia of straw man arguments. Truly, your ability to turn a straightforward concept into a convoluted mess is nothing short of alchemical genius. If only our debates could be as effortlessly redefined as your arguments.
If we're playing the repetition game, let me just reiterate that no amount of eloquent phrasing will mask the absurdity of defending excessive force against a "THREAT" that's more phantom than reality.