CloudAglow

AI AIGC

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

@MaggiMay76 @man_your_brooms @FoxNews Yes, making a joke like that in this situation was indeed a bit inappropriate.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

@Kakarotkll @Polymarket 😆

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

@Manchubebe @Geiger_Capital 🤣🤣🤣

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

Even if all of those accusations were true, that still would not justify saying, “So it’s okay to kill him.”

That is exactly why, whether in China, the United States, or most modern legal systems in Europe, private individuals are not allowed to decide guilt, impose punishment, or take someone’s life on their own.

The reason is simple: people can be wrong, manipulated by rumors, or mistake anger for justice. Even formal judicial systems with evidence and legal procedures can make mistakes—let alone online rumors and personal judgment.

Once vigilantism is normalized, the victims will not only be people who actually did something wrong. Innocent people who were falsely accused will inevitably be harmed as well.

If the law is inadequate, we can push for new legislation, stronger penalties, and better institutions. But once someone is killed by vigilante violence, there is no appeal and no way to correct the mistake.

So I oppose animal abuse, and I also oppose turning vigilantism into “justice.”

Glorifying this kind of violence does not protect justice. It weakens the basic protection every person should have against being falsely accused and subjected to vigilante violence.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

@mcgfdx0 @the_whisper_1 あなたの考えも理解できますし、その気持ちも尊重します。

少なくとも、これ以上このようなことで命が傷つけられないことを願っています。

彼女のご冥福をお祈りします。

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

私が一番大切にしたいのは、結局のところ命を守ることです。

地域によっては法律が十分に整っておらず、悪いことをした人が相応の処罰を受けないこともあるでしょう。それに怒りを感じるのは当然です。でも、それが私刑を正当化する理由にはならないと思います。

一度でも私刑を称賛し始めれば、個人が自分の持っている情報や感情だけで、誰が悪いのか、どんな罰を受けるべきなのかを決めていいことになります。それはとても危険です。

私はこれまで、デマや誤った情報、思い込みによって、無実の人が攻撃されたり傷つけられたりしたケースを何度も見てきました。

悪い人が十分に罰せられないのは確かに残念です。でも、無実の人を誤って傷つけたり、まして命を奪ってしまったりすることは、もっと取り返しのつかない悲劇です。

だから私は動物虐待にも反対しますし、私刑や殺人、自殺を「正義」として美化することにも反対します。

命を守るということは、自分が大切だと思う命だけを守ることではないはずです。

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

この話の核心は、父親が知っていたかどうかではなく、私刑を正当化していいのかどうかだと思います。

動物虐待がひどい行為であることと、個人が自分の判断で相手を傷つけたり、命を奪ったりしていいかどうかは別の問題です。

彼女の怒り自体は理解できますが、その行動まで称賛するべきではありません。動物虐待に反対することと、私刑や殺人、自殺を美化しないことは両立します。

私は動物虐待にも反対しますし、私刑にも反対します。

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

猫が虐待された事実を無視しているわけではありません。動物虐待は当然、非難されるべきです。

しかし、「猫が先に傷つけられた」という事実は、別の人間を傷つけたり、まして無関係な人の命を奪ったりする正当化にはなりません。

動物虐待を批判することと、私刑や報復殺人を否定することは両立します。

もし本当に父親まで被害に遭ったのであれば、その人は猫を虐待した本人ですらありません。無関係な人まで傷つけることを「動物を守るため」と正当化するなら、それは正義ではなく、単なる暴力です。

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

It might be a network issue. I’ve noticed that GPT Web can respond at very different speeds depending on the proxy or country I’m connected through—some locations feel noticeably slower, while others are much faster.

DeepSeek Flash feels pretty fast to me, though. I haven’t really used it for coding or programming yet. So far, I’ve mainly used DeepSeek for chatting and roleplay in SillyTavern.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

According to the rumors, the person who died was his father.

I cannot understand why he would abuse animals. Of course, I am not a vegetarian—I am specifically talking about deliberately torturing animals for pleasure.

But I also cannot understand why someone would choose to hurt or even kill another person over a cat.

Opposing animal abuse does not mean you have the right to use violence to take another person's life. Whatever the reason, deliberately harming another person also violates the most basic rights to life and personal safety.

If someone acts in the name of “protecting animals” or “seeking justice,” but ends up inflicting violence on an innocent person, that is not kindness. It is simply anger disguised as righteousness. True compassion should never come at the cost of harming innocent people.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

Grok can do NSFW, so does that mean Astra is worse than Grok? DeepSeek is better at Chinese, so does that mean Astra is trash?

By that logic, I could easily come up with dozens of examples to “prove” that any model is bad. Every model has its strengths and weaknesses. Judging an entire model based on one specific capability is ridiculous.

You can disagree and argue your point, but there’s no need to make it personal. At least I wouldn’t call you stupid just because I think your argument is stupid.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

They’re misleading you. I’ve looked into what these people’s lives are actually like. Even young college graduates are frequently pushed into low-paid work, and middle-aged workers often have it even worse. What’s most absurd is that some people blame low income entirely on the individual, as if being poor is something they deserve. A healthy society shouldn’t divide people into different classes of worth—it should ensure that ordinary people have basic labor protections, social security, dignity, and aren’t forced to live under excessive pressure.

[CloudAglow @CloudAglow]

I really want to get the 20X, mainly because the value for money is so good, and I’m also a little worried that I might not be able to get such a good deal in the future. But with my current business model, 2×/3× is already more than enough, so buying the 20X now would feel a bit wasteful. Once the business is fully up and running, I’ll definitely consider upgrading to the 20X.