At Halden, coverage after a 1-in-10 year loss fell below its 130% trigger. The owner switched on the agreed response: pausing new US casualty growth.
The board report shows which responses are running.
An appetite statement says what the board won't accept. It rarely says what happens when a limit gets close.
Here's how Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, sets up its appetite.
A few statements for the whole firm first. Then layers for class, subclass and risk. Softer statements, like fair customer outcomes, use indicators.
Each statement has responses waiting on the rack, with an owner and a trigger.
Ask where the risk framework lives, and you get a list of documents.
Here's how Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, sets up its framework on a page instead.
"This is a solid start to the year."
Lloyd's now operates in "a world that is structurally disorderly".
Patrick Tiernan, Lloyd's Chief Executive
So we turned Lloyd's first half into five questions for your own board.
One of them: "How much of our 2027 profit plan rests on investment return?"
Why ask it: rising yields cut Lloyd's investment return by 43%, even as underwriting profit grew.
3/
On Friday, we turn the slides into the questions a board should be ready to answer.
The full post, with every chart and its source: https://t.co/dBCoES63FB
2/
The headline is a solid half.
Underneath: five risks the Chief Executive named, a class that swung to a loss, acquisition costs rising faster than premium, and a portfolio that is mostly bonds.
Again and again we helped risk teams build reports the business didn't engage with. Accurate. Well-designed. Unread.
The problem wasn't the report. It was where the report lived.
The board wants to see where the premium comes from and where the risk sits, without more pages in the risk report.
Follow along as we show how Halden runs its risk reporting inside its business report, one report at a time.