Cody Correll

Husband and Father. “The Lord is with me; I will not be afraid. What can mere mortals do to me?” Psalm 118:6

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@lukeappleton Allowed to, just doesn’t carry much weight

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@Bergundy1167454 @Men_4_Choice See above.

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@Bergundy1167454 @Men_4_Choice This misframing the issue. Forcing a women to get pregnant or forcing her to be a surrogate would be forcing organ donation. I simply advocate that human beings shouldn’t be killed in the womb.

On top of that, parents have obligations to their kids, like providing for them

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@groove_sdc Any proof of this? Conservatives want to judge people based on actions, not skin color. Is that bad?

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@LutheranAnswers lol your exactly right. I’m assuming this is a joke and there are a lot of people who don’t get that

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@daviddunn177 Sure. However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t get rid of the illegal immigrants.

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@LeftyWinter Because our central focus isnt on race? We don’t want to view everything through a racial lens?

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@Inxplcbly_Xplct @byelin Well thanks for showing your true colors to everyone. It’s helpful to know just how you feel. Again, I hope you get the help you need. I won’t be responding anymore. Have a good one

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@ArmandoNDK So the courts rule against you and your solution is to destroy it. What a bunch of fascists

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 Explicitly alive with huge modifications. Per kagen on the dissent, it is basically dead as nearly impossible to prove.

But either way, we will see what the courts rule and what they say. I have no idea if it will be deemed illegal or not. Leaning yes, who knows. Have a good one

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 Except looking at race is now null and void. That was prior to the scotus ruling

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 We shall see what they rule. Will be an interesting read of the ruling either way

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 Except that is no longer the law lol. But do you understand the word objective? It’s important here

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@Inxplcbly_Xplct @byelin Well clearly you are a very well rounded and mentally stable person. No need to continue this conversation when this is how you behave.

Wish you the best

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 When removing a race based map, they are under no legal obligation to gerrymander for the left. The law is they can’t do it for the sole purpose of partisanship, if they actually did it for the left, that would have been illegal. The law isn’t about the results, but intent.

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@KevinTvfl @byelin I’m not sure I understand your point. I don’t deny libs gerrymander and have done it way longer.

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@Inxplcbly_Xplct @byelin If you think we still need race based laws today, not 70 years ago, you are crazy. Who they vote for is irrelevant. We shouldn’t judge people and separate them based on skin color.

Unless you want us to judge based on the color of skin? Conservatives don’t

[Cody Correll @CodyJCorrell]

@countryclubc2 The reason: “we redrew the maps because the old ones were based on race and we needed to stop being racist” would pass.

Again not saying that it wasn’t partisan, I’d bet it was. But not objective at all.

So yeah, you had a false dichotomy