Pudgy and Lil, we brought something for yall in Bangkok 🇹🇭
This deal took us 6 months.
Yall can get a free $500 membership package for co-working space for 3 months in Bangkok.
Let's dive in 👇
Now you can play @CoinRush_game on your mobile!
No need to worry about sudden deaths.
Wallet browser login is supported, such as @MetaMask @okxweb3 @coinbase
https://t.co/k1EVF6BUzb
Airdrops are presents.
It is not a reward.
It is not a loyalty program.
It is not a growth hack.
It is a present.
It is as simple as that.
A present.
If you ask what you get from giving a present.
It is a present no more.
The meaning is gone.
Good faith over.
crypto gaming in a nutshell
"we raised $30m, have 100 devs, worked at Riot, EA, Activision, building AAAAA game"
- 12 players
"no vc money, small team, onchain tamagotchi"
- $20m in revenue
Today @doodles announced their migration to @base.
I got to debut the news with @jholguin and @jessepollak on the pod and discuss the migration + what this exciting move means for both Base and Doodles.
Live exclusively first on @podsdotmedia. Collect the episode tomorrow.
on-chain vs. onchain: which is right?
fwiw no grammarian would say these are different words
just like they wouldn't say "on-line" or "online" are different words, rather they're alt spellings, neither incorrect
on-line was used in the 90s, then usage consensus moved to online because it's shorter and easier
we're seeing a shift from "on-chain to "onchain" now for similar reasons
yet the "onchain" shift has more debate, a schism stemming from the grammatical concepts of denotation and connotation
denotation = a word's explicit technical meaning
connotation = the extra shades of meaning that a word can evolve to imply
in the beginning, there was only on-chain, and at first it only denoted "a project fully stored on a blockchain with no external dependencies"
later - in parallel with the usage shift to the onchain spelling - the word has *also* evolved to connotate "a project that uses blockchain, even if it has external dependencies"
originalists prefer the "on-chain" usage and its technical denotation, as they see "onchain" and its more expansive connotation as a bastardization and watering down of sorts
all that said though, on-chain and onchain aren't technically different words, and neither are incorrect, it's ultimately just different spellings
yet we do see varying *practical* usage: on-chain tends to just be used in a denotative sense, while onchain is often used interchangeably between its denotative and connatative senses
whichever spelling you prefer is up to you, you won't be wrong either way, though i do expect the simpler onchain to win out like online did
imo if you use either of these spellings connotatively, that's a step up over "c r y p t o"
either is more aesthetic, more immediately inferrable, and with less connotative baggage, js
you can also use on-chain/onchain as an adjective or adverb, and i think in adverbial uses onchain looks much cleaner (while they both look fine as adjectives), so i personally use onchain everywhere now
NFTs come back when gamefi comes back imo, which games are launching this summer? i believe there are a few, assume that will spark attention on NFTs especially the ones that have use in-game
RFB: a tool that lets a meme community run a campaign across socials:
1. see a piece of content and tap a link to earn
2. go to a landing page and create a new smart wallet
3. verify their tiktok/instagram/twitter for sybil
4. receive the meme
would be incredibly powerful.
🔝I ranked 1st in yesterday's competition! Climbing the ranks in CoinRush!
🚀 Currently dominating the leaderboard and enjoying the sweet rewards.
🏆 Ready to challenge me? Join the game and see if you can top the charts!
https://t.co/3EGzjGzP6E
#CoinRush#CoinRush