https://t.co/CQ6LvfsfWR
Like, subscribe a great guy, with a great message.
Not everything on the internet is as frustrating as twitter.
He doesn't post too often -watch some old ones, they'll brighten your day and bring warmth to your ♥️
@ClawToTheCore@Gracie_Blue89 No, I don't find the image suggestive at all. I find the caption to be a bonkers sign of what was acceptable at that time.
Hey, so I imagine you might already know. But just incase a lot of your content is illegal in the UK now. People who downloaded some of your clips could go to jail for 2 years if they don't realize or not.
Also a problem for you if you ever travel there.
It could be worth making sure your fans are aware of this and make sure they delete anything they have which applies. DM if you want to discuss details.
@seany991@SkintyalFia It's crazy, not too long ago Mississippi raised its minimum marriage ages in a 1957 to 15, from 13.
I just can't understand how 1950's life could be like that.
You seem to have misunderstood. I didn't provide an excuse I asked questions about that era.
You can hear the audience laugh, and he didn't get any pressure after the showing.
Indicating totally different reality than we have now. Highlighted by one of the replies that they had topless 16 & 17 year olds on page 3. That's insane to think about through the lens of today. And that was just the weekly newspaper!
@LollaThinks@rickygervais@wossy 90's early 2000's had very different standards back then.
Page 3, had topless 16 & 17 year olds.
Sexually suggestive picture of younger was common, pop magazines were full of it.
It was a very different look how casual, funny and unconcerned this was
https://t.co/h1Ky7Ds9E4
@mikestabile 'Your being a bit paranoid there mate, I'm sure they'll be fair'
A man had his house raided 'because he burgled pasta' they didn't break into his safe to find more pasta, they wanted to find something 'better' to target him with.
https://t.co/ruJ98eZrex
The long waited body cam footage from my arrest dated August 2025. 10 police officers in ski masks, face shields and equipped with a battering ram entered my home for an allegation of some burgled pasta from a complimentary buffet in a migrant hotel. Some points to note:-
• excuse the penguin dressing gown!
• there was 95 minutes of footage on 8 body cams so I’ve trimmed it down as best as I can
• They refused to let me help my terminally ill mother out of bed
• They locked a chihuahua and a shih tzu in separate room to us and initially refused to let them out over “safety concerns”
• my girlfriend who is type 1 diabetic and requires insulin to survive, needed insulin immediately. When we were in the lounge it was asked for and told the officers where it was in the bedroom. Apparently 6 officers couldn’t find it after 10 minutes until I said it was a medical emergency and they finally let my girlfriend retrieve it in the exact place she said it was.
• The female police officer in the van with me had the language of a 9 year old on some occasions, using phrases such as “more bigger” and finishing sentences such as “but yeah”. Extremely unprofessional.
A 30 thousand pound operation over an allegation of unpaid plate of pasta from a complimentary migrant buffet.
@mikestabile I believe the power at be laughed when they saw how broad this is. They rubbed their hands and prayed a wilful idiot could get this through.
I'm not against tighter limits on more on the edge stuff, but this is quite crazy.
https://t.co/CXrK4hpCh4
I may be mistaken, but the new law appears to criminalise one of the most widely viewed mainstream adult scenes of the past decade: the Mia Khalifa hijab scene. Individuals who, without realising it, still possess a clip of that scene on an old device could now face imprisonment. The same risk would apply to Mia Khalifa herself should she enter the UK.
The scene depicts her bringing her boyfriend home to meet her mother, after which the encounter develops into a threesome. Most viewers, I would suggest, had little or no interest in (or awareness of) the precise dialogue and therefore never registered any indication that the older woman was portrayed as a stepmother. As a result, one of the most viral adult scenes of its era is now potentially illegal under the recent legislation.
Many people will simply have retained content from their preferred performers without ever considering that the dialogue-which they are likely to have skipped past-fails to establish any step-family element. Few, if any, will have viewed these mainstream scenes as incest-themed; the dialogue was typically perfunctory and incidental, and most viewers will have assumed any “step” designation was either irrelevant or already established. This widespread assumption could now prove costly.
Ofgem and Ofcom have evolved into self-aggrandising regulatory bodies whose incompetence is matched only by their institutional overreach, repeatedly imposing costly, poorly designed interventions that expand their own authority while failing to deliver competent outcomes for the public they claim to serve.
@hellolilithlowe 'Your being a bit paranoid there mate, I'm sure they'll be fair'
A man had his house raided 'because he burgled pasta' they didn't break into his safe to find more pasta, they wanted to find something 'better' to target him with.
https://t.co/ruJ98eZrex
The long waited body cam footage from my arrest dated August 2025. 10 police officers in ski masks, face shields and equipped with a battering ram entered my home for an allegation of some burgled pasta from a complimentary buffet in a migrant hotel. Some points to note:-
• excuse the penguin dressing gown!
• there was 95 minutes of footage on 8 body cams so I’ve trimmed it down as best as I can
• They refused to let me help my terminally ill mother out of bed
• They locked a chihuahua and a shih tzu in separate room to us and initially refused to let them out over “safety concerns”
• my girlfriend who is type 1 diabetic and requires insulin to survive, needed insulin immediately. When we were in the lounge it was asked for and told the officers where it was in the bedroom. Apparently 6 officers couldn’t find it after 10 minutes until I said it was a medical emergency and they finally let my girlfriend retrieve it in the exact place she said it was.
• The female police officer in the van with me had the language of a 9 year old on some occasions, using phrases such as “more bigger” and finishing sentences such as “but yeah”. Extremely unprofessional.
A 30 thousand pound operation over an allegation of unpaid plate of pasta from a complimentary migrant buffet.
People should be very cautious with this. I'm personally in favour of tighter rules for more on the edge content but this new law casts a very wide net. We have a police force that will fish for anything if they want get you. This will catch many people out unaware
https://t.co/xPWXDpxkGS
I may be mistaken, but the new law appears to criminalise one of the most widely viewed mainstream adult scenes of the past decade: the Mia Khalifa hijab scene. Individuals who, without realising it, still possess a clip of that scene on an old device could now face imprisonment. The same risk would apply to Mia Khalifa herself should she enter the UK.
The scene depicts her bringing her boyfriend home to meet her mother, after which the encounter develops into a threesome. Most viewers, I would suggest, had little or no interest in (or awareness of) the precise dialogue and therefore never registered any indication that the older woman was portrayed as a stepmother. As a result, one of the most viral adult scenes of its era is now potentially illegal under the recent legislation.
Many people will simply have retained content from their preferred performers without ever considering that the dialogue-which they are likely to have skipped past-fails to establish any step-family element. Few, if any, will have viewed these mainstream scenes as incest-themed; the dialogue was typically perfunctory and incidental, and most viewers will have assumed any “step” designation was either irrelevant or already established. This widespread assumption could now prove costly.
I may be mistaken, but the new law appears to criminalise one of the most widely viewed mainstream adult scenes of the past decade: the Mia Khalifa hijab scene. Individuals who, without realising it, still possess a clip of that scene on an old device could now face imprisonment. The same risk would apply to Mia Khalifa herself should she enter the UK.
The scene depicts her bringing her boyfriend home to meet her mother, after which the encounter develops into a threesome. Most viewers, I would suggest, had little or no interest in (or awareness of) the precise dialogue and therefore never registered any indication that the older woman was portrayed as a stepmother. As a result, one of the most viral adult scenes of its era is now potentially illegal under the recent legislation.
Many people will simply have retained content from their preferred performers without ever considering that the dialogue-which they are likely to have skipped past-fails to establish any step-family element. Few, if any, will have viewed these mainstream scenes as incest-themed; the dialogue was typically perfunctory and incidental, and most viewers will have assumed any “step” designation was either irrelevant or already established. This widespread assumption could now prove costly.
at 3mins she said gender is different from sex. She said sex is biology gender is how you identify.
You should have cornered her ideas right there.
We can go along with this thought. 'transwoman' is just 'gender not sex' So they're male (sex) still - so they (obviously) still have male biology - they still should be in male sports - they still should declare they are a male in hospital - they are male. Going along with their 'gender' choice is just for their feelings, fine, I'll call you her so you don't cry, but you must call yourself a male when required because that is what is real, your biology.
You could agree, that gender is a feeling, a self identity. If John wants to identify as a cat OK, lets call john a cat so john doesn't have a freakout - BUT if we all agree its just a identity then we must also agree by that logic that he's not biologically a cat or female - he is different, NOT the same as a female or cat. Transcat is a transcat. Not a cat. A transwoman is a transwoman not a woman.
Because identify doesn't change biology.
@magpiesaid@ARWURZELBS3 I don't disagree theres some questionable interest.
But, again “child prostitutes” doesn't imply consent. And in that clip he quite clearly said if their under 16 they can't consent.